Literature DB >> 23086394

Visual prey detection by near-infrared cues in a fish.

Denis Meuthen1, Ingolf P Rick, Timo Thünken, Sebastian A Baldauf.   

Abstract

Many animal species are able to perceive light wavelengths beyond those visible to humans. While numerous species are additionally sensitive to short wavelengths (UV), long wavelengths such as the near-infrared spectrum (NIR) are supposed to be unsuitable for visual perception. Here, we experimentally show that under exclusive NIR illumination, the cichlid fish Pelvicachromis taeniatus displays a clear foraging response towards NIR reflecting prey. Additional control experiments without prey indicate that the observed behavior is not a mere response to the NIR environment. These results give first evidence for NIR visual sensitivity in a functional context and thus challenge the current view about NIR perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23086394     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0980-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  15 in total

1.  Sensory drive in cichlid speciation.

Authors:  Martine E Maan; Kees D Hofker; Jacques J M van Alphen; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Far red bioluminescence from two deep-sea fishes.

Authors:  E A Widder; M I Latz; P J Herring; J F Case
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  UVB-based mate-choice cues used by females of the jumping spider Phintella vittata.

Authors:  Jingjing Li; Zengtao Zhang; Fengxiang Liu; Qingqing Liu; Wenjin Gan; Jian Chen; Matthew L M Lim; Daiqin Li
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Infrared reflectance in leaf-sitting neotropical frogs.

Authors:  P A Schwalm; P H Starrett; R W McDiarmid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The visibility of 350 degrees C black-body radiation by the shrimp Rimicaris exoculata and man.

Authors:  D G Pelli; S C Chamberlin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-02-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Ultra-violet photoreceptors in the animal kingdom: their distribution and function.

Authors:  M J Tovée
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Non-rod, non-cone photoreception in the vertebrates.

Authors:  Russell G Foster; Mark W Hankins
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 21.198

8.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities: common shape in the long-wavelength region.

Authors:  T D Lamb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Visual pigments and the acquisition of visual information.

Authors:  J N Lythgoe; J C Partridge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Male mate choice scales female ornament allometry in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Sebastian A Baldauf; Theo C M Bakker; Fabian Herder; Harald Kullmann; Timo Thünken
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  6 in total

1.  Computer animations of color markings reveal the function of visual threat signals in Neolamprologus pulcher.

Authors:  Valentina Balzarini; Michael Taborsky; Fabienne Villa; Joachim G Frommen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 2.  Clinical development of photodynamic agents and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Rengarajan Baskaran; Junghan Lee; Su-Geun Yang
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2018-09-26

3.  Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management.

Authors:  Laura K Elmer; Christine L Madliger; Daniel T Blumstein; Chris K Elvidge; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Andrij Z Horodysky; Nicholas S Johnson; Liam P McGuire; Ronald R Swaisgood; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Sensitivity differences in fish offer near-infrared vision as an adaptable evolutionary trait.

Authors:  Denis Shcherbakov; Alexandra Knörzer; Svenja Espenhahn; Reinhard Hilbig; Ulrich Haas; Martin Blum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Can species-specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation?

Authors:  Marek Šmejkal; Daniel Ricard; Zuzana Sajdlová; Martin Čech; Lukáš Vejřík; Petr Blabolil; Ivana Vejříková; Marie Prchalová; Mojmír Vašek; Allan T Souza; Christer Brönmark; Jiří Peterka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Zebrafish larvae show negative phototaxis to near-infrared light.

Authors:  Sarah Hartmann; Roland Vogt; Jan Kunze; Anna Rauschert; Klaus-Dieter Kuhnert; Josef Wanzenböck; Dunja K Lamatsch; Klaudia Witte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.