Using transcranial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to measure changes in the redox state of cerebral cytochrome c oxidase (Δ[oxCCO]) during functional activation in healthy adults is hampered by instrumentation and algorithm issues. This study reports the Δ[oxCCO] response measured in such a setting and investigates possible confounders of this measurement. Continuous frontal lobe NIRS measurements were collected from 11 healthy volunteers during a 6-minute anagram-solving task, using a hybrid optical spectrometer (pHOS) that combines multi-distance frequency and broadband components. Only data sets showing a hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation were interrogated for a Δ[oxCCO] response. Simultaneous systemic monitoring data were also available. Possible influences on the Δ[oxCCO] response were systematically investigated and there was no effect of: 1) wavelength range chosen for fitting the measured attenuation spectra; 2) constant or measured, with the pHOS in real-time, differential pathlength factor; 3) systemic hemodynamic changes during functional activation; 4) changes in optical scattering during functional activation. The Δ[oxCCO] response measured in the presence of functional activation was heterogeneous, with the majority of subjects showing significant increase in oxidation, but others having a decrease. We conclude that the heterogeneity in the Δ[oxCCO] response is physiological and not induced by confounding factors in the measurements.
Using transcranial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to measure changes in the redox state of cerebral cytochrome c oxidase (Δ[oxCCO]) during functional activation in healthy adults is hampered by instrumentation and algorithm issues. This study reports the Δ[oxCCO] response measured in such a setting and investigates possible confounders of this measurement. Continuous frontal lobe NIRS measurements were collected from 11 healthy volunteers during a 6-minute anagram-solving task, using a hybrid optical spectrometer (pHOS) that combines multi-distance frequency and broadband components. Only data sets showing a hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation were interrogated for a Δ[oxCCO] response. Simultaneous systemic monitoring data were also available. Possible influences on the Δ[oxCCO] response were systematically investigated and there was no effect of: 1) wavelength range chosen for fitting the measured attenuation spectra; 2) constant or measured, with the pHOS in real-time, differential pathlength factor; 3) systemic hemodynamic changes during functional activation; 4) changes in optical scattering during functional activation. The Δ[oxCCO] response measured in the presence of functional activation was heterogeneous, with the majority of subjects showing significant increase in oxidation, but others having a decrease. We conclude that the heterogeneity in the Δ[oxCCO] response is physiological and not induced by confounding factors in the measurements.
Entities:
Keywords:
(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology; (170.1610) Clinical applications; (170.2655) Functional monitoring and imaging; (170.5380) Physiology; (170.6510) Spectroscopy, tissue diagnostics; (300.6190) Spectrometers
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a widely used optical method of monitoring,
non-invasively and with good time resolution, regional changes in chromophore concentration in
various types of biological tissue, including the adult brain [1-4]. NIRS can provide information not
only about cerebral oxygen delivery, via measured concentration changes of oxygenated
(Δ[HbO2]) and deoxygenated haemoglobin (Δ[HHb]), but, with suitable
instrumentation and algorithms [5,6], also about local cellular oxygen metabolism, via measuring concentration
changes of oxidised cytochrome c oxidase (Δ[oxCCO]).Cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) is the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial
respiratory chain and catalyses over 95% of oxygen metabolism. It contains four redox-active
metal centres, of which the copper A (CuA) centre has a distinct redox-sensitive
absorbance band in the near infrared [7]. In the short
term the total concentration of CCO does not change, consequently changes in the NIRS-obtained
Δ[oxCCO] signal track changes in the CCO redox state. The CCO redox state is a complex
function of the delivery of redox substrates (oxygen, NADH) into mitochondria and the magnitude
of the mitochondrial proton electrochemical potential that drives ATP synthesis [8]. The Δ[oxCCO] signal - appropriately interpreted with
the aid of mathematical modelling (BRAINSIGNALS model [9])
- can therefore be used as a non-invasive marker of changes in mitochondrial oxygen consumption
and utilisation. Because of this capacity, it provides an appealing target for clinical
monitoring, with the potential to aid the early detection of regional ischemia and guide
subsequent therapeutic interventions.The transcranial NIRS measurement of Δ[oxCCO] in the adult brain, in the presence of
significantly higher concentrations of haemoglobin, poses certain technical challenges. Possible
interference of changes in optical scattering with the NIRS measurements [5,6] and insufficient separation of the
chromophores by the algorithm used to convert optical density into changes in chromophore
concentration [5,6,10-13] are the most frequently mentioned confounding effects. Despite these issues,
several studies have reported Δ[oxCCO] measurements in the adult brain in a variety of
settings, including visual stimulation [12,14], traumatic brain injury [15], manipulation of cerebral oxygen delivery [16,17], orthostatic hypotension [18], cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery [19] and obstructive sleep apnoea [20].A hybrid optical spectrometer (pHOS) and associated algorithm designed to address the
aforementioned technical issues have been recently developed by our group [21]. The pHOS combines multi-distance frequency and broadband spectrometers,
and allows for measurements of light absorption and scattering at discrete wavelengths, together
with multi-distance broadband near-infrared light attenuation measurements.Neurovascular coupling refers to the mechanism describing the tight coupling between local
cerebral neuronal activity and subsequent changes in cerebral blood flow to meet local oxygen
demand [1]. It is these local changes in cerebral
hemodynamics and oxygenation that can be measured by NIRS. Functional activation through anagram
solving induces bilateral frontal hemodynamic response detected by NIRS as an increase in
HbO2 concentration and a decrease in HHb concentration [1]. This scenario provides an excellent paradigm for an NIRS study and the
activated part of the brain can be monitored with optodes placed over a hairless and
easily-accessible part of the scalp. Therefore, for the purpose of monitoring Δ[oxCCO] in
the healthy adult brain with NIRS in the presence of increased brain activity, anagram solving
provides a convenient setting [22]. Confounding
task-induced systemic changes need to be measured simultaneously since they could affect the
NIRS signals [23-26].The aim of this study was to use the pHOS to investigate the response of Δ[oxCCO] to
frontal lobe functional activation in healthy adult volunteers. In order to explore this aim the
objectives of this study were 1) to measure the Δ[oxCCO] response in different layers of
the head using multi-distance broadband spectroscopy in the presence of a hemodynamic response
consistent with frontal lobe activation and 2) to investigate systematically multiple possible
confounds of these measurements.
