BACKGROUND: Improving our understanding of the relationship between the genotype and the drug resistance phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis will aid the development of more accurate molecular diagnostics for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Studies that use direct genetic manipulation to identify the mutations that cause M. tuberculosis drug resistance are superior to associational studies in elucidating an individual mutation's contribution to the drug resistance phenotype. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature for publications reporting allelic exchange experiments in any of the resistance-associated M. tuberculosis genes. We included studies that introduced single point mutations using specialized linkage transduction or site-directed/in vitro mutagenesis and documented a change in the resistance phenotype. RESULTS: We summarize evidence supporting the causal relationship of 54 different mutations in eight genes (katG, inhA, kasA, embB, embC, rpoB, gyrA and gyrB) and one intergenic region (furA-katG) with resistance to isoniazid, the rifamycins, ethambutol and fluoroquinolones. We observed a significant role for the strain genomic background in modulating the resistance phenotype of 21 of these mutations and found examples of where the same drug resistance mutations caused varying levels of resistance to different members of the same drug class. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights those mutations that have been shown to causally change phenotypic resistance in M. tuberculosis and brings attention to a notable lack of allelic exchange data for several of the genes known to be associated with drug resistance.
BACKGROUND: Improving our understanding of the relationship between the genotype and the drug resistance phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis will aid the development of more accurate molecular diagnostics for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Studies that use direct genetic manipulation to identify the mutations that cause M. tuberculosis drug resistance are superior to associational studies in elucidating an individual mutation's contribution to the drug resistance phenotype. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature for publications reporting allelic exchange experiments in any of the resistance-associated M. tuberculosis genes. We included studies that introduced single point mutations using specialized linkage transduction or site-directed/in vitro mutagenesis and documented a change in the resistance phenotype. RESULTS: We summarize evidence supporting the causal relationship of 54 different mutations in eight genes (katG, inhA, kasA, embB, embC, rpoB, gyrA and gyrB) and one intergenic region (furA-katG) with resistance to isoniazid, the rifamycins, ethambutol and fluoroquinolones. We observed a significant role for the strain genomic background in modulating the resistance phenotype of 21 of these mutations and found examples of where the same drug resistance mutations caused varying levels of resistance to different members of the same drug class. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights those mutations that have been shown to causally change phenotypic resistance in M. tuberculosis and brings attention to a notable lack of allelic exchange data for several of the genes known to be associated with drug resistance.
Entities:
Keywords:
M. tuberculosis; SNPs; genetics; in vitro resistance; microbial susceptibility tests
Authors: B Heym; E Stavropoulos; N Honoré; P Domenech; B Saint-Joanis; T M Wilson; D M Collins; M J Colston; S T Cole Journal: Infect Immun Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Angela M Starks; Aysel Gumusboga; Bonnie B Plikaytis; Thomas M Shinnick; James E Posey Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Dick Menzies; Andrea Benedetti; Anita Paydar; Sarah Royce; Pai Madhukar; William Burman; Andrew Vernon; Christian Lienhardt Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Maha R Farhat; Razvan Sultana; Oleg Iartchouk; Sam Bozeman; James Galagan; Peter Sisk; Christian Stolte; Hanna Nebenzahl-Guimaraes; Karen Jacobson; Alexander Sloutsky; Devinder Kaur; James Posey; Barry N Kreiswirth; Natalia Kurepina; Leen Rigouts; Elizabeth M Streicher; Tommie C Victor; Robin M Warren; Dick van Soolingen; Megan Murray Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Justin L Kandler; Alexandra D Mercante; Tracy L Dalton; Matthew N Ezewudo; Lauren S Cowan; Scott P Burns; Beverly Metchock; Peter Cegielski; James E Posey Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Suha Kadura; Nicholas King; Maria Nakhoul; Hongya Zhu; Grant Theron; Claudio U Köser; Maha Farhat Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: S B Georghiou; M Seifert; D Catanzaro; R S Garfein; F Valafar; V Crudu; C Rodrigues; T C Victor; A Catanzaro; T C Rodwell Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Timothy C Rodwell; Faramarz Valafar; James Douglas; Lishi Qian; Richard S Garfein; Ashu Chawla; Jessica Torres; Victoria Zadorozhny; Min Soo Kim; Matt Hoshide; Donald Catanzaro; Lynn Jackson; Grace Lin; Edward Desmond; Camilla Rodrigues; Kathy Eisenach; Thomas C Victor; Nazir Ismail; Valeru Crudu; Maria Tarcela Gler; Antonino Catanzaro Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 5.948