Literature DB >> 23099208

Of mice, moles and guinea pigs: functional morphology of the middle ear in living mammals.

Matthew J Mason1.   

Abstract

The middle ear apparatus varies considerably among living mammals. Body size, phylogeny and acoustic environment all play roles in shaping ear structure and function, but experimental studies aimed ultimately at improving our understanding of human hearing can sometimes overlook these important species differences. This review focuses on three groups of mammals, bringing together anatomical, zoological and physiological information in order to highlight unusual features of their middle ears and attempt to interpret their function. "Microtype" ears, found in species such as mice and bats, are associated with high-frequency hearing. The orbicular apophysis, the focus of some recent developmental studies on mouse ears, is characteristic of microtype mallei but is not found in humans or other "freely mobile" species. The apophysis increases ossicular inertia about the anatomical axis of rotation: its adaptive purpose in a high-frequency ear is still not clear. Subterranean mammals have convergently evolved a "freely mobile" ossicular morphology which appears to favour lower-frequency sound transmission. More unusual features found in some of these animals include acoustically coupled middle ear cavities, the loss of middle ear muscles and hypertrophied ossicles which are believed to subserve a form of inertial bone conduction. Middle ears of the rodent group Ctenohystrica (which includes guinea pigs and chinchillas, important models in hearing research) show some striking characteristics which together comprise a unique type of auditory apparatus requiring a classification of its own, referred to here as the "Ctenohystrica type". These characteristics include a distinctive malleus morphology, fusion of the malleus and incus, reduction or loss of the stapedius muscle, a synovial stapedio-vestibular articulation and, in chinchillas, enormously expanded middle ear cavities. These characteristics may be functionally linked and associated with the excellent low-frequency hearing found in these animals. The application of new experimental and imaging data into increasingly sophisticated models continues to improve our understanding of middle ear function. However, a more rigorous comparative approach and a better appreciation of the complex patterns of convergent and divergent evolution reflected in the middle ear structures of living mammals are also needed, in order to put findings from different species into the appropriate context. This article is part of a special issue entitled "MEMRO 2012".
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099208     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the mammalian middle ear: a historical review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Maier; Irina Ruf
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Surgical anatomy and pathology of the middle ear.

Authors:  Jan Christoffer Luers; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  The development of the mammalian outer and middle ear.

Authors:  Neal Anthwal; Hannah Thompson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. I: Large middle ears in small desert mammals.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. II: Inferring function from structure.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Amphibious auditory evoked potentials in four North American Testudines genera spanning the aquatic-terrestrial spectrum.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Zeyl; Carol E Johnston
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Early development of the malleus and incus in humans.

Authors:  Charlotte M Burford; Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  A Functional Perspective on the Evolution of the Cochlea.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  The middle ear of the pink fairy armadillo Chlamyphorus truncatus (Xenarthra, Cingulata, Chlamyphoridae): comparison with armadillo relatives using computed tomography.

Authors:  Ana P Basso; Nora S Sidorkewicj; Emma B Casanave; Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Ear morphology in two root-rat species (genus Tachyoryctes) differing in the degree of fossoriality.

Authors:  Lucie Pleštilová; Ema Hrouzková; Hynek Burda; Yonas Meheretu; Radim Šumbera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.