Reinhard Angermann1,2, Teresa Rauchegger1, Yvonne Nowosielski1, Marina Casazza1, Angelika Bilgeri1, Hanno Ulmer3, Claus Zehetner4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. 3. Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. claus.zehetner@i-med.ac.at.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates between patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and those with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in patients, receiving treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), under universal health coverage. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the relevant data of 1264 patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy, in this cohort study. The observation period ranged from September 01, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Intervals between each procedure and the subsequent follow-up examination were measured. Demographic data, visual acuity (VA), the type of transport for treatment access, and distance between the residence and clinic were evaluated as risk factors for LTFU. RESULTS: We collected data for 841 patients with nAMD (age, 81.0 (± 8.1 years)) and 423 patients with DR (age, 67.7 (± 12.1 years)). The rate of LTFU, for at least 6 months, was 28.8% and 2.9% for patients with DR and nAMD, respectively (p < 0.001). In the DR group, 18.9% patients were lost to follow-up exceeding > 12 months. Multivariate regression analysis showed that advanced age, lack of mobility, and need for assisted transport, poor final VA despite treatment, and decrease in vision during the observational period were independent risk factors for LTFU exceeding 12 months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found a high long-term LTFU rate for patients with DR, despite treatment under universal health coverage. Considering the risk of disease progression, particularly in patients with chronic DR, strategies for better compliance and adherence to therapy should be considered for optimized patient care.
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates between patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and those with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in patients, receiving treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), under universal health coverage. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the relevant data of 1264 patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy, in this cohort study. The observation period ranged from September 01, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Intervals between each procedure and the subsequent follow-up examination were measured. Demographic data, visual acuity (VA), the type of transport for treatment access, and distance between the residence and clinic were evaluated as risk factors for LTFU. RESULTS: We collected data for 841 patients with nAMD (age, 81.0 (± 8.1 years)) and 423 patients with DR (age, 67.7 (± 12.1 years)). The rate of LTFU, for at least 6 months, was 28.8% and 2.9% for patients with DR and nAMD, respectively (p < 0.001). In the DR group, 18.9% patients were lost to follow-up exceeding > 12 months. Multivariate regression analysis showed that advanced age, lack of mobility, and need for assisted transport, poor final VA despite treatment, and decrease in vision during the observational period were independent risk factors for LTFU exceeding 12 months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found a high long-term LTFU rate for patients with DR, despite treatment under universal health coverage. Considering the risk of disease progression, particularly in patients with chronic DR, strategies for better compliance and adherence to therapy should be considered for optimized patient care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Age-related macular degeneration; Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor; Compliance; Diabetic retinopathy; Loss to follow-up; Risk factors; Universal health coverage
Authors: Jeffrey G Gross; Adam R Glassman; Lee M Jampol; Seidu Inusah; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Andrew N Antoszyk; Carl W Baker; Brian B Berger; Neil M Bressler; David Browning; Michael J Elman; Frederick L Ferris; Scott M Friedman; Dennis M Marcus; Michele Melia; Cynthia R Stockdale; Jennifer K Sun; Roy W Beck Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Maximilian Weiss; Dawn A Sim; Tina Herold; Ricarda G Schumann; Raffael Liegl; Christoph Kern; Thomas Kreutzer; Johannes Schiefelbein; Miriam Rottmann; Siegfried Priglinger; Karsten Ulrich KortUEm Journal: Retina Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: E Boulanger-Scemama; G Querques; F About; N Puche; M Srour; V Mane; N Massamba; F Canoui-Poitrine; E H Souied Journal: J Fr Ophtalmol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 0.818
Authors: M Trento; M Bajardi; E Borgo; P Passera; M Maurino; R Gibbins; D R Owens; F Cavallo; M Porta Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Jay F Piccirillo; Anna Vlahiotis; Laurel B Barrett; Kellie L Flood; Edward L Spitznagel; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Kristen Harris Nwanyanwu; Nidhi Talwar; Thomas W Gardner; James S Wrobel; William H Herman; Joshua D Stein Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Tien Y Wong; Mkaya Mwamburi; Ronald Klein; Michael Larsen; Harry Flynn; Marisol Hernandez-Medina; Gayatri Ranganathan; Barbara Wirostko; Andreas Pleil; Paul Mitchell Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Lauren M Wasser; Yishay Weill; Koby Brosh; Itay Magal; Michael Potter; Israel Strassman; Evgeny Gelman; Meni Koslowsky; David Zadok; Joel Hanhart Journal: SN Compr Clin Med Date: 2020-10-28
Authors: George Bresnick; Jorge A Cuadros; Mahbuba Khan; Sybille Fleischmann; Gregory Wolff; Andrea Limon; Jenny Chang; Luohua Jiang; Pablo Cuadros; Elin Rønby Pedersen Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-06
Authors: Vivian Paraskevi Douglas; Konstantinos A A Douglas; Demetrios G Vavvas; Joan W Miller; John B Miller Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Ian T Funk; Bryan A Strelow; Meredith R Klifto; O'Rese J Knight; Eric Van Buren; Feng-Chang Lin; David Fleischman Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 2.290