Literature DB >> 23082390

Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching.

Jelena Juloski1, Cecilia Goracci, Carlo Rengo, Agostino Giovannetti, Alessandro Vichi, Zoran R Vulicevic, Marco Ferrari.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of preliminary phosphoric acid-etching on shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel and dentin of a self-adhering restorative composite and of a new self-etch adhesive used in combination with the proprietary flowable composite.
METHODS: 100 human molars were selected. SBS was assessed on flat buccal enamel surfaces and mid-coronal dentin. Teeth from each group were divided into five subgroups (n=10): (1) FL: etch-and-rinse adhesive OptiBond FL/Premise flowable; (2) XTR: 2-step self-etch adhesive OptiBond XTR/Premise flowable; (3) eXTR: OptiBond XTR on etched substrates/Premise flowable; (4) VF: self-adhering flowable composite Vertise Flow; (5) eVF: Vertise Flow on etched substrates. Specimens were stressed in shear until failure. Failure modes were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher's exact test (P< 0.05).
RESULTS: Dental substrate, material and between-factor interaction significantly influenced SBS (MPa). In FL group (16.83 +/- 2.93) significantly higher SBS to enamel than in the other groups (XTR 8.59 +/- 4.39; eXTR 7.04 +/- 3.63; VF 6.61 +/- 2,41; eVF 9.87 +/- 4.24) was measured. On dentin FL (8.15 +/- 3.88) performed similarly to XTR (10.60 +/- 5.0), eXTR (9.60 +/- 4.91) and eVF (5.48 +/- 4.94); VF recorded significantly lower SBS (2.94 +/- 2.79 MPa). Failure modes differed significantly among groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23082390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  7 in total

1.  Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques.

Authors:  Vania Stephanie Sánchez Gamarra; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Júnior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage?

Authors:  Abeer Abo El Naga; Mohammed Yousef; Rasha Ramadan; Sherif Fayez Bahgat; Lana Alshawwa
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2015-03-27

3.  Tensile Bond Strengths of Two Adhesives on Irradiated and Nonirradiated Human Dentin.

Authors:  Cécile Bernard; Cyril Villat; Hazem Abouelleil; Marie-Paule Gustin; Brigitte Grosgogeat
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Microtensile Bond Strength and Failure Modes of Flowable Composites on Primary Dentin with Application of Different Adhesive Strategies.

Authors:  Simge Durmuşlar; Ayşegül Ölmez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Evaluation of the Effects of Bromelain and Papain Enzymes on Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Enamel.

Authors:  Farahnaz Sharafeddin; Mohammad Hossein Yazdanpanah; Zahra Jowkar
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-12

6.  Evaluating the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin with or without etching: A comparative study between dimethacrylate-based and silorane-based adhesives.

Authors:  Hila Hajizadeh; Atefeh Nemati-Karimooy; Atefeh Nasseh; Naim Rahmanpour
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-12-01

7.  Evaluation of Newly Introduced Bioactive Materials in Terms of Cavity Floor Adaptation: OCT Study.

Authors:  Heba B Abdel-Maksoud; Aziza W Bahanan; Lujain J Alkhattabi; Turki A Bakhsh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.