BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: GPCRs undergo both homologous and heterologous regulatory processes in which receptor phosphorylation plays a critical role. The protein kinases responsible for each pathway are well established; however, other molecular details that characterize each pathway remain unclear. In this study, the molecular mechanisms that determine the differences in the functional roles and intracellular trafficking between homologous and PKC-mediated heterologous internalization pathways for the dopamine D₂ receptor were investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: All of the S/T residues located within the intracellular loops of D₂ receptor were mutated, and the residues responsible for GRK- and PKC-mediated internalization were determined in HEK-293 cells and SH-SY5Y cells. The functional role of receptor internalization and the cellular components that determine the post-endocytic fate of internalized D₂ receptors were investigated in the transfected cells. KEY RESULTS: T134, T225/S228/S229 and S325 were involved in PKC-mediated D₂ receptor desensitization. S229 and adjacent S/T residues mediated the PKC-dependent internalization of D₂ receptors, which induced down-regulation and desensitization. S/T residues within the second intracellular loop and T225 were the major residues involved in GRK-mediated internalization of D₂ receptors, which induced receptor resensitization. ARF6 mediated the recycling of D₂ receptors internalized in response to agonist stimulation. In contrast, GASP-1 mediated the down-regulation of D₂ receptors internalized in a PKC-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GRK- and PKC-mediated internalizations of D₂ receptors occur through different intracellular trafficking pathways and mediate distinct functional roles. Distinct S/T residues within D₂ receptors and different sorting proteins are involved in the dissimilar regulation of D₂ receptors by GRK2 and PKC.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: GPCRs undergo both homologous and heterologous regulatory processes in which receptor phosphorylation plays a critical role. The protein kinases responsible for each pathway are well established; however, other molecular details that characterize each pathway remain unclear. In this study, the molecular mechanisms that determine the differences in the functional roles and intracellular trafficking between homologous and PKC-mediated heterologous internalization pathways for the dopamine D₂ receptor were investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: All of the S/T residues located within the intracellular loops of D₂ receptor were mutated, and the residues responsible for GRK- and PKC-mediated internalization were determined in HEK-293 cells and SH-SY5Y cells. The functional role of receptor internalization and the cellular components that determine the post-endocytic fate of internalized D₂ receptors were investigated in the transfected cells. KEY RESULTS: T134, T225/S228/S229 and S325 were involved in PKC-mediated D₂ receptor desensitization. S229 and adjacent S/T residues mediated the PKC-dependent internalization of D₂ receptors, which induced down-regulation and desensitization. S/T residues within the second intracellular loop and T225 were the major residues involved in GRK-mediated internalization of D₂ receptors, which induced receptor resensitization. ARF6 mediated the recycling of D₂ receptors internalized in response to agonist stimulation. In contrast, GASP-1 mediated the down-regulation of D₂ receptors internalized in a PKC-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GRK- and PKC-mediated internalizations of D₂ receptors occur through different intracellular trafficking pathways and mediate distinct functional roles. Distinct S/T residues within D₂ receptors and different sorting proteins are involved in the dissimilar regulation of D₂ receptors by GRK2 and PKC.
Authors: Jennifer L Whistler; Johan Enquist; Aaron Marley; Jamie Fong; Fredrik Gladher; Pamela Tsuruda; Stephen R Murray; Mark Von Zastrow Journal: Science Date: 2002-07-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: D I Cho; C Min; K S Jung; S Y Cheong; M Zheng; S J Cheong; M H Oak; J H Cheong; B K Lee; K M Kim Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Guillaume Montagnac; Hélène de Forges; Elizabeth Smythe; Charles Gueudry; Maryse Romao; Jean Salamero; Philippe Chavrier Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Cecilea C Clayton; Prashant Donthamsetti; Nevin A Lambert; Jonathan A Javitch; Kim A Neve Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: María E Terrón-Díaz; Sara J Wright; Melina A Agosto; Olivier Lichtarge; Theodore G Wensel Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Anika Mann; Alastair C Keen; Hanka Mark; Pooja Dasgupta; Jonathan A Javitch; Meritxell Canals; Stefan Schulz; J Robert Lane Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 4.379