2. Methods
2.1. Study population and protocol
Eleven healthy volunteers participated in the study (7 male; age range 21-34 years). Ten
subjects were right-handed. The study was approved by the UCL Ethics Committee and written
informed consent was obtained from all subjects.All volunteers were seated in a comfortable position. An anagram exercise protocol previously
described by our group was followed [27,28]. Briefly, data were continuously collected during a
2-minute baseline, followed by a sequence of 1 minute of 4-letter anagrams and 1 minute of
7-letter anagrams, each repeated three times, and concluded by another 2-minute baseline. The
total duration of the recordings was therefore 10 minutes. The subjects were encouraged to
solve as many anagrams as possible, without verbalising the solutions.
2.2. Instrumentation
The pHOS has been described elsewhere [21,29,30]. Briefly, it
consists of a dual-channel frequency domain (FD) spectrometer and two single-channel broadband
spectrometers. The FD component of the pHOS is a modified commercially available system (ISS
Oximeter, model 96208, ISS Inc, Champaign, IL, USA) operating at a modulation frequency of 110
MHz. Light is emitted at wavelengths 690, 750, 790 and 850 nm and two source-detector
separations (3.0 and 3.5 cm) are available. The instrument measures the mean value, amplitude
and phase shift of the modulated light intensity for the two different source-detector
separations at each wavelength. These measurements are subsequently used for quantifying the
absorption (μa) and reduced scattering (μs′)
coefficients of the measured tissue [31].Each broadband spectrometer of the pHOS utilises a 50W halogen bulb as a white light source
and a filter is implemented to reduce the effect of high temperature. After passing through a
configuration of lenses, the light is detected by a CCD camera (Pixis 512, Princeton
Instruments, Trenton, NJ, USA) with chip dimensions 12.3x12.3 mm (512x512 pixels). Through four
detector fibres with different diameters and oval cross-section, the light is directed to four
detectors situated at distances 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 cm away from the light source. The
optical bandwidth of the broadband spectrometers is 504-1068 nm with wavelength resolution of 4
nm.Each of the two optodes of the pHOS incorporates one channel of the FD system with a
broadband channel. This configuration leads to the two long source-detector separations (3.0
and 3.5 cm) being the same for each broadband and FD channel, with each broadband channel
having available two additional shorter source-detector separations (2.0 and 2.5 cm).
Recordings in the two pHOS channels occur in parallel, but within each channel the FD and
broadband measurements are taken sequentially, with the FD system providing the trigger. Each
measurement cycle consists of one broadband measurement followed by four FD measurements,
resulting in a cycle length of 3.2 s.With the ability to interrogate the same tissue segment simultaneously for
μa and μs′ and for broadband light attenuation
data, combined with the ability to perform these measurements at multiple source-detector
separations, the pHOS may provide optical data that can help resolve most of the technical
issues commonly hampering Δ[oxCCO] measurements.
2.3. Measurements
All pHOS measurements were obtained unilaterally on the right side of the forehead throughout
the protocol, with optodes placed over the Fp2, according to the 10-20 system of electrode
placement [32]. Simultaneously, arterial blood pressure
(BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured with a Portapres® system (Finapres Medical
Systems, The Netherlands). Scalp blood flow (LD Flux) was also monitored with a laser Doppler
probe placed on the forehead (Moor Instruments, UK).
