Literature DB >> 23086770

Comparison of anti-estrogen receptor antibodies SP1, 6F11, and 1D5 in breast cancer: lower 1D5 sensitivity but questionable clinical implications.

G Bogina1, G Zamboni, A Sapino, L Bortesi, M Marconi, G Lunardi, F Coati, A Massocco, L Molinaro, C Pegoraro, M Venturini.   

Abstract

We compared the anti-estrogen receptors (ER) SP1, 6F11, and 1D5 antibodies in breast carcinoma cases with different ranges of positive cells to evaluate whether this could generate different therapies for patients. We selected 66 cases of breast cancer, each of which was immunostained with the 3 antibodies. 1D5 was less sensitive than SP1 and 6F11, as seen in 26, 20, and 21 negative cases, respectively. Nine cases showed differences in endocrine-therapy indications, of which 8 1D5-negative cases showed low positivity for SP1 and/or 6F11. However, these cases were prevalently G3, progesterone receptor-negative or low-positive, with high Ki-67 and positive HER-2 findings, all biological features associated with endocrine resistance. Finally ER values obtained with these 3 antibodies had no implications for chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23086770     DOI: 10.1309/AJCPLX0QJROV2IJG

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  7 in total

1.  The Importance of Epitope Density in Selecting a Sensitive Positive IHC Control.

Authors:  Kodela Vani; Seshi R Sompuram; Anika K Schaedle; Anuradha Balasubramanian; Monika Pilichowska; Stephen Naber; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Kueikwun G Chang; Farzad Noubary; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Impact of estrogen receptor expression on prognosis of ovarian cancer according to antibody clone used for immunohistochemistry: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chun Wai Ng; Kwong-Kwok Wong
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.506

3.  Analytic Response Curves of Clinical Breast Cancer IHC Tests.

Authors:  Kodela Vani; Seshi R Sompuram; Anika K Schaedle; Anuradha Balasubramanian; Steven A Bogen
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  The AF-1-deficient estrogen receptor ERα46 isoform is frequently expressed in human breast tumors.

Authors:  Elodie Chantalat; Frédéric Boudou; Henrik Laurell; Gaëlle Palierne; René Houtman; Diana Melchers; Philippe Rochaix; Thomas Filleron; Alexandre Stella; Odile Burlet-Schiltz; Anne Brouchet; Gilles Flouriot; Raphaël Métivier; Jean-François Arnal; Coralie Fontaine; Françoise Lenfant
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Assess Hormonal Status From Tissue Microarrays in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gil Shamai; Yoav Binenbaum; Ron Slossberg; Irit Duek; Ziv Gil; Ron Kimmel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

6.  A hierarchical approach to combine histological grade and immunohistochemical factors to identify high-risk luminal breast cancers.

Authors:  Felipe Andrés Cordero da Luz; Eduarda da Costa Marinho; Camila Piqui Nascimento; Lara de Andrade Marques; Patrícia Ferreira Ribeiro Delfino; Rafael Mathias Antonioli; Rogério Agenor de Araújo; Marcelo José Barbosa Silva
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-05-04

7.  Propagation of oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen-responsive normal human breast cells in culture.

Authors:  Agla J Fridriksdottir; Jiyoung Kim; René Villadsen; Marie Christine Klitgaard; Branden M Hopkinson; Ole William Petersen; Lone Rønnov-Jessen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.