Literature DB >> 23083800

Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: incidence, clinical impact, and management.

Marco Borghesi1, Eugenio Brunocilla, Riccardo Schiavina, Giuseppe Martorana.   

Abstract

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) offers comparable oncologic results but a lower risk of chronic kidney disease when compared with radical nephrectomy; however it can result in positive surgical margins (PSMs) and consequently to a possible risk of oncologic failure. The aim of this review is to evaluate the incidence of PSMs after nephron-sparing surgery, to assess their clinical and oncologic impact, and to provide an overview of the possible therapeutic management. We performed a nonsystematic review of the literature in the MEDLINE database using the following keywords: partial nephrectomy, nephron-sparing surgery, and positive margin. We reviewed articles published only in English from January 2002 to May 2012. The overall incidence of PSMs after NSS ranges from 0% to 7%, with no significant differences in open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. Smaller tumor size could result in a higher risk of PSMs. Even if there is not a clear agreement in the clinical evidence, local recurrence seems to be more likely in patients with PSMs, especially in those with high-grade tumors. Development of metastases and cancer-specific survival, as seen in midterm follow-up studies, seems to be comparable to those in patients with negative surgical margins. Considering the globally low risk of local recurrence, development of metastasis, or cancer-specific mortality, careful surveillance could be the best management option for most patients with PSMs after NSS.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23083800     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  25 in total

1.  Long-term oncological outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Benoit Peyronnet; Thibaut Benoit; Bastien Cabarrou; Thomas Seisen; Mathieu Roumiguié; Benjamin Pradere; Zine-Eddine Khene; Quentin Manach; Gregory Verhoest; Mathieu Thoulouzan; Jerome Parra; Nicolas Doumerc; Romain Mathieu; Christophe Vaessen; Michel Soulié; Morgan Roupret; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  American Confederation of Urology (CAU) experience in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Octavio A Castillo; José J Rozanec; Marcelo Featherston; Pablo Holst; José Cocisfran Alves Milfont; Patricio García Marchiñena; Alberto Jurado Navarro; Anamaría Autrán; Agustín R Rovegno; Oscar Rodríguez Faba; Joan Palou; Victor Teixeira Dubeux; Luciano Nuñez Bragayrac; Rene Sotelo; Stenio Zequi; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Mario Álvarez-Maestro; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Gustavo Villoldo; Alberto Villaronga; Diego Abreu Clavijo; Ricardo Decia; Rodrigo Frota; Ivar Vidal-Mora; Diana Finkelstein; Juan I Monzó Gardiner; Oscar Schatloff; Andres Hernández-Porrás; Félix Santaella-Torres; Emilio T Quesada; Rodolfo Sánchez-Salas; Hugo Dávila; Humberto Villavicencio Mavric
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Margin and complication rates in clampless partial nephrectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic surgeries.

Authors:  Luigi Mearini; Elisabetta Nunzi; Alberto Vianello; Manuel Di Biase; Massimo Porena
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-04-15

4.  Clinical outcomes following laparoscopic management of pT3 renal masses: A large, multi-institutional cohort.

Authors:  Jasmir G Nayak; Premal Patel; Jennifer Bjazevic; Zhihui Liu; Olli Saarela; Anil Kapoor; Ricardo Rendon; Jun Kawakami; Simon Tanguay; Rodney H Breau; Peter C Black; Darrel E Drachenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors after nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel López-Costea; Xavier Bonet; Jose Pérez-Reggeti; Begoña Etcheverry; Francisco Vigués
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Positive surgical margins during partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Results from Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis) collaborative.

Authors:  Rahul K Bansal; Simon Tanguay; Antonio Finelli; Ricardo Rendon; Ronald B Moore; Rodney H Breau; Louis Lacombe; Peter C Black; Jun Kawakami; Darrel Drachenberg; Stephen Pautler; Olli Saarela; Zhihui Liu; Michael A S Jewett; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Nephron-sparing surgery for multifocal and hereditary renal tumors.

Authors:  Adam R Metwalli; William M Linehan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 8.  Positive surgical margins in nephron-sparing surgery: risk factors and therapeutic consequences.

Authors:  Julie Steinestel; Sandra Steffens; Konrad Steinestel; Andres Jan Schrader
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Oncologic outcomes of patients with positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy: a 25-year single institution experience.

Authors:  Firas G Petros; Michael J Metcalfe; Kai-Jie Yu; Sarp K Keskin; Bryan M Fellman; Courtney M Chang; Cindy Gu; Pheroze Tamboli; Surena F Matin; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Predictors of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: A large single-center experience.

Authors:  Ercan Malkoç; Matthew J Maurice; Önder Kara; Daniel Ramirez; Ryan J Nelson; Julien Dagenais; Khaled Fareed; Amr Fergany; Robert J Stein; Pascal Mouracade; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.