BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our limited understanding of how polyfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFCs) may impact on human health suggests the potential for a protective impact on brain health. This study was designed to explore the association between PFCs and cognitive ability in older adults. METHODS: We assessed the association between four PFCs, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), and self-reported limitation due to difficulty remembering or periods of confusion using data from participants aged 60-85 years from the 1999-2000 and 2003-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We also considered whether diabetic status or diabetic medication use modifies this association in light of in vitro evidence that PFCs may act on the same receptors as some diabetic medications. RESULTS: In multivariable adjusted models, point estimates suggest a protective association between PFCs and self-reported cognitive limitation (odds ratio, OR; 95% confidence interval, CI) for a doubling in PFC concentration: PFOS (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.03), PFOA (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.09), PFNA (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79, 1.04) and PFHxS (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82, 1.06). The protective association was concentrated in diabetics, with strong, significant protective associations in nonmedicated diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study suggests that there may be a protective association between exposure to PFCs and cognition in older adults, particularly diabetics.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our limited understanding of how polyfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFCs) may impact on human health suggests the potential for a protective impact on brain health. This study was designed to explore the association between PFCs and cognitive ability in older adults. METHODS: We assessed the association between four PFCs, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), and self-reported limitation due to difficulty remembering or periods of confusion using data from participants aged 60-85 years from the 1999-2000 and 2003-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We also considered whether diabetic status or diabetic medication use modifies this association in light of in vitro evidence that PFCs may act on the same receptors as some diabetic medications. RESULTS: In multivariable adjusted models, point estimates suggest a protective association between PFCs and self-reported cognitive limitation (odds ratio, OR; 95% confidence interval, CI) for a doubling in PFC concentration: PFOS (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.03), PFOA (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78, 1.09), PFNA (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79, 1.04) and PFHxS (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82, 1.06). The protective association was concentrated in diabetics, with strong, significant protective associations in nonmedicated diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study suggests that there may be a protective association between exposure to PFCs and cognition in older adults, particularly diabetics.
Authors: G Stennis Watson; Brenna A Cholerton; Mark A Reger; Laura D Baker; Stephen R Plymate; Sanjay Asthana; Mark A Fishel; J Jacob Kulstad; Pattie S Green; David G Cook; Steven E Kahn; Michelle L Keeling; Suzanne Craft Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: M E Risner; A M Saunders; J F B Altman; G C Ormandy; S Craft; I M Foley; M E Zvartau-Hind; D A Hosford; A D Roses Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: B Winblad; K Palmer; M Kivipelto; V Jelic; L Fratiglioni; L-O Wahlund; A Nordberg; L Bäckman; M Albert; O Almkvist; H Arai; H Basun; K Blennow; M de Leon; C DeCarli; T Erkinjuntti; E Giacobini; C Graff; J Hardy; C Jack; A Jorm; K Ritchie; C van Duijn; P Visser; R C Petersen Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Maureen E Austin; Badrinarayanan S Kasturi; Matthew Barber; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Puliyur S MohanKumar; Sheba M J MohanKumar Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Geary W Olsen; Jean M Burris; David J Ehresman; John W Froehlich; Andrew M Seacat; John L Butenhoff; Larry R Zobel Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Antonia M Calafat; Lee-Yang Wong; Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik; John A Reidy; Larry L Needham Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Maria H Harris; Emily Oken; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; David C Bellinger; Thomas F Webster; Roberta F White; Sharon K Sagiv Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Miranda J Spratlen; Frederica P Perera; Sally Ann Lederman; Virginia A Rauh; Morgan Robinson; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Leonardo Trasande; Julie Herbstman Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Joseph M Braun; Amy E Kalkbrenner; Allan C Just; Kimberly Yolton; Antonia M Calafat; Andreas Sjödin; Russ Hauser; Glenys M Webster; Aimin Chen; Bruce P Lanphear Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 9.031