2.4. Data analysis
All data analysis was performed in Matlab (version R2010b, Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).The modified Beer-Lambert law was used to determine changes in Δ[HbO2],
Δ[HHb] and Δ[oxCCO], based on measured changes in broadband near-infrared light
attenuation. The concentration calculations were undertaken for each of the four single
source-detector combinations throughout rest, anagram exercise and recovery continuously. A
least-squares fitting procedure (UCLn algorithm [33])
was implemented for these calculations over two different wavelength ranges, 740-900 nm and
780-900 nm. The UCLn algorithm is based on multiple linear regression analysis, utilising the
Beer-Lambert law to determine the best fit of the chromophore specific extinction coefficients,
ε, to the measured attenuation changes, ΔA, over n number of wavelengths,
λ:The specific extinction coefficient spectra used to resolve Δ[HbO2],
Δ[HHb] and Δ[oxCCO] are provided as online supplementary material (see
Media
1).Differential pathlength factor (DPF) falls with increasing wavelength and this wavelength
dependence was taken into account in all four broadband detectors [34]. DPF was assumed to be constant and equal to 6.26 for the two broadband
detectors proximal to the light source [35]. At the
location of the two distal detectors, time-varying DPF was derived from the FD measurements
using the μa and μs′ measured at 690, 750, 790 and
850 nm [31]. From these DPF calculations, the
time-varying DPF measured at 790 nm was used for the concentration calculations of the two
distal broadband detectors. For these detectors the concentration calculations were repeated
assuming DPF constant and equal to the first baseline value of the aforementioned time-varying
DPF series.The calculated chromophore concentration changes, together with the μa,
μs′, DPF and the systemic data were resampled every 3s and the
derived concentration data were linearly detrended to remove possible baseline drifts.
Subsequently all data were processed with a low-pass 5th order Butterworth filter with a
cut-off frequency of 0.08Hz.There was a total of 4 data sets for analysis from each subject, corresponding to four
source-detector separations. To select representative data during baseline and activation,
suitable baseline and activation periods had to be determined for data averaging. The
activation period for Δ[HbO2] was defined as the 60-second window of max
Δ[HbO2] increase with respect to baseline. The Δ[HHb] and
Δ[oxCCO] traces were subsequently scanned separately for the 60-second window of maximum
change with respect to baseline. The search areas for these windows were tied to the
Δ[HbO2] activation window, with the windows allowed to start as early as 57
s prior the start of the Δ[HbO2] window and end as late as 57 s after the end
of the Δ[HbO2] window (Fig. 1
). All activation windows were set to remain entirely inside the anagram exercise period,
by not allowing the windows to start prior to the onset of the exercise and end after the
finish of the exercise (Fig. 1). Averages for the
systemic and scattering data during activation were also calculated inside the CCO activation
window. The baseline period was defined for all parameters as the 60-second window immediately
prior to the onset of the anagram exercise. For all parameters “response” is
defined as the difference between activation and baseline.
Fig. 1
Selection of baseline and activation time windows for the three chromophores. For all
chromophores the baseline window was the 60-second window just before the subject started
solving anagrams. The activation window for HbO2 was the 60-second window of
maximum Δ[HbO2] increase with respect to baseline. The search area for the
middle of this window was any time during the anagram exercise, except for the first and
last 30 seconds. The activation windows for CCO and HHb were the 60-second windows of
maximum Δ[HHb] and Δ[oxCCO] response with respect to baseline. The search
areas for the centres of both windows were tied to the HbO2 activation window and
were set to start as early as 27 seconds before the beginning of the HbO2 window
and end as late as 27 seconds after its end.
Selection of baseline and activation time windows for the three chromophores. For all
chromophores the baseline window was the 60-second window just before the subject started
solving anagrams. The activation window for HbO2 was the 60-second window of
maximum Δ[HbO2] increase with respect to baseline. The search area for the
middle of this window was any time during the anagram exercise, except for the first and
last 30 seconds. The activation windows for CCO and HHb were the 60-second windows of
maximum Δ[HHb] and Δ[oxCCO] response with respect to baseline. The search
areas for the centres of both windows were tied to the HbO2 activation window and
were set to start as early as 27 seconds before the beginning of the HbO2 window
and end as late as 27 seconds after its end.In order to ensure that only Δ[oxCCO] traces concomitant with increased brain activity
were interrogated, only subjects showing hemodynamic response consistent with functional
activation (a statistically significant increase in Δ[HbO2] and a
simultaneous, statistically significant decrease or no response of Δ[HHb] [1]) were entered into the analysis described in this
study.The UCLn algorithm was also used to derive changes in chromophore concentrations when
resolving for 2 chromophores only (HbO2 and HHb) [33]. Attenuation-change spectra (change in attenuation over the wavelength range
resolved) for both 2- and 3-chromophore fits were back-calculated from the concentration
changes derived from the UCLn algorithm (prior to detrending or filtering), at all sampling
points falling within the activation window of Δ[oxCCO].
