Literature DB >> 23096987

The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Colleen M McCarthy1, Clara N Lee, Eric G Halvorson, Elyn Riedel, Andrea L Pusic, Babak J Mehrara, Joseph J Disa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current efficacy data supporting the routine use of acellular dermal matrices in postmastectomy tissue expander/implant reconstruction are limited. A multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in the setting of tissue expander/implant reconstruction. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether the use of matrix would decrease patient-reported postoperative pain. The secondary objective was to determine whether its use would accelerate the rate of postoperative expansion.
METHODS: The randomized controlled trial was conducted at two U.S. centers from 2008 to 2011. Immediately following mastectomy, all patients were randomized to one of two treatment arms: (1) acellular dermal matrix-assisted, tissue expander/implant reconstruction; and (2) submuscular tissue expander/implant placement. All patients were blinded to their treatment arm.
RESULTS: One hundred eight consented to participate; 38 were excluded prior to randomization. In total, 70 patients were randomized. There were no differences seen in immediate postoperative pain (p = 0.19) or pain during the expansion phase (p = 0.65) between treatment arms. There was similarly no difference in postoperative narcotic use (p = 0.38). The rate of postoperative expansion did not differ between groups (p = 0.83).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the use of acellular dermal matrix in the setting of tissue expander/implant reconstruction neither reduces postoperative pain nor accelerates the rate of postoperative expansion. An examination of its efficacy in improving long-term outcomes following tissue expander/implant reconstruction is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23096987      PMCID: PMC4100590          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825f05b4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  39 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Current opinions on indications and algorithms for acellular dermal matrix use in primary prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael M Vu; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

3.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Michael Sorkin; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 5.  Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paula R Gravina; Rowland W Pettit; Matthew J Davis; Sebastian J Winocour; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 6.  Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline.

Authors:  Melissa Shea-Budgell; May Lynn Quan; Blair Mehling; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

7.  Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distributions of Biologic Scaffold Materials Biopsied From Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Sites.

Authors:  Jaime A Cavallo; Noopur Gangopadhyay; Jason Dudas; Andres A Roma; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jack Baty; Sara Baalman; Margaret M Frisella; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Comparisons of Therapeutic and Aesthetic Effects of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Biological Matrix.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Zhongzhao Wang; Xiangyi Kong; Xiangyu Wang; Yi Fang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Meghana G Shamsunder; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Thais O Polanco; Evan Matros; Michelle R Coriddi; Babak J Mehrara; Robert J Allen; Joseph H Dayan; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.169

10.  Breast Reconstruction Using Contour Fenestrated AlloDerm: Does Improvement in Design Translate to Improved Outcomes?

Authors:  Jordan D Frey; Michael Alperovich; Katie E Weichman; Stelios C Wilson; Alexes Hazen; Pierre B Saadeh; Jamie P Levine; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.