Literature DB >> 23084680

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy: initial experience with a novel surgical approach to uterovaginal prolapse.

Peter L Rosenblatt1, Costas A Apostolis, Michele R Hacker, Anthony DiSciullo.   

Abstract

The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new laparoscopic technique for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse using a transcervical access port to minimize the laparoscopic incision. From February 2008 through August 2010, symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in 43 patients was evaluated and surgically treated using this novel procedure. Preoperative assessment included pelvic examination, the pelvic organ prolapse quantification scoring system (POP-Q), and complex urodynamic testing with prolapse reduction to evaluate for symptomatic or occult stress urinary incontinence. The surgical procedure consisted of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with anterior and posterior mesh extension. Concomitant procedures were performed as indicated. All procedures were completed laparoscopically using only 5-mm abdominal port sites, with no intraoperative complications. Patients were followed up postoperatively for pelvic examination and POP-Q at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. The median (interquartile range) preoperative POP-Q values for point Aa was 0 (-1.0 to 1.0), and for point C was -1.0 (-3.0 to 2.0). Postoperatively, median points Aa and C were significantly improved at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months (all p < .001). One patient was found to have a mesh/suture exposure from the sacrocervicopexy, which was managed conservatively without surgery. We conclude that laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy is a safe and feasible surgical approach to treatment of uterovaginal prolapse, with excellent anatomic results at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Potential advantages of the procedure include minimizing laparoscopic port site size, decreasing the rate of mesh exposure compared with other published data, and reducing the rate of postoperative cyclic bleeding in premenopausal women by removing the cervical core. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the durability and potential long-term sequelae of the procedure.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084680      PMCID: PMC3693750          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  8 in total

Review 1.  Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.

Authors:  Aparna Diwan; Charles R Rardin; Neeraj Kohli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Todd R Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 388 November 2007: supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation: initial experience.

Authors:  Peter Rosenblatt; Gretchen Makai; Anthony DiSciullo
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Natalia Price; A Slack; S R Jackson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 6.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse: a retrospective case series report.

Authors:  Peter L Rosenblatt; David Chelmow; Tanaz R Ferzandi
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jasmine Tan-Kim; Shawn A Menefee; Karl M Luber; Charles W Nager; Emily S Lukacz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Two-phase laparoendoscopic single-site cervical ligament-sparing hysterectomy: An initial experience.

Authors:  Mun-Kun Hong; Tang-Yuan Chu; Jen-Huang Wang; Dah-Ching Ding
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.