OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess differences in attraction to physical activity, perceived physical competence and parental socialization influences across gender, body mass index and socioeconomic status in Portuguese children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: 683 children, aged 8-10 years, from elementary schools were participants. Attraction to physical activity, perceived physical competence, parental socialization influences and socioeconomic status were assessed via standardized questionnaires. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was calculated using body mass index, based on the international cut-off points. MANOVA and ANOVA models were conducted. RESULTS: Boys reported greater enjoyment of games and sports participation than did girls. Boys and normal-weight children perceived themselves as being more successful and physically competent than did girls and obese children. Normal-weight girls enjoyed participation in vigorous physical activity more than did overweight and obese girls. Obese children felt less accepted by their peers in games and sports than did normal-weight and overweight children. High and medium socioeconomic status children perceived physical activity participation as of greater importance than did low-socioeconomic status children. High-socioeconomic status girls reported greater liking of the exertional aspects of physical activity compared to low socioeconomic status girls. High socioeconomic status children were more likely to perceive their parents as positive role models and perceived that they had greater enjoyment of physical activity than did lower socioeconomic status children. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that physical activity promotion interventions should focus on girls, obese children and lower socioeconomic status children as these individuals tend to have lower levels of attraction to physical activity, lower perceived physical competence and less parent physical activity support, which puts them at greater risk of being physically inactive.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess differences in attraction to physical activity, perceived physical competence and parental socialization influences across gender, body mass index and socioeconomic status in Portuguese children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: 683 children, aged 8-10 years, from elementary schools were participants. Attraction to physical activity, perceived physical competence, parental socialization influences and socioeconomic status were assessed via standardized questionnaires. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was calculated using body mass index, based on the international cut-off points. MANOVA and ANOVA models were conducted. RESULTS:Boys reported greater enjoyment of games and sports participation than did girls. Boys and normal-weight children perceived themselves as being more successful and physically competent than did girls and obesechildren. Normal-weight girls enjoyed participation in vigorous physical activity more than did overweight and obesegirls. Obesechildren felt less accepted by their peers in games and sports than did normal-weight and overweight children. High and medium socioeconomic status children perceived physical activity participation as of greater importance than did low-socioeconomic status children. High-socioeconomic status girls reported greater liking of the exertional aspects of physical activity compared to low socioeconomic status girls. High socioeconomic status children were more likely to perceive their parents as positive role models and perceived that they had greater enjoyment of physical activity than did lower socioeconomic status children. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that physical activity promotion interventions should focus on girls, obesechildren and lower socioeconomic status children as these individuals tend to have lower levels of attraction to physical activity, lower perceived physical competence and less parent physical activity support, which puts them at greater risk of being physically inactive.
Authors: Sarah A Amin; Paula J Duquesnay; Catherine M Wright; Kenneth Chui; Christina D Economos; Jennifer M Sacheck Journal: Pediatr Exerc Sci Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Jill A Nolan; Christa L Lilly; Janie M Leary; Wesley Meeteer; Hugh D Campbell; Geri A Dino; Leslie Cotrell Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2016-08-16
Authors: Aïna Chalabaev; Stefan Sieber; David Sander; Stéphane Cullati; Silvio Maltagliati; Philippe Sarrazin; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Boris Cheval Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2022-02-03
Authors: Alessandra Borges; Thayse Natacha Gomes; Daniel Santos; Sara Pereira; Fernanda K dos Santos; Raquel Chaves; Peter T Katzmarzyk; José Maia Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah L Taylor; Whitney B Curry; Zoe R Knowles; Robert J Noonan; Bronagh McGrane; Stuart J Fairclough Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Georges Baquet; Nicola D Ridgers; Aurélie Blaes; Julien Aucouturier; Emmanuel Van Praagh; Serge Berthoin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Keren Best; Kylie Ball; Dorota Zarnowiecki; Rebecca Stanley; James Dollman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 3.390