BACKGROUND: To identify factors and problems influencing treatment adherence in patients undergoing anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) under real-life conditions. METHODS: Cross-sectional study was conducted of 95 patients receiving ranibizumab therapy on a pro re nata (PRN) regimen with monthly controls in a tertiary health care clinic. Monthly controls included best corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp examination and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Adherence was measured using Kaplan-Meier time-to-discontinuation analysis. Patients were asked to respond to a 16-item questionnaire covering items such as anxiety, subjective benefit, and financial issues of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-two men and 53 women were included. After a mean follow-up time of 675 days (range 63-1008), adherence was 81.1% (77/95). The mean number of follow-up visits was 19 (3-30), the mean number of intravitreal injections was ten (3-23). Seven patients withdrew from treatment due to subjective dissatisfaction with benefit. Other reasons for loss to follow-up were death in one case, serious general disease in three patients, and treatment options closer to home in five cases. Two patients cancelled further follow-up after treatment cessation due to terminal fibrosis. 62.1% of patients were afraid of a negative examination result, whereas 19.0% were afraid of intravitreal injections. A major problem was travel to and from the hospital (46.3%), with 61.5% of patients requiring escort. CONCLUSION: Despite necessary monthly visits, patients showed a high adherence to therapy. The major problem was travel to and from the hospital. From the patients' point of view, anxiety of a negative examination result was more pronounced than fear of intraocular injections, which would be an argument for continuous injections rather than for a PRN regimen.
BACKGROUND: To identify factors and problems influencing treatment adherence in patients undergoing anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) under real-life conditions. METHODS: Cross-sectional study was conducted of 95 patients receiving ranibizumab therapy on a pro re nata (PRN) regimen with monthly controls in a tertiary health care clinic. Monthly controls included best corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp examination and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Adherence was measured using Kaplan-Meier time-to-discontinuation analysis. Patients were asked to respond to a 16-item questionnaire covering items such as anxiety, subjective benefit, and financial issues of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-two men and 53 women were included. After a mean follow-up time of 675 days (range 63-1008), adherence was 81.1% (77/95). The mean number of follow-up visits was 19 (3-30), the mean number of intravitreal injections was ten (3-23). Seven patients withdrew from treatment due to subjective dissatisfaction with benefit. Other reasons for loss to follow-up were death in one case, serious general disease in three patients, and treatment options closer to home in five cases. Two patients cancelled further follow-up after treatment cessation due to terminal fibrosis. 62.1% of patients were afraid of a negative examination result, whereas 19.0% were afraid of intravitreal injections. A major problem was travel to and from the hospital (46.3%), with 61.5% of patients requiring escort. CONCLUSION: Despite necessary monthly visits, patients showed a high adherence to therapy. The major problem was travel to and from the hospital. From the patients' point of view, anxiety of a negative examination result was more pronounced than fear of intraocular injections, which would be an argument for continuous injections rather than for a PRN regimen.
Authors: Philipp Sebastian Muether; Manuel M Hermann; Konrad Koch; Sascha Fauser Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip J Rosenfeld; David M Brown; Jeffrey S Heier; David S Boyer; Peter K Kaiser; Carol Y Chung; Robert Y Kim Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Stuart L Fine; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simon P Rothenbuehler; David Waeber; Christian K Brinkmann; Sebastian Wolf; Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Philipp S Muether; Robert Hoerster; Manuel M Hermann; Bernd Kirchhof; Sascha Fauser Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Mark Humayun; Arturo Santos; Juan Carlos Altamirano; Ramiro Ribeiro; Roberto Gonzalez; Alejandro de la Rosa; Jason Shih; Changling Pang; Fukang Jiang; Philip Calvillo; John Huculak; Jenna Zimmerman; Sean Caffey Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Anthony Obeid; Xinxiao Gao; Ferhina S Ali; Christopher M Aderman; Abtin Shahlaee; Murtaza K Adam; Sundeep K Kasi; Leslie Hyman; Allen C Ho; Jason Hsu Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 7.389