Literature DB >> 23091106

Risks of less common cancers in proven mutation carriers with lynch syndrome.

Christoph Engel1, Markus Loeffler, Verena Steinke, Nils Rahner, Elke Holinski-Feder, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Hans K Schackert, Heike Goergens, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Timm O Goecke, Wolff Schmiegel, Reinhard Buettner, Gabriela Moeslein, Tom G W Letteboer, Encarna Gómez García, Frederik J Hes, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Fred H Menko, Theo A M van Os, Rolf H Sijmons, Anja Wagner, Irma Kluijt, Peter Propping, Hans F A Vasen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with Lynch syndrome are at high risk for colon and endometrial cancer, but also at an elevated risk for other less common cancers. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to provide risk estimates for these less common cancers in proven carriers of pathogenic mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from the German and Dutch national Lynch syndrome registries. Seven different cancer types were analyzed: stomach, small bowel, urinary bladder, other urothelial, breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. Age-, sex- and MMR gene-specific cumulative risks (CRs) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Sex-specific incidence rates were compared with general population incidence rates by calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the impact of sex and mutated gene on cancer risk.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised 2,118 MMR gene mutation carriers (MLH1, n = 806; MSH2, n = 1,004; MSH6, n = 308). All cancers were significantly more frequent than in the general population. The highest risks were found for male small bowel cancer (SIR, 251; 95% CI, 177 to 346; CR at 70 years, 12.0; 95% CI, 5.7 to 18.2). Breast cancer showed an SIR of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4) and a CR of 14.4 (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.3). MSH2 mutation carriers had a considerably higher risk of developing urothelial cancer than MLH1 or MSH6 carriers.
CONCLUSION: The sex- and gene-specific differences of less common cancer risks should be taken into account in cancer surveillance and prevention programs for patients with Lynch syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23091106     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  85 in total

1.  CUA guidelines on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Samer L Traboulsi; Girish S Kulkarni; Rodney H Breau; Alexandre Zlotta; Andrew Fairey; Alan So; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; Armen G Aprikian; D Robert Siemens; Jonathan I Izawa; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A literature search tool for intelligent extraction of disease-associated genes.

Authors:  Jae-Yoon Jung; Todd F DeLuca; Tristan H Nelson; Dennis P Wall
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  History, genetics, and strategies for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Clinical Factors Associated with Urinary Tract Cancer in Individuals with Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Wischhusen; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Tara G Dhingra; Hajime Uno; Fay Kastrinos; Sapna Syngal; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Sapna Syngal; Randall E Brand; James M Church; Francis M Giardiello; Heather L Hampel; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  How does genome sequencing impact surgery?

Authors:  Marlies S Reimers; Charla C Engels; Peter J K Kuppen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Gerrit J Liefers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Update on Genetic Testing in Gynecologic Cancer.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

Authors:  Daniel D Buchanan; Yen Y Tan; Michael D Walsh; Mark Clendenning; Alexander M Metcalf; Kaltin Ferguson; Sven T Arnold; Bryony A Thompson; Felicity A Lose; Michael T Parsons; Rhiannon J Walters; Sally-Ann Pearson; Margaret Cummings; Martin K Oehler; Penelope B Blomfield; Michael A Quinn; Judy A Kirk; Colin J Stewart; Andreas Obermair; Joanne P Young; Penelope M Webb; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Clinical significance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Kloor; Laura Staffa; Aysel Ahadova; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  The role of germline mutations in the BRCA1/2 and mismatch repair genes in men ascertained for early-onset and/or familial prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sofia Maia; Marta Cardoso; Paula Paulo; Manuela Pinheiro; Pedro Pinto; Catarina Santos; Carla Pinto; Ana Peixoto; Rui Henrique; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.