Literature DB >> 23101944

Improvement of sagittal balance and lumbar lordosis following less invasive adult spinal deformity surgery with expandable cages and percutaneous instrumentation.

Michael Y Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) remains a challenge for the spine surgeon. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has many favorable attributes that would be of great benefit for the ASD population, improvements in lordosis and sagittal balance have remained elusive in cases involving the MIS approach. This report describes the evolution of an MIS method for treating ASD with attention to sagittal correction.
METHODS: Over an 18-month period 25 patients with thoracolumbar scoliosis were treated surgically. The mean patient age was 72 years, and 68% of the population was female. Patients were treated with multilevel facet osteotomies and interbody fusion in which expandable cages (mean 3.2 levels) were placed and percutaneous screw fixation (mean 5.3 levels) was performed. Seven patients underwent supplemental percutaneous iliac fixation.
RESULTS: All patients underwent MIS without conversion to a traditional open procedure. The mean operative time was 273 mins and the mean blood loss was 416 ml. There were no intraoperative complications. The Cobb angle over the scoliotic deformity improved from a mean of 29.2° to that of 9.0° (p < 0.001). Lumbar lordosis between L-1 and S-1 improved from a mean of 27.8° to one of 42.6° (p < 0.001). Sagittal vertical axis improved from 7.4 cm to 4.3 cm (p = 0.001). Numeric pain scale scores improved as well, an average of 3.3 and 4.2 for the leg and back, respectively. A mean improvement of 20.8 points on the Oswestry Disability Index was seen at 12 months. Complications included: two cases requiring hardware repositioning, one case of screw pullout, one asymptomatic pedicle screw breach, prolonged hospitalization from constipation, and one acute coronary syndrome developing 3 days after surgery without myocardial damage.
CONCLUSIONS: An expanding body of evidence suggests that sagittal balance remains a keystone for good outcomes after ASD surgery. Minimally invasive surgery that involves a combination of osteotomies, interbody height restoration, and advanced fixation techniques may achieve this goal in patients with less severe deformities. While feasibility will have to be proven with larger series and improved surgical methods, the present technique holds promise as a means of reducing the significant morbidity associated with surgery in the ASD population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23101944     DOI: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE111081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  12 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?

Authors:  Frederic Jacquot; Daniel Gastambide
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - A narrative review on the present status.

Authors:  S Phani Kiran; G Sudhir
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-08

3.  Minimally invasive surgery in adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompression, anterior/lateral and posterior lumbar approaches.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ya Ruth Huo; Jarred A Hogan; Joshua Xu; Alexander Dunn; Samuel K Cho; Ralph J Mobbs; Patrick McKenna; Trichy Rajagopal; Farhaan Altaf
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

4.  Static Versus Expandable Devices Provide Similar Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Benjamin Khechen; Brittany E Haws; Dil V Patel; Joon S Yoo; Jordan A Guntin; Kaitlyn L Cardinal; Sravisht Iyer; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 5.  Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Junseok Bae; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-03-28

6.  Treatment of the Fractional Curve of Adult Scoliosis With Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Traditional, Open Surgery: An Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Dean Chou; Praveen Mummaneni; Neel Anand; Pierce Nunley; Frank La Marca; Kai-Ming Fu; Richard Fessler; Paul Park; Michael Wang; Khoi Than; Stacie Nguyen; Juan Uribe; Joseph Zavatsky; Vedat Deviren; Adam Kanter; David Okonkwo; Robert Eastlack; Gregory Mundis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-05-10

7.  Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Meshed Allograft Containment Device: Analysis of Subsidence With 12-Month Minimum Follow-Up.

Authors:  John Paul G Kolcun; George M Ghobrial; Kenneth M Crandall; Ken Hsuan-Kan Chang; Giacomo Pacchiorotti; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08-31

Review 8.  The technological development of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Laura A Snyder; John O'Toole; Kurt M Eichholz; Mick J Perez-Cruet; Richard Fessler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Percutaneous Transpedicular Interbody Fusion Technique in Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Stabilization for Pseudoarthrosis Following Pyogenic Spondylitis.

Authors:  Ko Ikuta; Keigo Masuda; Yutaka Yonekura; Takahiro Kitamura; Hideyuki Senba; Satoshi Shidahara
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15

10.  Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model.

Authors:  Kalpit N Shah; Gregory Walker; Sarath C Koruprolu; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.