PURPOSE: To further enhance and assess the ability to characterize middle ear effusion (MEE) using non-invasive ultrasound technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective unblinded comparison study. Fifty-six children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years scheduled to undergo bilateral myringotomy with pressure equalization tube placement were enrolled. With the child anesthetized, the probe was placed into the external ear canal after sterile water was inserted. Ultrasound recordings of middle ear contents were analyzed by computer algorithm. Middle ear fluid was collected during myringotomy and analyzed for bacterial culture and viscosity. RESULTS: Ultrasound waveforms yielded a computer algorithm interpretation of middle ear contents in 66% of ears tested. When a result was obtained, the sensitivity and specificity for successfully characterizing middle ear fluid content as either void of fluid, thick fluid (mucoid), or thin fluid (serous or purulent) were at least 94%. Mucoid effusions had higher measured viscosity values (P=.002). Viscosity measures were compared to culture result, and those with low viscosity (thin consistency) had a higher likelihood of having a positive culture (P=.048). CONCLUSION: The device sensitivity and specificity for fluid detection were 94% or greater among interpretable waveforms (66% of those tested). Although this technology provides important information of the middle ear effusion presence and characteristic, further technological improvements are needed.
PURPOSE: To further enhance and assess the ability to characterize middle ear effusion (MEE) using non-invasive ultrasound technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective unblinded comparison study. Fifty-six children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years scheduled to undergo bilateral myringotomy with pressure equalization tube placement were enrolled. With the child anesthetized, the probe was placed into the external ear canal after sterile water was inserted. Ultrasound recordings of middle ear contents were analyzed by computer algorithm. Middle ear fluid was collected during myringotomy and analyzed for bacterial culture and viscosity. RESULTS: Ultrasound waveforms yielded a computer algorithm interpretation of middle ear contents in 66% of ears tested. When a result was obtained, the sensitivity and specificity for successfully characterizing middle ear fluid content as either void of fluid, thick fluid (mucoid), or thin fluid (serous or purulent) were at least 94%. Mucoid effusions had higher measured viscosity values (P=.002). Viscosity measures were compared to culture result, and those with low viscosity (thin consistency) had a higher likelihood of having a positive culture (P=.048). CONCLUSION: The device sensitivity and specificity for fluid detection were 94% or greater among interpretable waveforms (66% of those tested). Although this technology provides important information of the middle ear effusion presence and characteristic, further technological improvements are needed.
Authors: Christopher M Discolo; Michael C Byrd; Teresa Bates; Dov Hazony; Jan Lewandowski; Peter J Koltai Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-12
Authors: William J Steinbach; Theodore C Sectish; Daniel K Benjamin; Kay W Chang; Anna H Messner Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Guillermo L Monroy; Jungeun Won; Roshan Dsouza; Paritosh Pande; Malcolm C Hill; Ryan G Porter; Michael A Novak; Darold R Spillman; Stephen A Boppart Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2019-03-28