| Literature DB >> 23082637 |
Syed Azizur Rahman1, Tara Kielmann, Barbara McPake, Charles Normand.
Abstract
Despite the wealth of studies on health and healthcare-seeking behaviour among the Bengali population in Bangladesh, relatively few studies have focused specifically on the tribal groups in the country. This study aimed at exploring the context, reasons, and choices in patterns of healthcare-seeking behaviour of the hill tribal population of Bangladesh to present the obstacles and challenges faced in accessing healthcare provision in the tribal areas. Participatory tools and techniques, including focus-group discussions, in-depth interviews, and participant-observations, were used involving 218 men, women, adolescent boys, and girls belonging to nine different tribal communities in six districts. Data were transcribed and analyzed using the narrative analysis approach. The following four main findings emerged from the study, suggesting that the tribal communities may differ from the predominant Bengali population in their health needs and priorities: (a) Traditional healers are still very popular among the tribal population in Bangladesh; (b) Perceptions of the quality and manner of treatment and communication can override costs when it comes to provider-preference; (c) Gender and age play a role in making decisions in households in relation to health matters and treatment-seeking; and (d) Distinct differences exist among the tribal people concerning their knowledge on health, awareness, and treatment-seeking behaviour. The findings challenge the present service-delivery system that has largely been based on the needs and priorities of the plainland population. The present system needs to be reviewed carefully to include a broader approach that takes the sociocultural factors into account, if meaningful improvements are to be made in the health of the tribal people of Bangladesh.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23082637 PMCID: PMC3489951 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v30i3.12299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Fig.Map of Bangladesh showing the tribal areas
Number of FGDs by district, community, location, and type
| District | Tribal community | Upazila | FGD locations and group-types with number of participants | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Birishiri—Male: 12 | ||||
| Netrakona | Mandi | Durgapur | 2. Birishiri—Female: 11 | |
| 3. Birishiri—Adolescent female: 12 | ||||
| Chakma | Naniachar | 4. Betchari—Female: 12 | ||
| Rangamati (CHT) | Marma | Bilaichhari | 5. Dhigalchari—Male: 13 | |
| Tanchanga | Khawakhali | 6. Lungipara—Adolescent female: 13 | ||
| Khashia | Panchhari | 7. Guchachagram-Female: 12 | ||
| Khagrachhari (CHT) | Tipra | Dihginala | 8. Shanti Laxmipur—Male: 12 | |
| Marma | Matiranga | 9. Gagan Chandra Para—Adolescent male: 9 | ||
| Lama | 10. Masterpara—Male: 12 | |||
| Bandarban (CHT) | Marma | B. Sadar | 11. Ghungru Para—Female: 12 | |
| Khyang | ||||
| Ruangchari | 12. Milonpara—Adolescent female: 11 | |||
| Ramu | 13. Panerchara—Male: 12 | |||
| Ukhia | 14. Musharkola—Female: 12 | |||
| Cox's | Bazar | Rakhaine | ||
| Chakma Teknaf | 15. Kharonkhali—Adolescent female 11 Adolescent male: 10 | |||
| Tipra Kamalganj | 16. Magurchara—Female: 12 | |||
| Maulvibazar | Khashia | 17. Ranirbazar—Male: 11 | ||
| Manipuri | Srimangal | 18. Dulchara—Adolescent female: 9 | ||
The plainland ethnic groups, including Santal, were excluded in this study to keep the sample homogeneous in terms of geographical location;
*The Mandi are commonly known as Garo; however, the people prefer to be called Mandi which means human-being (9); FGD=Focus-group discussion; CHT=Chittagong Hill Tracts
Type of healthcare
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Self-care | Instances where no medication was used or where home-remedies were employed |
| Traditional methods | Treatment-seeking from traditional healers, such as |
| Para-professionals | Village practitioners with basic preventive and curative training on health |
| Qualified allopaths | Private practitioners, trained physicians working at NGOs, public-health facilities, such as Union Health and Family Welfare Centres, Upazila Health Complexes, district hospitals, community clinics, missionary hospitals, and army physicians |
| Unqualified allopaths | Drug-sellers, untrained pharmacists, and village |
NGOs=Non-governmental organizations
Fees (in Taka) by type of treatment source and district
| District | UHC and DH | UHFWC | Village | Private practitioner | Missionary hospital | TBA | NGO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rangamati | Registration fee plus unofficial payment | Officially free but unofficial fees reported | 50-300 | 20-30 | 100 | 550 for emergency treatments | 100-300 | NA |
| Khagrachhari | Same as above | - | 50-300 | 20-30 | 100 | NA | 100-300 | Tk 20 for initial enrollment and Tk10 for each visit |
| Bandarban | Same as above | - | 50-300 | 20-30 | 100 | NA | 100-300 | NA |
| Netrakona | Same as above | - | 50-200 | 50 | 100 | 100-150, including consultation and medicine | 100-200 | NA |
| Maulvibazar | Same as above | - | 50-200 | 20-50 | 100 | NA | 200-300 | NA |
| Cox's Bazar | Same as above | - | 100-300 | 20-30 | 100 | Free leprosy treatment | 200-300 | NA |
CAD 1=Tk 65 approximately;
*Includes both consultation and medication fees;
**Consultation fee only, which is higher than the fees of Baddya;
***Rangamati, Khagrachhari, and Bandarban are within the greater Chittagong Hill Tracts;
†The amount is calculated based on cost of surgery, laboratory, and bed-days. Table indicates costs for most frequent usage;
CAD=Canadian dollar;
DH =District hospital;
NA=Not applicable;
NGO=Non-governmental organization;
TBA=Traditional birth attendant;
UHC=Upazila Health Complex;
UHFWC=Upazila Health and Family Welfare Centre