RATIONALE: Nicotine (NIC) potently increases operant responding for non-NIC reinforcers, and this effect may depend on drug-mediated increases in incentive motivation. According to this hypothesis, NIC should also potently increase approach to Pavlovian-conditioned stimuli associated with rewards. OBJECTIVE: The present studies explored the effects of NIC on Pavlovian-conditioned approach responses. METHOD: To do so, liquid dippers were used to deliver an unconditioned stimulus (US; 0.1 ml sucrose) after presentation of a conditioned stimulus (CS; 30 s illumination of a stimulus light)-both the CS and US were presented in receptacles equipped to monitor head entries. RESULTS: In experiment 1, the CS and US were presented in the same receptacle, but NIC pretreatment (0.4 mg/kg base) did not increase conditioned approach responses. Delivery of the sucrose US was then shifted to receptacle in a different location. All rats learned to approach the new US location (goal-tracking) at similar rates. Approach to the CS receptacle (sign-tracking) declined for saline-pretreated rats, but NIC pretreatment increased sign-tracking. In experiment 2, NIC pretreatment increased sign-tracking when the CS and US were spatially separated during acquisition. In experiment 3, NIC pretreatments were replaced with saline, but the effect of NIC persisted for an additional 24 test sessions. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that NIC increases incentive motivation and that this effect is long-lasting, persisting beyond the pharmacological effects of NIC.
RATIONALE: Nicotine (NIC) potently increases operant responding for non-NIC reinforcers, and this effect may depend on drug-mediated increases in incentive motivation. According to this hypothesis, NIC should also potently increase approach to Pavlovian-conditioned stimuli associated with rewards. OBJECTIVE: The present studies explored the effects of NIC on Pavlovian-conditioned approach responses. METHOD: To do so, liquid dippers were used to deliver an unconditioned stimulus (US; 0.1 ml sucrose) after presentation of a conditioned stimulus (CS; 30 s illumination of a stimulus light)-both the CS and US were presented in receptacles equipped to monitor head entries. RESULTS: In experiment 1, the CS and US were presented in the same receptacle, but NIC pretreatment (0.4 mg/kg base) did not increase conditioned approach responses. Delivery of the sucrose US was then shifted to receptacle in a different location. All rats learned to approach the new US location (goal-tracking) at similar rates. Approach to the CS receptacle (sign-tracking) declined for saline-pretreated rats, but NIC pretreatment increased sign-tracking. In experiment 2, NIC pretreatment increased sign-tracking when the CS and US were spatially separated during acquisition. In experiment 3, NIC pretreatments were replaced with saline, but the effect of NIC persisted for an additional 24 test sessions. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that NIC increases incentive motivation and that this effect is long-lasting, persisting beyond the pharmacological effects of NIC.
Authors: Matthew T Weaver; Charles F Geier; Melissa E Levin; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved; Eric C Donny Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-04-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Eric C Donny; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2007-11-28 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Aric C Madayag; Sierra J Stringfield; Kathryn J Reissner; Charlotte A Boettiger; Donita L Robinson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Nathalie Vanhille; Aude Belin-Rauscent; Adam C Mar; Eric Ducret; David Belin Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Ari Kirshenbaum; John Green; Michael Fay; Angelique Parks; Jesse Phillips; Jason Stone; Tessa Roy Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Matthew I Palmatier; Marissa R Kellicut; A Brianna Sheppard; Russell W Brown; Donita L Robinson Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Sierra J Stringfield; Matthew I Palmatier; Charlotte A Boettiger; Donita L Robinson Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 5.250