2.5. Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was carried out in SPSS (v 18.0, IBM, NY, USA). Student’s
unpaired t-tests were used to compare, for all parameters, the means of the selected baseline
and activation points. Responses between the four detectors were compared using analysis of
variance with repeated measures followed by contrast analysis. Linear regression analysis was
performed separately for each detector to investigate, over all subjects, possible relations
between various parameters. Average data are expressed as mean ± SD and statistical
significance was set to p<0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Hemodynamic response and choice of channels
Out of 11 subjects, 8 showed hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation (as
defined in the Methods section) and within each subject there was excellent agreement between
the 4 detectors. Only 1 of the 8 subjects showed a discrepancy between detectors, in the
directional changes in HbO2 and HHb. Figure 2
shows the grand average of the Δ[HbO2] and Δ[HHb] time courses
over these 8 subjects for all detectors.
Fig. 2
Grand averages of the time course of Δ[HbO2] and Δ[HHb] over the
8 subjects that showed hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation. The
vertical lines at 120 s and 480 s denote the onset and end of anagram exercise. (a):
detector 1 (furthest detector); (b): detector 2; (c): detector 3; (d): detector 4.
Grand averages of the time course of Δ[HbO2] and Δ[HHb] over the
8 subjects that showed hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation. The
vertical lines at 120 s and 480 s denote the onset and end of anagram exercise. (a):
detector 1 (furthest detector); (b): detector 2; (c): detector 3; (d): detector 4.Systemic data were not available for 1 out of 8 subjects.
3.2. Multi-distance response of Δ[HbO2]
Figure 3
shows separately for each detector the Δ[HbO2] response to functional
activation from each subject. On average, the Δ[HbO2] response over all 8
subjects that showed hemodynamic response was 1.2 ± 1.0 μmolar (detector 1), 1.8
± 1.2 μmolar (detector 2), 2.3 ± 1.4 μmolar (detector 3) and 2.8
± 2.1 μmolar (detector 4), from the detector furthest to the detector nearest to
the source. Within each subject the response tended to be smaller for larger source-detector
separations and on average it was statistically significantly different between detectors 1-2
and 2-3, but not between 3 and 4. The average time to-peak-response from the onset of anagram
exercise was 153.3 ± 35.2 s, 138.7 ± 26.2 s, 138.8 ± 24.9 s and 144.8
± 34.1 s, from the distal to the proximal detector with no statistically significant
difference between detectors.
Fig. 3
Response of Δ[HbO2] between baseline and activation for each of the four
detectors. Each symbol corresponds to a different subject, in agreement with Fig. 4, 5 and 6. det1-4 denotes detector number, as indicated in the
legend. No hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation was recorded in
detectors 3 and 4 for subject “X”.
Response of Δ[HbO2] between baseline and activation for each of the four
detectors. Each symbol corresponds to a different subject, in agreement with Fig. 4, 5 and 6. det1-4 denotes detector number, as indicated in the
legend. No hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation was recorded in
detectors 3 and 4 for subject “X”.
Fig. 4
Attenuation-change spectra back-calculated from the calculated concentration changes at
peak Δ[oxCCO] response for different subjects. The presented spectra are the average
of all spectra falling within the window of peak Δ[oxCCO] activation. The difference
between the 3 and the 2-chromophore fit is plotted. All data are from the furthest
detector. The symbols at the top left-hand-side corner of each plot indicate the
correspondence with Fig. 3, 5 and 6.
Fig. 5
Response of Δ[oxCCO] between baseline and activation for each of the four
detectors. Each symbol corresponds to a different subject, consistent with Fig. 3, 4 and 6. det1-4 denotes detector number, as indicated in the
legend. All responses were statistically significant.
Fig. 6
Examples of the individual time-courses of Δ[HbO2] and Δ[oxCCO]
for two subjects. (a): Δ[oxCCO] increased during functional activation (detector 1)
and (b): Δ[oxCCO] decreased (detector 2). The signals are presented after being
filtered with a Butterworth filter and smoothed with a 60-second sliding average window, as
described in the Methods. The vertical lines at 120 s and 480 s denote the onset and end of
anagram exercise. The symbols at the top left-hand-side corner of each plot indicate the
correspondence with Fig. 3, 4 and 5. See
Media
2.
3.3. Possible influencing factors on the Δ[oxCCO] measurements
Potential influencing factors on the Δ[oxCCO] measurements were explored on the data
from the furthest detector, unless explicitly stated otherwise. This choice was driven by the
fact that measurements from the furthest detector are more likely to reflect cerebral
changes.
3.3.1. Wavelength range
For the furthest detector, the overall averages of the time courses of
Δ[HbO2], Δ[HHb] and Δ[oxCCO] in all 8 subjects were
calculated twice, once for wavelength range 740-900 nm and once for 780-900 nm. Comparison for
each chromophore of the average time course for the two wavelength ranges, suggested no effect
of the selected wavelength range on the calculation of the concentration changes . Based on
these results and in accordance with previously published data from our group, only results
from the 780-900 nm wavelength range are discussed throughout this study, unless explicitly
stated otherwise [10,15,16].
