Literature DB >> 26788228

Clinical outcomes following laparoscopic management of pT3 renal masses: A large, multi-institutional cohort.

Jasmir G Nayak1, Premal Patel2, Jennifer Bjazevic2, Zhihui Liu3, Olli Saarela4, Anil Kapoor5, Ricardo Rendon6, Jun Kawakami7, Simon Tanguay8, Rodney H Breau9, Peter C Black10, Darrel E Drachenberg11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We described the clinical and oncological outcomes of patients treated by laparoscopic surgery for non-metastatic pT3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
METHODS: We queried a multi-institutional database for patients diagnosed with non-metastatic pathological T3 RCC from 13 Canadian centres treated laparoscopically (radical or partial nephrectomy) between 2008 and 2014. Clinical and pathological outcomes were evaluated. Progression was defined as the development of recurrence or metastatic disease. Log-rank testing and Kaplan-Meier statistical methods assessed for differences and estimated progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: In total, 176 patients were identified with a median age of 64 years. The median tumour size was 7.0 cm. Pre-clinical stage was cT1 to cT4 in 39%, 28%, 30% and 3%, respectively. The median blood loss was 150 mL (range: 0-6000) and the median operative time was 124 minutes (range: 60-360). Most lesions were clear cell RCC (80%). After a median follow-up of 17.6 months (range: 0.2-75.0), disease progression occurred in 26% (46/176) of patients, consisting of local recurrence in 7% (3/46), and metastatic disease in 93% (43/46). The 3-year PFS was 67%, with a median PFS of 49 months. Of those who progressed, the median time to progression was 10.3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest cohort of pT3 RCC patients treated laparoscopically in the literature and suggests that for properly selected patients, laparoscopic management of locally advanced renal masses yields acceptable short-term oncological outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26788228      PMCID: PMC4707891          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  29 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States.

Authors:  I S Gill; A M Meraney; D K Schweizer; S S Savage; M G Hobart; G T Sung; D Nelson; A C Novick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Matthew D Shuford; Elspeth M McDougall; Sam S Chang; Bonnie J LaFleur; Joseph A Smith; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe.

Authors:  A Breda; S V Stepanian; J Liao; J S Lam; G Guazzoni; M Stifelman; K Perry; A Celia; G Breda; P Fornara; S Jackman; A Rosales; J Palou; M Grasso; V Pansadoro; V Disanto; F Porpiglia; C Milani; C Abbou; R Gaston; G Janetschek; N A Soomro; J de la Rosette; M P Laguna; P G Schulam
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

Authors:  M D Dunn; A J Portis; A L Shalhav; A M Elbahnasy; C Heidorn; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system.

Authors:  John S Lam; Oleg Shvarts; John T Leppert; Allan J Pantuck; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Partial nephrectomy does not compromise survival in patients with pathologic upstaging to pT2/pT3 or high-grade renal tumors compared with radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J Weight; Casey Lythgoe; Raman Unnikrishnan; Brian R Lane; Steven C Campbell; Amr F Fergany
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Survival of patients with nonmetastatic pT3 renal tumours: a matched comparison of laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Laurent Salomon; Herve Lang; Laurent Zini; Didier Jacqmin; Andrea Manunta; Maxime Crepel; Vincenzo Ficarra; Luca Cindolo; Alexandre de La Taille; Pierre Karakiewicz; Jean-Jacques Patard
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Outcomes and predictors of clinical T1 to pathological T3a tumor up-staging after robotic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Gorin; Mark W Ball; Phillip M Pierorazio; Youssef S Tanagho; Sam B Bhayani; Jihad H Kaouk; Craig G Rogers; Michael D Stifelman; Ali Khalifeh; Ramesh Kumar; Ganesh Sivarajan; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jun-Hang Luo; Fang-Jian Zhou; Dan Xie; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Bing Liao; Hong-Wei Zhao; Yu-Ping Dai; Ling-Wu Chen; Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Matched pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of T3 renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A Laird; K C C Choy; H Delaney; M L Cutress; K M O'Connor; D A Tolley; S A McNeill; G D Stewart; A C P Riddick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  3 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline for followup of patients after treatment of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Leonardo L Monteiro; Darrel E Drachenberg; Adrian S Fairey; Antonio Finelli; Anil Kapoor; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Michael J Leveridge; Nicholas E Power; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Robert Sabbagh; Alan I So; Simon Tanguay; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Outcomes and prognosticators of stage 4 renal cell carcinoma with pathological T4 primary lesion using a large, Canadian, multi-institutional database.

Authors:  Justin D Oake; Premal Patel; Luke T Lavallée; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Olli Saarela; Laurence Klotz; Ronald B Moore; Anil Kapoor; Antonio Finelli; Ricardo A Rendon; Jun Kawakami; Alan I So; Darrel E Drachenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Situ Xiong; Ming Jiang; Yi Jiang; Bing Hu; Ru Chen; Zhijun Yao; Wen Deng; Xianwen Wan; Xiaoqiang Liu; Luyao Chen; Bin Fu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.