Literature DB >> 23085528

Gender, weight status and socioeconomic differences in psychosocial correlates of physical activity in schoolchildren.

Ana Seabra1, Denisa Mendonça, José Maia, Gregory Welk, Robert Brustad, António M Fonseca, André F Seabra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess differences in attraction to physical activity, perceived physical competence and parental socialization influences across gender, body mass index and socioeconomic status in Portuguese children.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: 683 children, aged 8-10 years, from elementary schools were participants. Attraction to physical activity, perceived physical competence, parental socialization influences and socioeconomic status were assessed via standardized questionnaires. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was calculated using body mass index, based on the international cut-off points. MANOVA and ANOVA models were conducted.
RESULTS: Boys reported greater enjoyment of games and sports participation than did girls. Boys and normal-weight children perceived themselves as being more successful and physically competent than did girls and obese children. Normal-weight girls enjoyed participation in vigorous physical activity more than did overweight and obese girls. Obese children felt less accepted by their peers in games and sports than did normal-weight and overweight children. High and medium socioeconomic status children perceived physical activity participation as of greater importance than did low-socioeconomic status children. High-socioeconomic status girls reported greater liking of the exertional aspects of physical activity compared to low socioeconomic status girls. High socioeconomic status children were more likely to perceive their parents as positive role models and perceived that they had greater enjoyment of physical activity than did lower socioeconomic status children.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that physical activity promotion interventions should focus on girls, obese children and lower socioeconomic status children as these individuals tend to have lower levels of attraction to physical activity, lower perceived physical competence and less parent physical activity support, which puts them at greater risk of being physically inactive.
Copyright © 2012 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23085528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  16 in total

1.  The Association Between Perceived Athletic Competence and Physical Activity: Implications for Low-Income Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Sarah A Amin; Paula J Duquesnay; Catherine M Wright; Kenneth Chui; Christina D Economos; Jennifer M Sacheck
Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.333

2.  Physical and Social Contexts of Physical Activity Behaviors of Fifth and Seventh Grade Youth.

Authors:  Ruth P Saunders; Marsha Dowda; Kerry Mciver; Samantha M McDonald; Russell R Pate
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.118

3.  Barriers to Parent Support for Physical Activity in Appalachia.

Authors:  Jill A Nolan; Christa L Lilly; Janie M Leary; Wesley Meeteer; Hugh D Campbell; Geri A Dino; Leslie Cotrell
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2016-08-16

4.  Positive parenting mitigates the effects of poor self-regulation on body mass index trajectories from ages 4-15 years.

Authors:  Lauren E Connell; Lori A Francis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Early-Life Socioeconomic Circumstances and Physical Activity in Older Age: Women Pay the Price.

Authors:  Aïna Chalabaev; Stefan Sieber; David Sander; Stéphane Cullati; Silvio Maltagliati; Philippe Sarrazin; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Boris Cheval
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-02-03

6.  A count model to study the correlates of 60 min of daily physical activity in Portuguese children.

Authors:  Alessandra Borges; Thayse Natacha Gomes; Daniel Santos; Sara Pereira; Fernanda K dos Santos; Raquel Chaves; Peter T Katzmarzyk; José Maia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Why Are Girls Less Physically Active than Boys? Findings from the LOOK Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Rohan M Telford; Richard D Telford; Lisa S Olive; Thomas Cochrane; Rachel Davey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predictors of Segmented School Day Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Children from a Northwest England Low-Income Community.

Authors:  Sarah L Taylor; Whitney B Curry; Zoe R Knowles; Robert J Noonan; Bronagh McGrane; Stuart J Fairclough
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Objectively assessed recess physical activity in girls and boys from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds.

Authors:  Georges Baquet; Nicola D Ridgers; Aurélie Blaes; Julien Aucouturier; Emmanuel Van Praagh; Serge Berthoin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  In Search of Consistent Predictors of Children's Physical Activity.

Authors:  Keren Best; Kylie Ball; Dorota Zarnowiecki; Rebecca Stanley; James Dollman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.