AIMS: Experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) model mirrors important mechanisms of inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (iDCM). In EAM, inflammatory CD133(+) progenitors are a major cellular source of cardiac myofibroblasts in the post-inflammatory myocardium. We hypothesized that exogenous delivery of macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) can stimulate macrophage lineage differentiation of inflammatory progenitors and, therefore, prevent their naturally occurring myofibroblast fate in EAM. METHODS AND RESULTS: EAM was induced in wild-type (BALB/c) and nitric oxide synthase 2-deficient (Nos2(-/-)) mice and CD133(+) progenitors were isolated from inflamed hearts. In vitro, M-CSF converted inflammatory CD133(+) progenitors into nitric oxide-producing F4/80(+) macrophages and prevented transforming growth factor-β-mediated myofibroblast differentiation. Importantly, only a subset of heart-infiltrating CD133(+) progenitors expresses macrophage-specific antigen F4/80 in EAM. These CD133(+)/F4/80(hi) cells show impaired myofibrogenic potential compared with CD133(+)/F4/80(-) cells. M-CSF treatment of wild-type mice with EAM at the peak of disease markedly increased CD133(+)/F4/80(hi) cells in the myocardium, and CD133(+) progenitors isolated from M-CSF-treated mice failed to differentiate into myofibroblasts. In contrast, M-CSF was not effective in converting CD133(+) progenitors from inflamed hearts of Nos2(-/-) mice into macrophages, and M-CSF treatment did not result in increased CD133(+)/F4/80(hi) cell population in hearts of Nos2(-/-) mice. Accordingly, M-CSF prevented post-inflammatory fibrosis and left ventricular dysfunction in wild-type but not in Nos2(-/-) mice. CONCLUSION: Active and NOS2-dependent induction of macrophage lineage differentiation abrogates the myofibrogenic potential of heart-infiltrating CD133(+) progenitors. Modulating the in vivo differentiation fate of specific progenitors might become a novel approach for the treatment of inflammatory heart diseases.
AIMS: Experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) model mirrors important mechanisms of inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (iDCM). In EAM, inflammatory CD133(+) progenitors are a major cellular source of cardiac myofibroblasts in the post-inflammatory myocardium. We hypothesized that exogenous delivery of macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) can stimulate macrophage lineage differentiation of inflammatory progenitors and, therefore, prevent their naturally occurring myofibroblast fate in EAM. METHODS AND RESULTS:EAM was induced in wild-type (BALB/c) and nitric oxide synthase 2-deficient (Nos2(-/-)) mice and CD133(+) progenitors were isolated from inflamed hearts. In vitro, M-CSF converted inflammatory CD133(+) progenitors into nitric oxide-producing F4/80(+) macrophages and prevented transforming growth factor-β-mediated myofibroblast differentiation. Importantly, only a subset of heart-infiltrating CD133(+) progenitors expresses macrophage-specific antigen F4/80 in EAM. These CD133(+)/F4/80(hi) cells show impaired myofibrogenic potential compared with CD133(+)/F4/80(-) cells. M-CSF treatment of wild-type mice with EAM at the peak of disease markedly increased CD133(+)/F4/80(hi) cells in the myocardium, and CD133(+) progenitors isolated from M-CSF-treated mice failed to differentiate into myofibroblasts. In contrast, M-CSF was not effective in converting CD133(+) progenitors from inflamed hearts of Nos2(-/-) mice into macrophages, and M-CSF treatment did not result in increased CD133(+)/F4/80(hi) cell population in hearts of Nos2(-/-) mice. Accordingly, M-CSF prevented post-inflammatory fibrosis and left ventricular dysfunction in wild-type but not in Nos2(-/-) mice. CONCLUSION: Active and NOS2-dependent induction of macrophage lineage differentiation abrogates the myofibrogenic potential of heart-infiltrating CD133(+) progenitors. Modulating the in vivo differentiation fate of specific progenitors might become a novel approach for the treatment of inflammatory heart diseases.
Authors: Florian Leuschner; Gabriel Courties; Partha Dutta; Luke J Mortensen; Rostic Gorbatov; Brena Sena; Tatiana I Novobrantseva; Anna Borodovsky; Kevin Fitzgerald; Victor Koteliansky; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Marina Bohlender; Soeren Meyer; Felix Lasitschka; Benjamin Meder; Hugo A Katus; Charles Lin; Peter Libby; Filip K Swirski; Daniel G Anderson; Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Nahrendorf Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Wen-Shin Lee; Katalin Erdelyi; Csaba Matyas; Partha Mukhopadhyay; Zoltan V Varga; Lucas Liaudet; György Haskú; Daniela Čiháková; Raphael Mechoulam; Pal Pacher Journal: Mol Med Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Ingmar Sören Meyer; Carl Christoph Goetzke; Meike Kespohl; Martina Sauter; Arnd Heuser; Volker Eckstein; Hans-Peter Vornlocher; Daniel G Anderson; Jan Haas; Benjamin Meder; Hugo Albert Katus; Karin Klingel; Antje Beling; Florian Leuschner Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Sarah Nasreen Schmidt; Wilfried Reichardt; Beat A Kaufmann; Carolin Wadle; Dominik von Elverfeldt; Peter Stachon; Ingo Hilgendorf; Dennis Wolf; Timo Heidt; Daniel Duerschmied; Karlheinz Peter; Christoph Bode; Constantin von Zur Mühlen; Alexander Maier Journal: Cells Date: 2021-12-04 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Marcin Czepiel; Dario Diviani; Agnieszka Jaźwa-Kusior; Karolina Tkacz; Filip Rolski; Ryszard T Smolenski; Maciej Siedlar; Urs Eriksson; Gabriela Kania; Przemysław Błyszczuk Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 10.787