3.3.2. Analysis of the 2- and 3-chromophore fit spectra
The back-calculated attenuation-change spectra from the furthest detector are shown in Fig. 4
as the difference between the 3 and the 2-chromophore fit for the 8 subjects showing
the required hemodynamic response. It is noted that the spectrum presented for each subject is
an average spectrum, derived from all individual spectra corresponding to the 60-second
Δ[oxCCO] peak activation window. The spectra do not have an arbitrary distribution
around y = 0, but appear to show a shape approximating the oxidised minus reduced CCO
spectrum, featuring a broad peak at approximately 820 nm. This suggests that fitting the
measured changes in near-infrared attenuation only for HHb and HbO2 would leave a
chromophore with the spectral features of CCO unaccounted for.Attenuation-change spectra back-calculated from the calculated concentration changes at
peak Δ[oxCCO] response for different subjects. The presented spectra are the average
of all spectra falling within the window of peak Δ[oxCCO] activation. The difference
between the 3 and the 2-chromophore fit is plotted. All data are from the furthest
detector. The symbols at the top left-hand-side corner of each plot indicate the
correspondence with Fig. 3, 5 and 6.Based on these findings only results from the 3-chromophre fit are discussed throughout this
study, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
3.3.3. Pathlength
For the two furthest detectors, using a time-variant DPF or a constant DPF made no
statistically significant difference in the individual time traces of
Δ[HbO2], Δ[HHb] and Δ[oxCCO] in any subject, neither in terms
of amplitude of response nor in terms of time to-peak-response (data not shown). Based on
these findings all results discussed throughout this study for the two furthest detectors are
for time-varying DPF, unless explicitly stated otherwise.The pathlengths used for the concentration calculations in each detector are given in Table 1
. For the two furthest detectors where time-varying DPF was used, on average over
the 8 subjects there was no statistically significant difference between the baseline and
activation DPF value used for the concentration calculations.
Table 1
Pathlength, presented as DPF x distance (group data, n = 8)
Detector
1
Detector
2
Baseline
In CCO activation
window
Baseline
In CCO activation
window
Detector 3
Detector 4
(8.0 ± 0.5) x3.5 cm
(8.1 ± 0.5) x3.5 cm
(8.0 ± 0.5) x3.0 cm
(8.1 ± 0.5) x3.0 cm
6.26 x2.5 cm
6.26 x2.0 cm
Time-variant DPF derived from the FD measurements was used for the two detectors furthest
away from the source (1 and 2). Mean pathlength values corresponding to the baseline and CCO
activation windows are presented in the table. For detectors 3 and 4 constant DPF was
used.
3.3.4. Concomitant systemic hemodynamic changes
A potential confounding effect of task-induced systemic changes on the Δ[oxCCO]
response was explored by investigating possible associations between the amplitude of
Δ[oxCCO] response with the corresponding changes in BP, HR and LD Flux calculated
within the same baseline and activation windows as Δ[oxCCO]. No significant correlation
was found with any systemic parameters in any detector, with a mean correlation coefficient of
R = 0.5 for BP, R = 0.30 for LD Flux and R = 0.20 for HR.
3.3.5. Concomitant changes in optical scattering
The response of Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation was not statistically significantly
related to the corresponding response of μs′ in any detector, neither
at 790 nm nor at 850 nm (data not shown). Linear regression analysis revealed no statistically
significant correlations, with an average R-value over all detectors of R = 0.28 for 790 nm
and R = 0.16 for 850 nm.
3.4. Multi-distance response of Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation
The response of Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation is shown in Fig. 5
for each detector and separately for each subject. All Δ[oxCCO] responses were
statistically significant. A heterogeneous response was found between subjects, with the
majority exhibiting an increase in Δ[oxCCO] during functional activation but with some
clearly showing a significant decrease. Within the same subject there was good agreement in the
directional change of Δ[oxCCO] between detectors.Response of Δ[oxCCO] between baseline and activation for each of the four
detectors. Each symbol corresponds to a different subject, consistent with Fig. 3, 4 and 6. det1-4 denotes detector number, as indicated in the
legend. All responses were statistically significant.Figure 6
shows examples of the individual time-courses of Δ[HbO2] and
Δ[oxCCO] from two subjects, one case where Δ[oxCCO] increased during functional
activation (p<0.0001) and another case where Δ[oxCCO] decreased (p<0.0001). The
individual time-courses of Δ[HbO2], Δ[HHb] and Δ[oxCCO] from all subjects
are provided in the online supplement, as supplementary Fig.
1.Examples of the individual time-courses of Δ[HbO2] and Δ[oxCCO]
for two subjects. (a): Δ[oxCCO] increased during functional activation (detector 1)
and (b): Δ[oxCCO] decreased (detector 2). The signals are presented after being
filtered with a Butterworth filter and smoothed with a 60-second sliding average window, as
described in the Methods. The vertical lines at 120 s and 480 s denote the onset and end of
anagram exercise. The symbols at the top left-hand-side corner of each plot indicate the
correspondence with Fig. 3, 4 and 5. See
Media
2.
