OBJECTIVE: To analyze visuospatial cognition in recently detoxified alcoholics from the perspectives of three ways of conceptualizing spatial information processing: egocentric versus allocentric orientation, featural versus configural analysis, and categorical versus coordinate spatial judgements. METHOD: Twenty-eight chronic alcoholics (19 men, 9 women) were compared to 20 (10 men, 10 women) controls of comparable age and education on a battery of tests of visuospatial scanning, construction, mental imagery, and anterograde and remote spatial memory. Tests were administered 21-40 days after alcoholics entered treatment. RESULTS: Alcoholics displayed impairment in visuospatial scanning, construction, utilizing and manipulating information from visual images and on three tests of anterograde spatial memory, but remote spatial memory was not significantly affected. Their deficits were evident on some measures of allocentric orientation, featural and configural analysis, but consistent deficits on egocentric orientation or categorical or coordinate spatial judgments were not seen. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in spatial cognition exhibited by alcoholics do not seem to arise from dysfunction in any localized brain region. Small but potentially important impairments in fundamental aspects of spatial information processing such as scanning and use of visual imagery were found. The empirical basis and clinical significance of these deficits requires further study.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze visuospatial cognition in recently detoxified alcoholics from the perspectives of three ways of conceptualizing spatial information processing: egocentric versus allocentric orientation, featural versus configural analysis, and categorical versus coordinate spatial judgements. METHOD: Twenty-eight chronic alcoholics (19 men, 9 women) were compared to 20 (10 men, 10 women) controls of comparable age and education on a battery of tests of visuospatial scanning, construction, mental imagery, and anterograde and remote spatial memory. Tests were administered 21-40 days after alcoholics entered treatment. RESULTS: Alcoholics displayed impairment in visuospatial scanning, construction, utilizing and manipulating information from visual images and on three tests of anterograde spatial memory, but remote spatial memory was not significantly affected. Their deficits were evident on some measures of allocentric orientation, featural and configural analysis, but consistent deficits on egocentric orientation or categorical or coordinate spatial judgments were not seen. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in spatial cognition exhibited by alcoholics do not seem to arise from dysfunction in any localized brain region. Small but potentially important impairments in fundamental aspects of spatial information processing such as scanning and use of visual imagery were found. The empirical basis and clinical significance of these deficits requires further study.
Authors: Chella Kamarajan; Bernice Porjesz; Kevin A Jones; Keewhan Choi; David B Chorlian; Ajayan Padmanabhapillai; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Arthur T Stimus; Henri Begleiter Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Rosemary Fama; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Stephanie A Sassoon; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Mary M Valmas; Susan Mosher Ruiz; David A Gansler; Kayle S Sawyer; Marlene Oscar-Berman Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: David H Gustafson; Bret R Shaw; Andrew Isham; Timothy Baker; Michael G Boyle; Michael Levy Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Adolf Pfefferbaum; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Stephanie A Sassoon; Carol A Kemper; Stanley Deresinski; Torsten Rohlfing; Edith V Sullivan Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 13.382