PURPOSE: The proportion of people over 65 years of age is higher in rural areas than in urban areas, and their numbers are expected to increase in the next decade. This study used Andersen's behavioral model to examine quality of life (QOL) in a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults 65 years and older according to geographic location. Specifically, associations between 3 dimensions of QOL (health-related QOL [HQOL], social functioning, and emotional well-being) and needs and health behaviors were examined. METHODS: The 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination survey was linked with the 2007 Area Resources File via the National Center for Health Statistics' remote access system. Frequencies and distribution patterns were assessed according to rural, adjacent, and urban locations. FINDINGS: Older adults reported high levels of QOL; however, rural older adults had lower social functioning than their urban counterparts. Older blacks and Hispanics had lower scores than whites on 2 dimensions of QOL. Associations between QOL and needs and health behaviors varied. Although activities of daily living were associated with all 3 dimensions, others were associated with 1 or 2 dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The lower scores on social functioning in rural areas suggest that rural older adults may be socially isolated. Older rural adults may need interventions to maintain physical and mental health, strengthen social relationships and support, and increase their participation in the community to promote QOL. In addition, older blacks and Hispanics seem more vulnerable than whites and may need more assistance.
PURPOSE: The proportion of people over 65 years of age is higher in rural areas than in urban areas, and their numbers are expected to increase in the next decade. This study used Andersen's behavioral model to examine quality of life (QOL) in a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults 65 years and older according to geographic location. Specifically, associations between 3 dimensions of QOL (health-related QOL [HQOL], social functioning, and emotional well-being) and needs and health behaviors were examined. METHODS: The 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination survey was linked with the 2007 Area Resources File via the National Center for Health Statistics' remote access system. Frequencies and distribution patterns were assessed according to rural, adjacent, and urban locations. FINDINGS: Older adults reported high levels of QOL; however, rural older adults had lower social functioning than their urban counterparts. Older blacks and Hispanics had lower scores than whites on 2 dimensions of QOL. Associations between QOL and needs and health behaviors varied. Although activities of daily living were associated with all 3 dimensions, others were associated with 1 or 2 dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The lower scores on social functioning in rural areas suggest that rural older adults may be socially isolated. Older rural adults may need interventions to maintain physical and mental health, strengthen social relationships and support, and increase their participation in the community to promote QOL. In addition, older blacks and Hispanics seem more vulnerable than whites and may need more assistance.
Authors: Martin Fortin; Gina Bravo; Catherine Hudon; Lise Lapointe; José Almirall; Marie-France Dubois; Alain Vanasse Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Chad E Cook; Jan K Richardson; Ricardo Pietrobon; Larissa Braga; Henrique Martins Silva; Dennis Turner Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Kimberly A Skarupski; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Julia L Bienias; Paul A Scherr; Matthew M Zack; David G Moriarty; Denis A Evans Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 3.440
Authors: Nynikka R A Palmer; Ann M Geiger; Lingyi Lu; L Douglas Case; Kathryn E Weaver Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anna M Gorczyca; Richard A Washburn; Lauren Ptomey; Matthew S Mayo; Debra K Sullivan; Cheryl A Gibson; Robert Lee; Sarah Stolte; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: J Priyanka Vakkalanka; Karisa K Harland; Morgan B Swanson; Nicholas M Mohr Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Forrest Scogin; Kenneth Lichstein; Elizabeth A DiNapoli; Julie Woosley; S Justin Thomas; Michael A LaRocca; Haley D Byers; Lisa Mieskowski; Christina Pierpaoli Parker; Xin Yang; Jason Parton; Anna McFadden; James D Geyer Journal: J Psychother Integr Date: 2018-09