| Literature DB >> 23095216 |
Steven D Hicks1, Lambert Lewis, Julie Ritchie, Patrick Burke, Ynesse Abdul-Malak, Nyssa Adackapara, Kelly Canfield, Erik Shwarts, Karen Gentile, Zsuzsa Szombathyne Meszaros, Frank A Middleton.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) lead to alterations in central nervous system (CNS) architecture along with impaired learning and memory. Previous work from our group and that of others suggests that one mechanism underlying these changes is alteration of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and DNA-repair in neural stem cells (NSCs) produced as a consequence of ethanol-induced effects on the expression of genes related to p53-signaling. This study tests the hypothesis that changes in the expression of p53-signaling genes represent biomarkers of ethanol abuse which can be identified in the peripheral blood of rat drinking models and human AUD subjects and posits that specific changes may be correlated with differences in neuropsychological measures and CNS structure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23095216 PMCID: PMC3519626 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Ethanol-induced gene expression changes in human lymphoblasts
| 0.0525 | |||
| -0.31 | 0.0725 | 0.1266 | |
| 0.0764 | |||
| -0.44 | 0.1024 | 0.1266 | |
| -0.37 | 0.1143 | 0.1266 | |
| -0.29 | 0.1196 | 0.1266 | |
| 0.1658 | |||
| -0.19 | 0.1724 | 0.1266 | |
| 0.1801 | |||
| -0.12 | 0.2423 | 0.5127 | |
| -0.23 | 0.2561 | 0.1266 | |
| -0.17 | 0.2595 | 0.1266 | |
| 0.09 | 0.3009 | 0.5127 | |
| -0.34 | 0.3205 | 0.2752 | |
| -0.35 | 0.3559 | 0.5127 | |
| -0.20 | 0.3597 | 0.2752 | |
| -0.26 | 0.3729 | 0.5127 | |
| 0.09 | 0.3942 | 0.2752 | |
| 0.10 | 0.4639 | 0.2752 | |
| -0.22 | 0.5296 | 0.5127 | |
| 0.05 | 0.5766 | 0.5127 | |
| -0.09 | 0.5912 | 0.5127 | |
| -0.37 | 0.6082 | 0.8273 | |
| 0.06 | 0.6242 | 0.5127 | |
| -0.15 | 0.6435 | 0.8273 | |
| -0.08 | 0.8085 | 0.8273 | |
| -0.06 | 0.8190 | 0.5127 | |
| -0.07 | 0.8410 | 0.8273 | |
| 0.00 | 0.8822 | 0.5127 | |
| 0.00 | 0.8917 | 0.5127 | |
| 0.03 | 0.8928 | 0.8273 | |
| -0.02 | 0.9212 | 0.5127 | |
| 0.02 | 0.9242 | 0.8273 |
These genes represent the complete set of genes analyzed by QuantiGene Plex 2.0. assays in cultured human lymphoblasts as well as primary human and rat PBLs.
Nominally significant observations are indicated in boldface italics.
40 genes significantly changed in mouse NS-5 cells and rat PBLs
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.11 | 0.96 | | | |
| 0.56 | -0.29 | | | |
| -1.56 | -0.63 | X | | |
| -0.76 | 0.49 | X | | |
| -0.19 | -0.37 | | | |
| -4.12 | -0.60 | X | X | |
| -2.90 | -0.65 | X | | |
| -3.32 | -0.98 | X | | |
| -2.55 | -0.49 | | | |
| -2.89 | -0.31 | X | | |
| -3.10 | -0.56 | | | |
| -3.66 | -0.52 | | X | |
| -0.86 | 0.45 | | | |
| -1.15 | -0.40 | | | |
| -0.25 | -0.24 | | | |
| -1.84 | -0.46 | | | |
| -2.20 | -0.31 | X | | |
| -0.60 | 0.24 | | | |
| -2.44 | -0.37 | | | |
| 0.66 | 1.13 | | | |
| -2.86 | -0.25 | | | |
| -0.70 | 0.24 | | | |
| -1.89 | 0.65 | | | |
| -1.10 | 0.42 | | | |
| -1.35 | -0.90 | | | |
| 1.21 | -0.34 | | | |
| -1.11 | 0.54 | | | |
| -0.29 | 0.27 | | | |
| -0.64 | 0.38 | | | |
| -3.84 | -0.42 | | | |
| -2.99 | -0.92 | X | X | |
| -2.98 | -0.45 | | X | |
| -1.89 | -0.22 | | | |
| -0.56 | 0.68 | | | |
| -0.30 | -0.18 | | | |
| -0.25 | 0.60 | | | |
| -1.89 | 0.53 | | | |
| 0.26 | 0.63 | | | |
| -0.51 | -0.43 | | | |
| -0.31 | 0.48 | |||
These genes were significantly changed by microarray in both mouse NSCs and rat PBLs.
