Literature DB >> 23093553

Repeat revascularization after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an evaluation of staged, target lesion, and other unplanned revascularization procedures during the first year.

Joshua M Stolker1, David J Cohen, Kevin F Kennedy, Michael J Pencina, Jason B Lindsey, Laura Mauri, Donald E Cutlip, Neal S Kleiman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although drug-eluting stents and intensive secondary prevention have contributed to improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), repeat revascularization remains relatively common in contemporary practice. We used data from the multicenter Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events registry to evaluate the relative frequency and timing of staged revascularization, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and other nontarget revascularization during the first year after contemporary PCI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with staged revascularization, TLR, and other unplanned procedures (elsewhere in the target vessel or in other coronary arteries) were evaluated in time-dependent models using Kaplan-Meier life-table estimation. Predictors of TLR and unplanned revascularization at nontarget sites were identified using logistic regression. Between July 2004 to June 2007, 10 144 patients undergoing PCI were enrolled at 55 US hospitals, of whom 86% were treated with at least 1 drug-eluting stent. Twelve percent required repeat revascularization within the first year (3% staged; 9% unplanned). More than 75% of staged revascularizations were performed <30 days after index PCI, although there was significant variation in this practice across hospitals (range, 0%-54%). TLR occurred in 4.5% of patients, with higher hazard rates between 2 to 9 months after PCI, whereas the risk of unplanned non-TLR (4.4% cumulative incidence) was constant over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Among unselected patients undergoing PCI in the drug-eluting stent era, the incidence of repeat revascularization at 1 year is ≈12%. Among unplanned procedures, only half are performed for TLR. To achieve further improvements in PCI outcomes, future efforts should concentrate as much on identifying ischemia-producing lesions and intensifying secondary prevention therapies as on the prevention of restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23093553     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  14 in total

1.  Treatment of OSA reduces the risk of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Xiaofan Wu; Shuzheng Lv; Xiaohong Yu; Linyin Yao; Babak Mokhlesi; Yongxiang Wei
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Resolute zotarolimus eluting stent for treatment of long coronary lesions.

Authors:  Martin Rothman
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-06-13

3.  Endoscopic optical coherence tomography: technologies and clinical applications [Invited].

Authors:  Michalina J Gora; Melissa J Suter; Guillermo J Tearney; Xingde Li
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack and acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Tobias Zeus; Ulrike Ketterer; Daniela Leuf; Lisa Dannenberg; Florian Bönner; Rabea Wagstaff; Michael Gliem; Sebastian Jander; Malte Kelm; Amin Polzin
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pearl Zakroysky; Daniel Wojdyla; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Matthew W Sherwood; Matthew T Roe; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauricio G Cohen; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Development and Validation of a Risk Nomogram Model for Predicting Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Shengjue Xiao; Linyun Zhang; Qi Wu; Yue Hu; Xiaotong Wang; Qinyuan Pan; Ailin Liu; Qiaozhi Liu; Jie Liu; Hong Zhu; Yufei Zhou; Defeng Pan
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Impact of renin angiotensin system inhibitor on 3-year clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function: a prospective cohort study from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR).

Authors:  Kyung-Hee Kim; Byoung Geol Choi; Seung-Woon Rha; Cheol Ung Choi; Myung-Ho Jeong
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Impact of chronic total occlusion lesion length on six-month angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jihun Ahn; Seung-Woon Rha; ByoungGeol Choi; Se Yeon Choi; Jae Kyeong Byun; Ahmed Mashaly; Kareem Abdelshafi; Yoonjee Park; Won Young Jang; Woohyeun Kim; Jah Yeon Choi; EunJin Park; Jin Oh Na; Cheol Ung Choi; EungJu Kim; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo; Dong Joo Oh; JinSu Byeon; SangHo Park; HyeYon Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Long-term survival in patients who had CABG with or without prior coronary artery stenting.

Authors:  Pratik Rai; Rebecca Taylor; Mohamad Nidal Bittar
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-11

10.  Liver Fibrosis Scoring Systems as Novel Tools for Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Liu; Ye-Xuan Cao; Jing-Lu Jin; Qi Hua; Yan-Fang Li; Yuan-Lin Guo; Cheng-Gang Zhu; Na-Qiong Wu; Run-Lin Gao; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.