STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate apical support in patients desiring uterine preservation with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. DESIGN: Retrospective case series report (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Academic community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty consecutive women who underwent laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. INTERVENTIONS: Synthetic mesh was used to attach the distal uterosacral ligaments and posterior endopelvic fascia to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacral promontory. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system measurements were used and apical support was evaluated using point C. Mean C was -1.13 (+9 to -4) preoperatively, -5.28 (-3 to -13) at 6 weeks postoperatively, -5.26 (-3 to -8) at 6 months postoperatively, and -4.84 (-3 to -7) at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy is an effective option for women with pelvic organ prolapse who desire uterine preservation.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate apical support in patients desiring uterine preservation with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. DESIGN: Retrospective case series report (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Academic community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty consecutive women who underwent laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. INTERVENTIONS: Synthetic mesh was used to attach the distal uterosacral ligaments and posterior endopelvic fascia to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacral promontory. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system measurements were used and apical support was evaluated using point C. Mean C was -1.13 (+9 to -4) preoperatively, -5.28 (-3 to -13) at 6 weeks postoperatively, -5.26 (-3 to -8) at 6 months postoperatively, and -4.84 (-3 to -7) at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy is an effective option for women with pelvic organ prolapse who desire uterine preservation.
Authors: Mèlanie N van IJsselmuiden; Manon H Kerkhof; René P Schellart; Marlies Y Bongers; Wilbert A Spaans; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Peter L Rosenblatt; Costas A Apostolis; Michele R Hacker; Anthony DiSciullo Journal: J Minim Invasive Gynecol Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.137