X’s indicate those genes which were independently confirmed using either real-time qRT-PCR (mouse) in the Hicks et al. reports [15,16] or QuantiGene Plex (rat) in the current study.
Figure 1Comparison of ethanol-induced significant expression changes in cell proliferation, DNA repair, and apoptosis genes seen in mouse NSCs and rat PBLs. Note that overall, the expression level changes were significantly correlated, particularly for genes with decreased expression in mouse NSCs. Data for the NS-5 comparisons obtained from Hicks et al. study [15].
Figure 2Hierarchical cluster analysis of ethanol-induced changes in expression of 40 genes involved in cell proliferation, DNA repair, and apoptosis genes seen in mouse NSCs (columns 1-4) and rat PBLs (columns 5-12). Note that very few differences were noted due to growth factor conditions in vitro (FGF, TGF) or to gender. Also note that most of the genes in the top of the cluster diagram are decreased in expression and involved in mitotic cell cycle regulation (e.g., cyclin B2, pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1). In contrast, genes involved in DNA repair and apoptosis tended to show increases in expression, although the changes varied by cell type.
Demographic and drinking variables of human subjects
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 38.2 | 40.0 | 31.1 | 35.1 |
| Drinking Days Last Month | 18.5 | 18.9 | 17.1 | - |
| Standardized Drinks Last Week | 27.1 | 29.6 | 16.9 | - |
| Drinking Days Last Week | 3.6 | 3.8 | 2.9 | - |
| Drinks/Drinking Day | 6.6 | 7.2 | 4.5 | - |
| Heavy Drinking Days Last Week | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.6 | - |
| Age at Onset of Drinking Disorder | 19.5 | 19.6 | 19.2 | - |
| Years Drinking | 18.5 | 20.1 | 11.9 | - |
AA, alcohol abuse; AD, alcohol dependence, AUD, alcohol use disorder; F, female; M, male.