4. Discussion
A heterogeneous response of Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation was measured, with the
majority of the participants demonstrating a statistically significant increase in
Δ[oxCCO] during anagram solving and others a statistically significant decrease.The paradigm of brain functional activation through anagram solving was selected because of
its ease of application in an NIRS study and its reliability in inducing functional
activation-related changes in the healthy adult brain. Using instrumentation appropriate for CCO
redox state measurements, we were able to detect significant changes in Δ[oxCCO] in all
channels that showed a hemodynamic response. The directional change in Δ[oxCCO] was
heterogeneous with some subjects showing an increase and others a decrease (Fig. 5). Thorough analysis was undertaken to ensure that only data sets
exhibiting hemodynamic response consistent with functional activation were interrogated for a
Δ[oxCCO] response and to further ensure the step-by-step exclusion of all factors that
could have a confounding effect on the CCO redox state measurements. The heterogeneity in the
directionality of the Δ[oxCCO] response therefore appears to be physiological.Such heterogeneous response of Δ[oxCCO] (Fig. 5)
is not reported in the few existing NIRS functional activation studies investigating CCO [12,14]. Through NIRS
measurements over the occipital lobe, Heekeren et al. showed an increase in the concentration of
oxidised CCO during passive visual stimulation (10 s of stimulation followed by 30 s of rest),
in the presence of qualitatively similar but quantitatively considerably smaller changes in
Δ[HbO2] and Δ[HHb] compared to the present study [14]. Some degree of heterogeneity in the response of
Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation, entirely masked in the group results, was found in the
study of Uludağ et al. [12]. The authors
implemented an elaborate protocol of passive blob (high CCO content) and interblob (low CCO
content) stimulation for the purpose of investigating the influence of haemoglobin cross-talk on
the detected Δ[oxCCO] responses. While not the primary purpose of the study and not
commented on by the authors, a significant decrease in the concentration of oxidised CCO was
detected in a few individuals, even though on average the concentration of oxidised CCO
increased. Since our study and others target different cortical areas and use dissimilar
stimulation protocols, a direct comparison is not prudent. Although the Δ[oxCCO] response
in our study is suggestive of a group overall increase in the concentration of oxidised CCO
during frontal functional activation (P = NS in all detectors), there is no good reason to
believe that the decrease observed in some subjects is not a real physiological response.Such heterogeneity in the Δ[oxCCO] response was somewhat surprising, since other
studies conducted by our group using broadband spectroscopy in healthy volunteers, and with a
similar measuring site and the same algorithms to the present study, detected group significant
changes in Δ[oxCCO] during a variety of protocols inducing global changes in cerebral
hemodynamics via manipulation of cerebral oxygen delivery. Tisdall et al. [16] found a significant decrease of 0.24 μmolar (median, P<0.01) in
Δ[oxCCO] during hypoxia (decrease of SaO2 to 80%). Tachtsidis et al. [17] found a significant increase of 0.09 ± 0.12
μmolar (P<0.05) in Δ[oxCCO] with hyperoxia (increased inspired oxygen
concentration to 100%). During hypercapnia, the same authors found an increase in
Δ[oxCCO] of 0.25 ± 0.17 μmolar (P<0.005). It therefore seems unlikely
that the heterogeneous response of Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation observed in the
present study could be induced by factors other than the protocol of functional activation
per se.The major contribution to the Δ[oxCCO] signal is changes in the redox state of the
CuA centre. The expected response of the redox state of CuA to functional
activation is not theoretically predictable [8]. An
increase in ATP turnover will increase mitochondrial ADP and decrease the magnitude of the
mitochondrial membrane potential. When CCO is studied in isolation, given the position of the
CuA centre in the membrane, dropping the membrane potential causes increase in
oxidation as the rate of electron exit from CuA is enhanced [36]. However, in the whole mitochondrion or cell, the membrane potential acts
on multiple sites of the electron transfer chain simultaneously. It is entirely possible that
effects elsewhere could result in an increased reduction rate for CuA and therefore
cancel out this effect. Indeed, in isolated mitochondria the cytochrome c redox
state (which is in close redox equilibrium to and hence tracks the CuA redox state)
can be oxidised or reduced depending on the fine details of the mitochondrial system being
studied [37].The situation is even more complicated in our experimental paradigm as two other factors are
affected by functional activation. Oxygen levels can increase due to the increase in blood flow,
and NADH levels can increase due to activation of citric acid cycle dehydrogenases. These
factors act in opposite ways; increases in NADH can cause an increase in CuA
reduction, whereas oxygen increases can cause an oxidation [8]. Slight physiological or biochemical differences of an individual may therefore
change the direction of the CuA response.Furthermore, mitochondrial redox systems can have significant spatial and temporal variations
in their response to stimulation. This is best illustrated with fluorescence measurements of
NADH [38]. It has been shown in brain slices that
stimulation causes an initial oxidation of NADH followed by a reduction. The strength of the two
responses differs depending on the time and region being measured. This has implications for our
study. It is possible that near-infrared light interrogates somewhat different regions of the
cortex in different subjects; in this case the difference in spatial sensitivity could explain
whether we see an oxidation or a reduction in CuA, rather than a fundamental
difference in the underlying biochemistry or physiology.Use of a mathematical model of cerebral circulation and metabolism developed in our group
could aid the interpretation of the measured heterogeneous Δ[oxCCO] changes in each
individual [9]. The model has been designed for the
interpretation of experimental data and can reproduce basic mechanisms of cerebral physiology.
