Literature DB >> 23086586

The importance of both workplace and private life factors in psychological distress: a large cross-sectional survey of French railway company employees.

David Evans1, Luc Mallet, Antoine Flahault, Catherine Cothereau, Sébastien Velazquez, Loïc Capron, Michel Lejoyeux.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The psychological well-being of employees is a priority in occupational health. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress among employees of a large French company, to calculate the associations between distress and stressors in the workplace and private life domains, and to explore confounding across stressor domains.
METHODS: 8,058 employees of the French national railways company completed a nation-wide survey in 2006 (94.3 % participation). Psychological distress was measured by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire and 21 potential stressors and socio-demographic factors by a self-administered questionnaire. Stressors were summarized in scores for work pressure, workplace conflict, and personal life domains. Risk ratios (RRs) between psychological distress and stressors were calculated using robust-variance Poisson regression.
RESULTS: The prevalence of psychological distress was 32.8 % (95 % CI 31.8-33.9 %), higher among women (48.9 %, 95 % CI 46.5-51.7 %) than men (30.1 %, 95 % CI 29.0-31.2 %). Each stressor domain was associated with distress in the final model containing likely confounders and all three domains (RR highest vs. lowest level-work pressure: men 1.55, 95 % CI 1.42-1.70, women 1.42, 95 % CI 1.23-1.63; work conflict: men 2.63, 95 % CI 2.38-2.91, women 1.98, 95 % CI 1.70-2.30; life concerns: men 2.04, 95 % CI 1.86-2.23, women 1.53, 95 % CI 1.32-1.78). The mutually adjusted RRs for the stressor domains were smaller than the unadjusted RRs.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-third of all employees and one-half of female employees experienced psychological distress. All three stressor domains were associated with psychological distress and adjustment reduced the association size, suggesting possible over-estimation if one or more domains are omitted from the survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23086586     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-012-0605-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  80 in total

1.  A multilevel analysis of the demands--control model: is stress at work determined by factors at the group level or the individual level?

Authors:  N W Van Yperen; T A Snijders
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Do occupation and work conditions really matter? A longitudinal analysis of psychological distress experiences among Canadian workers.

Authors:  Alain Marchand; Andrée Demers; Pierre Durand
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2005-07

4.  Association between workplace bullying and depressive symptoms in the French working population.

Authors:  Isabelle Niedhammer; Simone David; Stephanie Degioanni
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 5.  Work and its role in shaping the social gradient in health.

Authors:  Jane E Clougherty; Kerry Souza; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.

Authors:  J Siegrist
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1996-01

7.  The effect of stress-related factors on mental health status among resident doctors in Japan.

Authors:  Takeshi Haoka; Shin-ichiro Sasahara; Yusuke Tomotsune; Satoshi Yoshino; Tetsuhiro Maeno; Ichiyo Matsuzaki
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 8.  The relation between work-related psychosocial factors and the development of depression.

Authors:  Bo Netterstrøm; Nicole Conrad; Per Bech; Per Fink; Ole Olsen; Reiner Rugulies; Stephen Stansfeld
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Working conditions in call-centers, the impact on employee health: a transversal study. Part II.

Authors:  Barbara Charbotel; Sophie Croidieu; Michel Vohito; Anne-Céline Guerin; Liliane Renaud; Joelle Jaussaud; Christian Bourboul; Isabelle Imbard; Dominique Ardiet; Alain Bergeret
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  The contribution of work and non-work stressors to common mental disorders in the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey.

Authors:  C Clark; C Pike; S McManus; J Harris; P Bebbington; T Brugha; R Jenkins; H Meltzer; S Weich; S Stansfeld
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  3 in total

1.  Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors of Frontline Railway Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey in the Ankang Area, Shaanxi Province, China.

Authors:  Xiaona Zhang; Gang Chen; Feng Xu; Kaina Zhou; Guihua Zhuang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The relative importance of work-related and non-work-related stressors and perceived social support on global perceived stress in a cross-sectional population-based sample.

Authors:  Jes Bak Sørensen; Mathias Lasgaard; Morten Vejs Willert; Finn Breinholt Larsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  A multilevel analysis of the role personality play between work organization conditions and psychological distress.

Authors:  Annick Parent-Lamarche; Alain Marchand; Sabine Saade
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-12-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.