BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of drug resistance and timely initiation of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis therapy are essential to reduce transmission and improve patient outcomes. We sought to determine whether implementation of the rapid MTBDRplus diagnostic shortened the time from specimen collection to patient MDR tuberculosis therapy initiation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 197 MDR tuberculosis patients treated at Brewelskloof, a rural tuberculosis hospital in Western Cape Province, South Africa, between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (45%) were tested using conventional liquid culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) on solid medium and 108 (55%) were tested using the MTBDRplus assay after positive acid-fast bacilli or culture. Median time from sample taken to therapy initiation was reduced from 80 days (interquartile range [IQR] 62-100) for conventional DST to 55 days (IQR 37.5-78) with the MTBDRplus. Although the laboratory processing time declined significantly, operational delays persisted both in the laboratory and the clinical infrastructure for getting patients started on treatment. In multivariate analysis, patients tested using the MTBDRplus test had a reduced risk of starting treatment 60 days or more after sputum collection of 0.52 (P < .0001) compared with patients tested with culture-based DST, after adjustment for smear status and site of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of MTBDRplus significantly reduced time to MDR tuberculosis treatment initiation. However, DST reporting to clinics was delayed by more than 1 week due, in part, to laboratory operational delays, including dependence on smear and culture positivity prior to MTBDRplus performance. In addition, once MDR tuberculosis was reported, delays in contacting patients and initiating therapy require improvements in clinical infrastructure.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of drug resistance and timely initiation of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis therapy are essential to reduce transmission and improve patient outcomes. We sought to determine whether implementation of the rapid MTBDRplus diagnostic shortened the time from specimen collection to patient MDR tuberculosis therapy initiation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 197 MDR tuberculosispatients treated at Brewelskloof, a rural tuberculosis hospital in Western Cape Province, South Africa, between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (45%) were tested using conventional liquid culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) on solid medium and 108 (55%) were tested using the MTBDRplus assay after positive acid-fast bacilli or culture. Median time from sample taken to therapy initiation was reduced from 80 days (interquartile range [IQR] 62-100) for conventional DST to 55 days (IQR 37.5-78) with the MTBDRplus. Although the laboratory processing time declined significantly, operational delays persisted both in the laboratory and the clinical infrastructure for getting patients started on treatment. In multivariate analysis, patients tested using the MTBDRplus test had a reduced risk of starting treatment 60 days or more after sputum collection of 0.52 (P < .0001) compared with patients tested with culture-based DST, after adjustment for smear status and site of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of MTBDRplus significantly reduced time to MDR tuberculosis treatment initiation. However, DST reporting to clinics was delayed by more than 1 week due, in part, to laboratory operational delays, including dependence on smear and culture positivity prior to MTBDRplus performance. In addition, once MDR tuberculosis was reported, delays in contacting patients and initiating therapy require improvements in clinical infrastructure.
Authors: Karen R Jacobson; Dylan B Tierney; Christie Y Jeon; Carole D Mitnick; Megan B Murray Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Marinus Barnard; Heidi Albert; Gerrit Coetzee; Richard O'Brien; Marlein E Bosman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Anton Mak; Adam Thomas; Mirtha Del Granado; Richard Zaleskis; Nigor Mouzafarova; Dick Menzies Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Patama Monkongdee; Kimberly D McCarthy; Kevin P Cain; Theerawit Tasaneeyapan; H Dung Nguyen; T N Lan Nguyen; T B Yen Nguyen; Nipat Teeratakulpisarn; Nibondh Udomsantisuk; Charles Heilig; Jay K Varma Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Evan W Orenstein; Sanjay Basu; N Sarita Shah; Jason R Andrews; Gerald H Friedland; Anthony P Moll; Neel R Gandhi; Alison P Galvani Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Kwonjune J Seung; David B Omatayo; Salmaan Keshavjee; Jennifer J Furin; Paul E Farmer; Hind Satti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chuan-Chin Huang; Mercedes C Becerra; Roger Calderon; Carmen Contreras; Jerome Galea; Louis Grandjean; Leonid Lecca; Rosa Yataco; Zibiao Zhang; Megan Murray Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: C Ritter; K Lucke; F A Sirgel; R W Warren; P D van Helden; E C Böttger; G V Bloemberg Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Gabriel M Cohen; Paul K Drain; Farzad Noubary; Christie Cloete; Ingrid V Bassett Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Hanna Nebenzahl-Guimaraes; Karen R Jacobson; Maha R Farhat; Megan B Murray Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Keertan Dheda; Tawanda Gumbo; Neel R Gandhi; Megan Murray; Grant Theron; Zarir Udwadia; G B Migliori; Robin Warren Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: M Ballif; V Nhandu; R Wood; J C Dusingize; E J Carter; C P Cortes; C C McGowan; L Diero; C Graber; L Renner; D Hawerlander; S Kiertiburanakul; Q T Du; T R Sterling; M Egger; L Fenner Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: L Otero; A De Orbegoso; A F Navarro; J Ríos; T Párraga; E Gotuzzo; C Seas; P Van der Stuyft Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: William A Wells; Catharina C Boehme; Frank G J Cobelens; Colleen Daniels; David Dowdy; Elizabeth Gardiner; Jan Gheuens; Peter Kim; Michael E Kimerling; Barry Kreiswirth; Christian Lienhardt; Khisi Mdluli; Madhukar Pai; Mark D Perkins; Trevor Peter; Matteo Zignol; Alimuddin Zumla; Marco Schito Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-03-24 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Maia Kipiani; Veriko Mirtskhulava; Nestani Tukvadze; Matthew Magee; Henry M Blumberg; Russell R Kempker Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 9.079