Receiving a number of measured variables as input, it is able to generate as output a close
likeness of other variables that were not used as input but were measured nonetheless. Most
importantly, it is also able to predict variables that cannot be measured, providing an
immensely helpful tool in the interpretation of physiological data.In the light of the heterogeneous response of CCO measured in our study, we used this model to
explore the predicted response of CCO to functional activation (modelled as a 30% increase in
demand, causing a ~5% increase in CMRO2).The model allows for the possibility of changing the NAD/NADH ratio via varying the model
parameter D_NADH (see supplementary Fig. 2 for details).
This represents a change in glycolytic TCA cycle flux during functional activation [39]. Such a change can affect both the magnitude and direction
of the Δ[oxCCO] response [9]. Figure 7(a)
shows that a relatively small change in the NAD/NADH ratio from 9.0 to 8.1 can change the
Δ[oxCCO] response from an oxidation to a reduction; the direction of the Δ[HbO2]
and Δ[HHb] responses remains unaffected.
Fig. 7
Modelling of NIRS changes following functional activation. The BRAINSIGNALS model was used
[9]. Functional activation was modelled as a 30%
increase in demand (parameter change from 1 to 1.3). (a): Model parameter D_NADH was varied
with respect to its normal value in the model and the accompanying optical changes and
NAD/NADH ratios plotted. (b): Model parameter ck1 was varied with respect to its normal value
in the model and the accompanying optical changes plotted. See Media 3.
Modelling of NIRS changes following functional activation. The BRAINSIGNALS model was used
[9]. Functional activation was modelled as a 30%
increase in demand (parameter change from 1 to 1.3). (a): Model parameter D_NADH was varied
with respect to its normal value in the model and the accompanying optical changes and
NAD/NADH ratios plotted. (b): Model parameter ck1 was varied with respect to its normal value
in the model and the accompanying optical changes plotted. See Media 3.Internal properties of the mitochondrial electron transfer chain, in particular its response
to changes in the proton motive force, can also alter the direction of a redox state change
following functional activation [8]. To illustrate this we
varied the parameter in the model that controls how sensitive the rate of NADH oxidation is to
the proton motive force (parameter ck1-see supplementary Fig.
2 for details). Figure 7(b) illustrates how
varying this internal parameter can cause a switch in the Δ[oxCCO] response to functional
activation, despite only a very modest increase in CMRO2. Again, the direction of the
Δ[HbO2] and Δ[HHb] responses remains unaffected.These examples illustrate that the direction of the Δ[oxCCO] response to functional
activation can vary between individuals even if other measured signals appear identical. This
confirms that it is not implausible that genuine physiological variations account for the
heterogeneous response of Δ[oxCCO] observed in our population. Interestingly, a
heterogeneous response of CCO to reperfusion after cerebral ischemia has been used as a
discriminator of pathophysiology [40].Without being the primary finding of the present study, the Δ[HbO2] time
to-peak-response that we measured is worthy of comment as it might appear at first glance to be
rather long compared to that seen in other functional activation studies. The hemodynamic
response to cerebral functional activation is highly variable in terms of time, amplitude and
predictability, depending among other factors on the activated area and the task used to
activate it [41]. Therefore, in the first instance only
comparisons of our study with those involving frontal anagram-evoked stimulation and activation
in healthy adults would seem judicious [24,27,28,42-44].
