BACKGROUND: The present study examined the prospective relationships between subjective fatigue, cognitive function, and everyday functioning. METHODS: A cohort study with secondary data analysis was conducted using data from 2,781 community-dwelling older adults without dementia who were enrolled to participate in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) randomized intervention trial. Measures included demographic and health information at baseline, and annual assessments of subjective fatigue, cognitive function (i.e. speed of processing, memory, and reasoning), and everyday functioning (i.e. everyday speed and everyday problem-solving) over five years. RESULTS: Four distinct classes of subjective fatigue were identified using growth mixture modeling: one group complaining fatigue "some of the time" at baseline but "most of the time" at five-year follow-up (increased fatigue), one complaining fatigue "a good bit of the time" constantly over time (persistent fatigue), one complaining fatigue "most of the time" at baseline but "some of the time" at five-year follow-up (decreased fatigue), and the fourth complaining fatigue "some of the time" constantly over time (persistent energy). All domains of cognitive function and everyday functioning declined significantly over five years; and the decline rates, but not the baseline levels, differed by the latent class of subjective fatigue. Except for the decreased fatigue class, there were different degrees of significant associations between the decline rates of subjective fatigue and all domains of cognitive function and everyday functioning in other classes of subjective fatigue. CONCLUSION: Future interventions should address subjective fatigue when managing cognitive and functional abilities in community-dwelling older adults.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The present study examined the prospective relationships between subjective fatigue, cognitive function, and everyday functioning. METHODS: A cohort study with secondary data analysis was conducted using data from 2,781 community-dwelling older adults without dementia who were enrolled to participate in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) randomized intervention trial. Measures included demographic and health information at baseline, and annual assessments of subjective fatigue, cognitive function (i.e. speed of processing, memory, and reasoning), and everyday functioning (i.e. everyday speed and everyday problem-solving) over five years. RESULTS: Four distinct classes of subjective fatigue were identified using growth mixture modeling: one group complaining fatigue "some of the time" at baseline but "most of the time" at five-year follow-up (increased fatigue), one complaining fatigue "a good bit of the time" constantly over time (persistent fatigue), one complaining fatigue "most of the time" at baseline but "some of the time" at five-year follow-up (decreased fatigue), and the fourth complaining fatigue "some of the time" constantly over time (persistent energy). All domains of cognitive function and everyday functioning declined significantly over five years; and the decline rates, but not the baseline levels, differed by the latent class of subjective fatigue. Except for the decreased fatigue class, there were different degrees of significant associations between the decline rates of subjective fatigue and all domains of cognitive function and everyday functioning in other classes of subjective fatigue. CONCLUSION: Future interventions should address subjective fatigue when managing cognitive and functional abilities in community-dwelling older adults.
Authors: Jeremy Walston; Evan C Hadley; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski; William B Ershler; Tamara Harris; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sherry L Willis; Sharon L Tennstedt; Michael Marsiske; Karlene Ball; Jeffrey Elias; Kathy Mann Koepke; John N Morris; George W Rebok; Frederick W Unverzagt; Anne M Stoddard; Elizabeth Wright Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ruth Ann Marrie; Elizabeth Fisher; Deborah M Miller; Jar-Chi Lee; Richard A Rudick Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2004-12-21 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Sonja Vestergaard; Susan G Nayfield; Kushang V Patel; Basil Eldadah; Matteo Cesari; Luigi Ferrucci; Graziano Ceresini; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Diego Z Carvalho; Erik K St Louis; Bradley F Boeve; Michelle M Mielke; Scott A Przybelski; David S Knopman; Mary M Machulda; Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Hsin-Yi Jean Tang; Susan M McCurry; Kenneth C Pike; Michael Von Korff; Michael V Vitiello Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Leorey N Saligan; Cristan Farmer; Elizabeth D Ballard; Bashkim Kadriu; Carlos A Zarate Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Elizabeth A Salerno; Amal A Wanigatunga; Yang An; Jacek K Urbanek; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick; Jennifer A Schrack Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Bennett Kukla; Mia Anthony; Shuyi Chen; Adam Turnbull; Timothy M Baran; Feng V Lin Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Inger Utne; Borghild Løyland; Ellen Karine Grov; Steven Paul; Melisa L Wong; Yvette P Conley; Bruce A Cooper; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 2.398