INTRODUCTION: Whole slide imaging is the process of digitizing glass slides and the creation of Whole Slide Images (WSI), which enable the examination of pathology samples on a computer screen in a manner comparable to light microscopy. WSI have been used for different applications in pathology but their use for primary diagnostics is still limited. Implementing WSI for primary diagnostics would be a turning point necessitating extensive validation to unravel pitfalls and difficulties that could be encountered within the routine workflow. This article is aimed to describe the gradual integration of WSI into routine pathology diagnostics in a medium-sized routine pathology laboratory. METHODS: This project was started with optimizing the digital work environment including the setting up of validation studies, scanning preferences, storing WSI and the implemented adjustments to the workflow for the laboratory and the pathologist. Afterwards scanning glass slides was initiated in the department of pathology at the Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands, for performing primary diagnostics of breast biopsies. Later this was extended to other specimen types including resections. RESULTS: The validation studies yielded a high concordance rate between WSI and conventional diagnoses. Routine primary WSI based diagnosis was possible in 82.1% of cases. Failure of digital diagnosis was mainly related to poor image quality and logistic problems. CONCLUSION: The quality of the currently produced WSI is sufficient for primary diagnostics in 82.1% of the cases. Improving image quality, adequate retrieval and controlling scanning error will definitely encourage the wide adaptation in routine diagnostics.
INTRODUCTION: Whole slide imaging is the process of digitizing glass slides and the creation of Whole Slide Images (WSI), which enable the examination of pathology samples on a computer screen in a manner comparable to light microscopy. WSI have been used for different applications in pathology but their use for primary diagnostics is still limited. Implementing WSI for primary diagnostics would be a turning point necessitating extensive validation to unravel pitfalls and difficulties that could be encountered within the routine workflow. This article is aimed to describe the gradual integration of WSI into routine pathology diagnostics in a medium-sized routine pathology laboratory. METHODS: This project was started with optimizing the digital work environment including the setting up of validation studies, scanning preferences, storing WSI and the implemented adjustments to the workflow for the laboratory and the pathologist. Afterwards scanning glass slides was initiated in the department of pathology at the Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands, for performing primary diagnostics of breast biopsies. Later this was extended to other specimen types including resections. RESULTS: The validation studies yielded a high concordance rate between WSI and conventional diagnoses. Routine primary WSI based diagnosis was possible in 82.1% of cases. Failure of digital diagnosis was mainly related to poor image quality and logistic problems. CONCLUSION: The quality of the currently produced WSI is sufficient for primary diagnostics in 82.1% of the cases. Improving image quality, adequate retrieval and controlling scanning error will definitely encourage the wide adaptation in routine diagnostics.
Authors: Liron Pantanowitz; John H Sinard; Walter H Henricks; Lisa A Fatheree; Alexis B Carter; Lydia Contis; Bruce A Beckwith; Andrew J Evans; Avtar Lal; Anil V Parwani Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Shaimaa Al-Janabi; Henk-Jan van Slooten; Mike Visser; Tjeerd van der Ploeg; Paul J van Diest; Mehdi Jiwa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roxana M Buga; Tiberiu Totu; Adrian Dumitru; Mariana Costache; Iustin Floroiu; Nataša Sladoje; Stefan G Stanciu Journal: Sci Data Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Sanjay Mukhopadhyay; Michael D Feldman; Esther Abels; Raheela Ashfaq; Senda Beltaifa; Nicolas G Cacciabeve; Helen P Cathro; Liang Cheng; Kumarasen Cooper; Glenn E Dickey; Ryan M Gill; Robert P Heaton; René Kerstens; Guy M Lindberg; Reenu K Malhotra; James W Mandell; Ellen D Manlucu; Anne M Mills; Stacey E Mills; Christopher A Moskaluk; Mischa Nelis; Deepa T Patil; Christopher G Przybycin; Jordan P Reynolds; Brian P Rubin; Mohammad H Saboorian; Mauricio Salicru; Mark A Samols; Charles D Sturgis; Kevin O Turner; Mark R Wick; Ji Y Yoon; Po Zhao; Clive R Taylor Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 6.394