Literature DB >> 23098585

Gluteal fold flaps for perineal reconstruction.

R I S Winterton1, G F Lambe, C Ekwobi, D Oudit, D Mowatt, J V Murphy, G L Ross.   

Abstract

Defects of the perineum are created during ablative procedures for gynaecological, urological and colorectal malignancies. The gluteal fold flap is a reliable means of reconstructing these defects. We retrospectively reviewed case notes of gluteal fold flaps performed for perineal reconstruction over four years (2007-2010) in our institution. 77 perineal defects were reconstructed using unilateral or bilateral gluteal fold flaps (127 flaps in total). 50% of all patients are discharged before 11 days, and 90% were discharged within one month. Mean time to discharge was 13.2 days. 70% of all patients were completely healed at 2 months, and 85% completely healed at three months. Pre-operative radiotherapy was found to have a prolonging effect on the time to discharge (P<0.05) but did not reach statistical significance when considering the eventual time to healing. The number of co-morbidities that each patient had at the time of surgery had a prolonging effect on both time to discharge and time to healing (P<0.03). The type of resected areas that required reconstruction did not have a statistically significant effect on the time to discharge, but defects where the anus had been resected did eventually take longer to heal than those were the anus was not resected (P<0.01). 124 flaps were successful (97.6%) with total or partial flap loss occurring in three. Complications were seen in 34 of the 77 patients (44%), with simple wound breakdown resulting in delayed healing seen most frequently (30%). The gluteal fold fasciocutaneous flap is a versatile option for reconstructing a wide range of pelvic and perineal defects. Patients with multiple co-morbidities, cases with radiotherapy and instances where the anus has been resected are more likely to experience longer healing times. We present our algorithm for management for perineal defects after tumour resection.
Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23098585     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Urotrauma: AUA guideline.

Authors:  Allen F Morey; Steve Brandes; Daniel David Dugi; John H Armstrong; Benjamin N Breyer; Joshua A Broghammer; Bradley A Erickson; Jeff Holzbeierlein; Steven J Hudak; Jeffrey H Pruitt; James T Reston; Richard A Santucci; Thomas G Smith; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Injury to the male external genitalia: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  James Furr; Daniel Culkin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Reconstruction of Perineal Defects: A Comparison of the Myocutaneous Gracilis and the Gluteal Fold Flap in Interdisciplinary Anorectal Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Jan R Thiele; Janick Weber; Hannes P Neeff; Philipp Manegold; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; G B Stark; Steffen U Eisenhardt
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Gender-specific Anatomical Distribution of Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator: A Radiographic Study for Perineal Reconstruction.

Authors:  Regina Sonda; Andrea Monticelli; Erica Dalla Venezia; Chiara Giraudo; Giorgio Giatsidis; Franco Bassetto; Veronica Macchi; Cesare Tiengo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 5.  Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Treatment of Oncological Perineal and Genital Defects.

Authors:  Rebekka Brodbeck; Raymund E Horch; Andreas Arkudas; Justus P Beier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.