Literature DB >> 23084555

Extended trochanteric osteotomy followed by cemented impaction allografting in revision hip arthroplasty.

John Charity1, Eleftherios Tsiridis, David Gusmão, Adrian Bauze, John Timperley, Graham Gie.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present the medium- to long-term results of all cases of femoral impaction allografting revision at our institution that required an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) at the time of surgery. Eighteen patients with a mean age of 60 years were evaluated. Indication for revision was aseptic loosening in all cases. The mean follow-up was 123 months (51-170). Charnley-D'Aubigné-Postel scores, stem length, ETO length, ETO healing, and complications were recorded. No patient was lost to follow-up. Signs of clinical healing were noted within the first 6 postoperative months. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative clinical scores was statistically significant. No nonunion of the ETO was observed in any case. These results give support to the combined use of these techniques.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084555     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

Review 1.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Gopinath Duraisamy; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-29

2.  Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: results of sixteen cases after five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kun-Hui Chen; Shang-Wen Tsai; Po-Kuei Wu; Cheng-Fong Chen; Hsin-Yi Wang; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) and fluted tapered modular stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Does ETO integrity or consolidation, really matter?

Authors:  Germán Garabano; Alan Maximiliano Gessara; Cesar Angel Pesciallo; Leonel Perez Alamino; Hernán Del Sel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-09

4.  Removal of well-fixed components in femoral revision arthroplasty with controlled segmentation of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Panagiotis Megas; Christos S Georgiou; Andreas Panagopoulos; Antonis Kouzelis
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  Hip Spacers in Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Rava; Matteo Bruzzone; Umberto Cottino; Emilio Enrietti; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2019-10-11

6.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Khalid Hamad; Sujith Konan
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-04-03

7.  Endofemoral Shooting Technique for Removing Well-fixed Cementless Stems.

Authors:  Kenichi Oe; Hirokazu Iida; Takashi Toyoda; Tomohisa Nakamura; Naofumi Okamoto; Takanori Saito
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-15

8.  Anterior Cortical Window Technique Instead of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Chan Ho Park; Jiung Yeom; Jung-Wee Park; Seok Hyung Won; Young-Kyun Lee; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 9.  Trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kavin Sundaram; Ahmed Siddiqi; Atul F Kamath; Carlos A Higuera-Rueda
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-09-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.