BACKGROUND: The fibular flap and the scapular flap are widely used for immediate reconstruction after segmental mandibulectomy. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications between the fibular flap and the scapular flap in immediate mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on 56 patients who had undergone immediate mandibular reconstruction with a fibular flap (38 patients) or a scapular flap (18 patients) after segmental mandibulectomy from 2005 to 2011. The rates of perioperative recipient-site and donor-site complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The overall rate of recipient-site complications did not differ significantly between the fibula group and the scapula flap. However, the rate of donor-site complications was significantly higher in the fibula group than in the scapula group. Partial skin-graft loss in the fibula group occurred in as high as 13 out of 38 patients. DISCUSSION: For immediate mandibular reconstruction, a scapular flap provides short-term results equivalent to those with a fibular flap but with less donor-site morbidity. The major drawbacks of the fibular flap include prolonged healing of the donor site and the delayed mobilisation of patients. Although our first choice of vascularised bone graft is the fibular flap, the scapular flap in an alternative for those patients, especially elderly patients, in whom fibula harvest can result in significant morbidity.
BACKGROUND: The fibular flap and the scapular flap are widely used for immediate reconstruction after segmental mandibulectomy. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications between the fibular flap and the scapular flap in immediate mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on 56 patients who had undergone immediate mandibular reconstruction with a fibular flap (38 patients) or a scapular flap (18 patients) after segmental mandibulectomy from 2005 to 2011. The rates of perioperative recipient-site and donor-site complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The overall rate of recipient-site complications did not differ significantly between the fibula group and the scapula flap. However, the rate of donor-site complications was significantly higher in the fibula group than in the scapula group. Partial skin-graft loss in the fibula group occurred in as high as 13 out of 38 patients. DISCUSSION: For immediate mandibular reconstruction, a scapular flap provides short-term results equivalent to those with a fibular flap but with less donor-site morbidity. The major drawbacks of the fibular flap include prolonged healing of the donor site and the delayed mobilisation of patients. Although our first choice of vascularised bone graft is the fibular flap, the scapular flap in an alternative for those patients, especially elderly patients, in whom fibula harvest can result in significant morbidity.