Literature DB >> 23103002

The risk and outcomes of reoperative tricuspid valve surgery.

Reubendra Jeganathan1, Susan Armstrong, Bassel Al-Alao, Tirone David.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after tricuspid valve reoperation have not been published before. This study examines our 32-year experience in this cohort of patients.
METHODS: Between May 1979 and January 2011, a total of 68 patients who had previous tricuspid valve surgery (49 repairs and 19 replacements) had reoperations on their tricuspid valves. The median age was 60 years (19 to 75). Redo tricuspid valve pathologies included 18 functional and 50 organic. Follow-up was 100% complete, with a mean follow-up of 87 months (5 to 248).
RESULTS: Re-repair of the tricuspid valve was feasible in 26 patients (16 of 18 [89%] functional and 10 of 31 [32%] organic, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 13.2%. Factors related to early mortality were nonelective surgery, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV, left ventricle ejection fraction less than 0.40, cardiopulmonary bypass time greater than 136 minutes, and postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (p < 0.05). Postoperative complications included 9 reoperations for bleeding, 11 postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, 5 renal failure requiring dialysis, 3 strokes, and 13 pacemaker implantation. Factors related to late mortality were age greater than 60 years, male sex, ventilation time greater than 24 hours, cardiopulmonary bypass time greater than 136 minutes, and postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (p < 0.05). Survivors had 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates of 86%, 64%, and 33%, respectively. Functional class improved in hospital survivors; NYHA class I/II 80.6% compared with preoperative NYHA class III/IV of 90% (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Redo tricuspid valve surgery is associated with high operative mortality and morbidity; however, survivors benefited from reasonable survival rates. Re-repair of the tricuspid valve is feasible in the majority of patients with functional tricuspid valve pathology, while the majority of patients with underlying organic pathology required a valve replacement.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23103002     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  24 in total

1.  Reoperations after tricuspid valve repair: re-repair versus replacement.

Authors:  Ho Young Hwang; Kyung-Hwan Kim; Ki-Bong Kim; Hyuk Ahn
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Steven Phan; David H Tian; Tristan D Yan; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

3.  Benefits of a right anterolateral minithoracotomy rather than a median sternotomy in isolated tricuspid redo procedures.

Authors:  Aikebaier Maimaiti; Lai Wei; Ye Yang; Huan Liu; Chunsheng Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation for failing bioprosthetic valves: an evolving standard of care.

Authors:  Sidakpal S Panaich; Mackram F Eleid
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 5.  Strategies for tricuspid valve repair.

Authors:  Nishant Saran; Joseph A Dearani
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-22

Review 6.  Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Krys Milburn; Vinayak Bapat; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Tricuspid surgery for tricuspid regurgitation: review.

Authors:  Tadashi Isomura; Yasuhisa Fukada; Takuya Miyazaki; Masahiro Endo
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

Review 8.  Minimal access tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

Review 9.  How to Treat Tricuspid Valve Disease: What's New on the Horizon?

Authors:  Karina Brüstle; Christelle Calen; Shingo Kuwata; Fabian Nietlispach; Michel Zuber; Francesco Maisano; Maurizio Taramasso
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-03

10.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation: two different patterns of right heart reverse remodelling.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gatti; Luca Dell'Angela; Marco Morosin; Luca Maschietto; Bruno Pinamonti; Bernardo Benussi; Gabriella Forti; Gian Luigi Nicolosi; Gianfranco Sinagra; Aniello Pappalardo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.