Furthermore, because participants in the present study were subjected to an unusually prolonged
task, only studies with similar task duration are considered in the comparison [24,27,28]. In this context, the time to-peak-response found in the
present study is of the same order of magnitude as reported in other studies (~1 min), albeit
longer.A tendency for the detectors further away from the source to identify a larger Δ[oxCCO]
response, compared to the detectors closer to the source, was present in our data. The furthest
detectors have higher depth sensitivity than the closer detectors and therefore interrogate more
brain tissue. Because CCO is present in higher concentrations in the brain compared to skin
[45], such incremental Δ[oxCCO] response with
increasing source-detector separation is to be expected.In cerebral functional activation studies, concerns about simultaneous task-evoked changes in
scalp hemodynamics interfering with and obscuring the NIRS signals from the deeper layers are
common [23-25,27,28]. Although hemodynamic fluctuations in the scalp due to task-induced changes in heart
rate and blood pressure introduce physiological noise in the NIRS signals, changes in scalp
perfusion are difficult to unravel from the actual changes in cerebral perfusion. It can be
anticipated that the degree of scalp contamination introduced in the NIRS signals would strongly
depend on whether or not the optodes were placed directly over large scalp vessels, but this
information cannot be retrieved retrospectively in the present study. However, with respect to
Δ[oxCCO] (the primary target of this study), the absence of significant correlations with
the measured systemic variables in terms of amplitude of response indicates that the observed
changes in oxidised CCO concentration are not the effect of interference from the superficial
layers. In any case, the Δ[oxCCO] signal is expected to be less prone to extracerebral
contamination, since CCO is present only in small concentrations in the scalp [46].An experimental study by Schytz et al. [47] suggested
that NIRS data obtained with a multi-distance source-detector configuration can be
decontaminated from the effect of skin blood flow by using the short source-detector separation
measurements (1 cm) to correct the long source-detector separation measurements (3 cm). The
shortest source-detector separation in the pHOS is however 2 cm, a distance long enough for the
detector to pick up some brain signal [48,49], and therefore using these measurements to decontaminate
the 3.0 and 3.5 cm measurements would produce erroneous results. It is also acknowledged that
Monte Carlo simulations in the adult head suggest an error of over 20% in the measurement of
optical absorption using an FD spectrometer with source-detector spacing between 3.0 and 4.5 cm,
induced by the extra-cerebral tissue [50]. From the
practical point of view, we attempted to reduce the interference from the superficial layers by
firm application of the optodes on the forehead and using mostly the recordings from the distal
detector to draw conclusions about the behaviour of CCO during functional activation. The lack
of correlations between Δ[oxCCO] and systemic variables indicates that this approach was
sufficient.We are aware of concerns regarding
the depth sensitivity of NIRS, however we believe that in our study the tissue volume
interrogated by the FD and broadband components could not have been substantially different.
Firstly, because in terms of detector positioning within each pHOS optode, the two long
source-detector separations (3.0 and 3.5 cm) of the FD and broadband components were equivalent.
Secondly, because for the adult human head the difference in the interrogated tissue volume due
to different wavelengths of near-infrared light is very small [51]. Regardless, even if there was some difference in the interrogated tissue volume
between the two modalities, it could not have selectively distorted our findings. Both
Δ[oxCCO] and Δ[HbO2] concentrations were calculated using exactly the
same method; the haemoglobin measurements showed a response consistent with functional
activation and in the presence of this response, we investigated the corresponding
Δ[oxCCO] response.It is obvious from Fig. 5 that two subjects showed a
heterogeneous response of Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation between different detectors.
We cannot exclude the possibility that, in the same subject, due to the different depth
sensitivity of the detectors, the different interrogated regions exhibited different
Δ[oxCCO] response to functional activation. We consider this finding to be an advocate
against averaging data from different detectors.DPF was calculated from μa and μs′ based on a
relationship derived from the diffusion theory assuming a semi-infinite turbid medium [31]. It is possible that differences between the geometry of
this model and the adult head will induce further errors in the calculation of DPF.An effect of haemoglobin cross-talk was not evident in our data. Spectroscopic cross-talk can
arise from the wavelength dependency of the partial photon pathlength of the activated cortical
volume and is demonstrated as a change in one chromophore mimicking the change in another [11,12]. Although we
investigated the effect of functional activation on Δ[oxCCO] only in the presence of a
concomitant increase in Δ[HbO2], the directionality of the Δ[oxCCO]
response was not homogenous, as would be expected if it was solely the result of cross-talk from
the (homogenous) Δ[HbO2] response. Furthermore, linear regression analysis
revealed no statistically significant correlations between the response of Δ[oxCCO] and
Δ[HbO2] or between the response of Δ[oxCCO] and Δ[HbT] =
Δ[HbO2] + Δ[HHb], with an average R-value over all detectors of R =
0.21 for Δ[HbO2] and R = 0.16 for Δ[HbT].In future studies, the option to induce frontal lobe functional activation with a less
prolonged task, which could be repeated several times for each subject, should be considered for
the purpose of investigating the homogeneity of the directional changes in Δ[oxCCO]
within subjects. Finally, the possibility that the prolonged stimulation protocol led to
habituation effects in the present study cannot be excluded.
5. Conclusion
A heterogeneous response of Δ[oxCCO] to functional activation was found, with most
subjects exhibiting an increase in Δ[oxCCO] during anagram solving, but with some showing
a decrease. We suggest that this heterogeneity has a physiological interpretation and is not
induced by confounding factors in the measurements.
Authors: Anne D McGown; Himender Makker; Clare Elwell; Pippa G Al Rawi; Arschang Valipour; Stephen G Spiro Journal: Sleep Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Ilias Tachtsidis; Terence S Leung; Martin M Tisdall; Presheena Devendra; Martin Smith; David T Delpy; Clare E Elwell Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Xinlong Wang; Fenghua Tian; Divya D Reddy; Sahil S Nalawade; Douglas W Barrett; Francisco Gonzalez-Lima; Hanli Liu Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Matthew Caldwell; Tracy Moroz; Tharindi Hapuarachchi; Alan Bainbridge; Nicola J Robertson; Chris E Cooper; Ilias Tachtsidis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240