Literature DB >> 23084123

Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program.

Salman J Yousuf1, John Kwagyan, Leslie S Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors most important to applicants when selecting an ophthalmology residency program.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: All 595 applicants who submitted a rank list to the Ophthalmology Residency Matching Program for the 2012 match.
METHODS: Participants anonymously completed a 25-item questionnaire after the submission of their rank lists. A multiple-choice format and ordinal scale were used to query applicants on demographics, career plans, and the importance of factors related to program characteristics. One question allowed a free text response to identify factors that caused the applicant to rank a program lower than other programs or not at all (i.e., "red flag"). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors important to applicants when creating their rank lists.
RESULTS: The response rate was 37% (218/595). The 3 most important factors affecting rank lists were resident-faculty relationships, clinical and surgical volume, and diversity of training. The fourth most important was the interview experience with faculty; poor interview experience was the most frequently cited "red flag." Age, gender, and marital status did not affect how applicants rated factors. Applicants planning a post-residency fellowship or an academic career placed greater importance on opportunities for resident research and a program's prestige (P<0.0001). Female and ethnic minority applicants placed greater importance on the diversity of faculty and residents by gender or ethnicity (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Applicants rated educational and interpersonal factors as more important than geographic factors when selecting an ophthalmology residency program. Future career plans and demographic factors influenced the rating of specific factors. The results of this study provide a useful resource to programs preparing for the match.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084123      PMCID: PMC3865976          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  15 in total

1.  Factors that affect National Resident Matching Program rankings of medical students applying for radiology residency.

Authors:  E Scott Pretorius; Janie Hrung
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  US graduate medical education, 1999-2000.

Authors:  S E Brotherton; F A Simon; S C Tomany
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The residents' viewpoint of the matching process, factors influencing their program selection, and satisfaction with the results.

Authors:  Daniel M Laskin; Robert J Lesny; Al M Best
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  The influence of quality-of-life, academic, and workplace factors on residency program selection.

Authors:  Francis S Nuthalapaty; James R Jackson; John Owen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Ophthalmology Residency Match outcomes for 2011.

Authors:  Salman J Yousuf; Leslie S Jones
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Factors influencing career choices among graduating ophthalmology residents.

Authors:  Steven J Gedde; Donald L Budenz; Payman Haft; James M Tielsch; Yunhee Lee; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Factors affecting medical students' selection of an internal medicine residency program.

Authors:  Eva M Aagaard; Katherine Julian; Julien Dedier; Ira Soloman; Jan Tillisch; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Applicants' choice of a residency training program.

Authors:  W H Sledge; P J Leaf; M H Sacks
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  What do applicants look for when selecting internal medicine residency programs? A comparison of rating scale and open-ended responses.

Authors:  T C Flynn; M S Gerrity; L R Berkowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Why first-year family practice residents choose their residency programs.

Authors:  E J Mayeaux; J Arnold
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Brenda S Houmard; Sidharth Oberoi; Anton Manyak; Seine Chiang; Sara Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

2.  Current Applicant Perceptions of the Ophthalmology Residency Match.

Authors:  Michael J Venincasa; Louis Z Cai; Steven J Gedde; Tara Uhler; Jayanth Sridhar
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  How do orthopaedic surgery residency program websites feature diversity? An analysis of 187 orthopaedic surgery programs in the United States.

Authors:  Samuel A Cohen; Michelle Xiao; Thompson Zhuang; John Michaud; Harsh Wadhwa; Lauren Shapiro; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2022 May-Jun

4.  Content Evaluation of Residency Websites for All 159 Anesthesiology ACGME Programs in the USA.

Authors:  Samuel A Cohen; Landon E Cohen; Felipe D Perez; Alex Macario; James Xie
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2022-01-01

5.  Presence of Diversity or Inclusion Information on US Ophthalmology Residency Program Websites.

Authors:  Nahomy Ledesma Vicioso; Fasika Woreta; Grace Sun
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 8.253

6.  Do otolaryngology residency applicants relocate for training?

Authors:  Grant M Gebhard; Leah J Hauser; Miranda J Dally; David A Weitzenkamp; Cristina Cabrera-Muffly
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Residency Program Diversity Recruitment and Education: Survey of Efforts and Barriers to Implementation.

Authors:  Ugochi T Aguwa; Jiangxia Wang; Fasika Woreta; Jeff Pettey; Grace Sun; Stacy Pineles; Divya Srikumaran
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.524

8.  Mentoring as a Buffer for the Syndemic Impact of Racism and COVID-19 among Diverse Faculty within Academic Medicine.

Authors:  Jeannette E South-Paul; Kendall M Campbell; Norma Poll-Hunter; Audrey J Murrell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marissa G Vadi; Mathew R Malkin; John Lenart; Gary R Stier; Jason W Gatling; Richard L Applegate
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-03

10.  Students' Perspectives and Concerns for the 2020 to 2021 Radiation Oncology Interview Season.

Authors:  Ashlyn S Everett; Scott Strickler; Samuel R Marcrom; Andrew M McDonald
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.