Literature DB >> 23083719

The effect of nonspecific binding of lambda repressor on DNA looping dynamics.

Carlo Manzo1, Chiara Zurla, David D Dunlap, Laura Finzi.   

Abstract

The λ repressor (CI) protein-induced DNA loop maintains stable lysogeny, yet allows efficient switching to lysis. Herein, the kinetics of loop formation and breakdown has been characterized at various concentrations of protein using tethered particle microscopy and a novel, to our knowledge, method of analysis. Our results show that a broad distribution of rate constants and complex kinetics underlie loop formation and breakdown. In addition, comparison of the kinetics of looping in wild-type DNA and DNA with mutated o3 operators showed that these sites may trigger nucleation of nonspecific binding at the closure of the loop. The average activation energy calculated from the rate constant distribution is consistent with a model in which nonspecific binding of CI between the operators shortens their effective separation, thereby lowering the energy barrier for loop formation and broadening the rate constant distribution for looping. Similarly, nonspecific binding affects the kinetics of loop breakdown by increasing the number of loop-securing protein interactions, and broadens the rate constant distribution for this reaction. Therefore, simultaneous increase of the rate constant for loop formation and reduction of that for loop breakdown stabilizes lysogeny. Given these simultaneous changes, the frequency of transitions between the looped and the unlooped state remains nearly constant. Although the loop becomes more stable thermodynamically with increasing CI concentration, it still opens periodically, conferring sensitivity to environmental changes, which may require switching to lytic conditions.
Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23083719      PMCID: PMC3475330          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  32 in total

1.  Octamerization of lambda CI repressor is needed for effective repression of P(RM) and efficient switching from lysogeny.

Authors:  I B Dodd; A J Perkins; D Tsemitsidis; J B Egan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  DNA looping and physical constraints on transcription regulation.

Authors:  José M G Vilar; Stanislas Leibler
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Supercoiling and denaturation in Gal repressor/heat unstable nucleoid protein (HU)-mediated DNA looping.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lia; David Bensimon; Vincent Croquette; Jean-Francois Allemand; David Dunlap; Dale E A Lewis; Sankar Adhya; Laura Finzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Salmonella enterica response regulator SsrB relieves H-NS silencing by displacing H-NS bound in polymerization mode and directly activates transcription.

Authors:  Don Walthers; You Li; Yingjie Liu; Ganesh Anand; Jie Yan; Linda J Kenney
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Transition in the temperature-dependence of GFP fluorescence: from proton wires to proton exit.

Authors:  Pavel Leiderman; Dan Huppert; Noam Agmon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Role of the lytic repressor in prophage induction of phage lambda as analyzed by a module-replacement approach.

Authors:  Shota Atsumi; John W Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Advances in single-molecule fluorescence methods for molecular biology.

Authors:  Chirlmin Joo; Hamza Balci; Yuji Ishitsuka; Chittanon Buranachai; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

8.  Gene regulation at the right operator (OR) bacteriophage lambda. I. OR3 and autogenous negative control by repressor.

Authors:  R Maurer; B Meyer; M Ptashne
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1980-05-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Real-time observation of DNA looping dynamics of Type IIE restriction enzymes NaeI and NarI.

Authors:  Bram van den Broek; Francesco Vanzi; Davide Normanno; Francesco S Pavone; Gijs J L Wuite
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Direct demonstration and quantification of long-range DNA looping by the lambda bacteriophage repressor.

Authors:  Chiara Zurla; Carlo Manzo; David Dunlap; Dale E A Lewis; Sankar Adhya; Laura Finzi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  20 in total

1.  Positive and negative design for nonconsensus protein-DNA binding affinity in the vicinity of functional binding sites.

Authors:  Ariel Afek; David B Lukatsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  DNA supercoiling enhances cooperativity and efficiency of an epigenetic switch.

Authors:  Kamilla Norregaard; Magnus Andersson; Kim Sneppen; Peter Eigil Nielsen; Stanley Brown; Lene B Oddershede
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Probing transient protein-mediated DNA linkages using nanoconfinement.

Authors:  Maedeh Roushan; Parminder Kaur; Alena Karpusenko; Preston J Countryman; Carlos P Ortiz; Shuang Fang Lim; Hong Wang; Robert Riehn
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  DNA supercoiling: a regulatory signal for the λ repressor.

Authors:  Yue Ding; Carlo Manzo; Geraldine Fulcrand; Fenfei Leng; David Dunlap; Laura Finzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Single-molecule analysis of RAG-mediated V(D)J DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Lovely; Robert C Brewster; David G Schatz; David Baltimore; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Measuring shape-dependent looping probability of DNA.

Authors:  Tung T Le; Harold D Kim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Probing the elastic limit of DNA bending.

Authors:  Tung T Le; Harold D Kim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Multiple LacI-mediated loops revealed by Bayesian statistics and tethered particle motion.

Authors:  Stephanie Johnson; Jan-Willem van de Meent; Rob Phillips; Chris H Wiggins; Martin Lindén
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Studying DNA looping by single-molecule FRET.

Authors:  Tung T Le; Harold D Kim
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Tethered particle motion reveals that LacI·DNA loops coexist with a competitor-resistant but apparently unlooped conformation.

Authors:  Joel D Revalee; Gerhard A Blab; Henry D Wilson; Jason D Kahn; Jens-Christian Meiners
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.