Variables significantly different between AUD and control subjects
| Income | 2.4 | 5.1 | -2.16 | 0.00003 | 0.013 | |
| Years Education | 13.2 | 15.7 | -1.19 | 0.00007 | 0.015 | |
| Blood Pressure (Systolic) | 135.2 | 118.9 | 1.137 | 0.00364 | 0.070 | |
| Full Scale IQ Percentile | 53.3 | 83.6 | -1.57 | 0.00024 | 0.025 | |
| Full Scale IQ | 101.3 | 118.0 | -1.16 | 0.00025 | 0.018 | |
| Verbal IQ | 100.8 | 116.9 | -1.16 | 0.00038 | 0.023 | |
| Verbal IQ Percentile | 52.3 | 81.6 | -1.56 | 0.00045 | 0.021 | |
| Combined Number-Sequencing Letter-Sequencing Score | 10.0 | 13.1 | -1.30 | 0.00058 | 0.025 | |
| Performance IQ | 101.4 | 115.7 | -1.14 | 0.00108 | 0.042 | |
| Performance IQ Percentile | 53.6 | 80.5 | -1.50 | 0.00115 | 0.041 | |
| General Memory Percentile | 51.8 | 80.0 | -1.55 | 0.00146 | 0.048 | |
| Auditory Immediate Memory Percentile | 47.2 | 76.2 | -1.61 | 0.00151 | 0.046 | |
| Number Sequencing Score | 9.2 | 12.1 | -1.32 | 0.00176 | 0.046 | |
| Visual Delayed Memory Percentile | 49.4 | 73.9 | -1.49 | 0.00249 | 0.062 | |
| Auditory Delayed Memory Percentile | 51.0 | 77.2 | -1.51 | 0.00335 | 0.079 | |
| Letter Fluency Score | 10.0 | 12.9 | -1.29 | 0.00416 | 0.076 | |
| Category Fluency Score | 10.9 | 13.7 | -1.26 | 0.00499 | 0.088 | |
| Letter Sequencing Score | 9.8 | 12.3 | -1.25 | 0.00517 | 0.087 | |
| Right Hemisphere Temporal Superiolateral Gyrus | 4674.4 | 5642.7 | -1.21 | 0.00009 | 0.013 | |
| Left Hemisphere Broca’s Area 45 | 6164.8 | 7197.7 | -1.17 | 0.00025 | 0.021 | |
| Left Hemisphere Frontal Inferior Triangular Gyrus | 2640.2 | 3232.1 | -1.22 | 0.00042 | 0.022 | |
| Right Hemisphere Pars Opercularis | 3956.7 | 4676.1 | -1.18 | 0.00168 | 0.047 | |
| Right Hemisphere Superiortemporal | 11098.8 | 12513.5 | -1.13 | 0.00336 | 0.075 | |
| Left Hemisphere Parietal Inferior Supramarginal Gyrus | 6301.8 | 7368.1 | -1.17 | 0.00350 | 0.074 | |
| Left Hemisphere Pars Triangularis | 3537.5 | 4218.3 | -1.19 | 0.00351 | 0.071 | |
| Right Hemisphere Frontal Inferior Opercular Gyrus | 3034.4 | 3493.7 | -1.15 | 0.00540 | 0.088 | |
| HUS1 checkpoint homolog (S. pombe) | 493.7 | 558.3 | -1.13 | 0.05221 | - | |
| TP53 tumor protein p53 | 142.7 | 217.5 | -1.52 | 0.01665 | - | |
| MYC v-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (avian) | 216.0 | 312.4 | -1.45 | 0.01402 | - | |
| MUTYH mutY homolog (E. coli) | 54.5 | 68.0 | -1.25 | 0.02417 | - | |
| CDK4 cyclin-dependent kinase 4 | 389.8 | 446.3 | -1.14 | 0.02410 | - | |
| ERCC1 excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 | 627.9 | 735.3 | -1.17 | 0.03782 | - | |
| MCM5 minichromosome maintenance complex component 5 | 307.5 | 396.8 | -1.29 | 0.02045 | - | |
Variables are grouped by category. Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (BH FDR) was used to correct P values, except for gene data, where nominal P values are listed.
Figure 3Hierarchical cluster analysis of the factor loading scores from 40 demographic, medical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and gene expression variables that distinguish subjects with alcohol use disorders from healthy controls. Note the trends for significantly changed neuropsychological variables to load most heavily on factor 1, significantly changed genes to load on factor 2, drinking variables to load on factor 3, and neuroimaging variables to load on factors 4 and 5. One exception to this is the left hemisphere parietal inferior supramarginal gyrus, which showed a strong relationship to the significantly changed gene cluster.
Figure 4Highly significant correlations between (left) or (right) expression in human PBLs and the volume of the left parietal inferior supramarginal gyrus. The histogram plots (inset) show the results of an ANOVA comparing the expression levels of Ercc1 and Mcm5 in all three subject groups. Note that both genes showed a significant main effect of diagnosis, but there was a clear trend for alcohol dependent (AD) subjects to show more of a decrease in expression compared to controls (Ctrls) than alcohol abusing (AA) subjects.