Literature DB >> 23079266

Concept mapping: priority community strategies to create changes to support active living.

Laura K Brennan1, Ross C Brownson, Cheryl Kelly, Melissa K Ivey, Laura C Leviton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: From 2003 to 2008, a total of 25 cross-sector, multidisciplinary community partnerships funded through the Active Living by Design (ALbD) national program designed, planned, and implemented policy and environmental changes, with complementary programs and promotions.
PURPOSE: This paper describes the use of concept mapping methods to gain insights into promising active living intervention strategies based on the collective experience of community representatives implementing ALbD initiatives.
METHODS: Using Concept Systems software, community representatives (n=43) anonymously generated actions and changes in their communities to support active living (183 original statements, 79 condensed statements). Next, respondents (n=26, from 23 partnerships) sorted the 79 statements into self-created categories, or active living intervention approaches. Respondents then rated statements based on their perceptions of the most important strategies for creating community changes (n=25, from 22 partnerships) and increasing community rates of physical activity (n=23, from 20 partnerships). Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling were used to describe data patterns.
RESULTS: ALbD community partnerships identified three active living intervention approaches with the greatest perceived importance to create community change and increase population levels of physical activity: changes to the built and natural environment, partnership and collaboration efforts, and land-use and transportation policies. The relative importance of intervention approaches varied according to subgroups of partnerships working with different populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision makers, practitioners, and community residents can incorporate what has been learned from the 25 community partnerships to prioritize active living policy, physical project, promotional, and programmatic strategies for work in different populations and settings.
Copyright © 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23079266      PMCID: PMC4766839          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  27 in total

1.  Adolescents' perceptions of environmental influences on physical activity.

Authors:  Amy V Ries; Carolyn C Voorhees; Joel Gittelsohn; Kathleen M Roche; Nan M Astone
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

2.  Promoting active community environments through land use and transportation planning.

Authors:  Semra A Aytur; Daniel A Rodriguez; Kelly R Evenson; Diane J Catellier; Wayne D Rosamond
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

3.  WV Walks: replication with expanded reach.

Authors:  Bill Reger-Nash; Adrian Bauman; Linda Cooper; Tien Chey; Kenneth J Simon; Maria Brann; Kevin M Leyden
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2008-01

4.  Active living for rural youth: addressing physical inactivity in rural communities.

Authors:  Anush Yousefian; Erika Ziller; Jon Swartz; David Hartley
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2009 May-Jun

5.  Environmental and policy approaches for promoting physical activity in the United States: a research agenda.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Cheryl M Kelly; Amy A Eyler; Cheryl Carnoske; Lisa Grost; Susan L Handy; Jay E Maddock; Delores Pluto; Brian A Ritacco; James F Sallis; Thomas L Schmid
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2008-07

6.  Where are youth active? Roles of proximity, active transport, and built environment.

Authors:  Helene Mollie Grow; Brian E Saelens; Jacqueline Kerr; Nefertiti H Durant; Gregory J Norman; James F Sallis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  The Active Living by Design national program: community initiatives and lessons learned.

Authors:  Philip Bors; Mark Dessauer; Rich Bell; Risa Wilkerson; Joanne Lee; Sarah L Strunk
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Evaluation of Active Living by Design: implementation patterns across communities.

Authors:  Laura K Brennan; Ross C Brownson; Peter Hovmand
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Lessons from a mixed-methods approach to evaluating Active Living by Design.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Laura K Brennan; Kelly R Evenson; Laura C Leviton
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Translating research into practice: using concept mapping to determine locally relevant intervention strategies to increase physical activity.

Authors:  Cheryl M Kelly; Elizabeth A Baker; Ross C Brownson; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2007-05-23
View more
  7 in total

1.  Lessons from a mixed-methods approach to evaluating Active Living by Design.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Laura K Brennan; Kelly R Evenson; Laura C Leviton
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Using concept mapping in the development of the EU-PAD framework (EUropean-Physical Activity Determinants across the life course): a DEDIPAC-study.

Authors:  Giancarlo Condello; Fiona Chun Man Ling; Antonino Bianco; Sebastien Chastin; Greet Cardon; Donatella Ciarapica; Daniele Conte; Cristina Cortis; Marieke De Craemer; Andrea Di Blasio; Masar Gjaka; Sylvia Hansen; Michelle Holdsworth; Licia Iacoviello; Pascal Izzicupo; Lina Jaeschke; Liliana Leone; Livia Manoni; Cristina Menescardi; Silvia Migliaccio; Julie-Anne Nazare; Camille Perchoux; Caterina Pesce; Frank Pierik; Tobias Pischon; Angela Polito; Anna Puggina; Alessandra Sannella; Wolfgang Schlicht; Holger Schulz; Chantal Simon; Astrid Steinbrecher; Ciaran MacDonncha; Laura Capranica
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The power of the group: comparison of interviews and group concept mapping for identifying patient-important outcomes of care.

Authors:  Kristin L Rising; Marianna LaNoue; Alexzandra T Gentsch; Amanda M B Doty; Amy Cunningham; Brendan G Carr; Judd E Hollander; Lori Latimer; Larry Loebell; Gail Weingarten; Neva White; Geoffrey Mills
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Composite adverse outcomes in obstetric studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dylan Herman; Kar Yee Lor; Abdul Qadree; Daphne Horn; Rohan D'Souza
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.

Authors:  Eloise Howse; Katherine Cullerton; Anne Grunseit; Erika Bohn-Goldbaum; Adrian Bauman; Becky Freeman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-03-04

6.  A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment.

Authors:  Claire Schiller; Meghan Winters; Heather M Hanson; Maureen C Ashe
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study.

Authors:  Tobias N Bonten; Anneloek Rauwerdink; Jeremy C Wyatt; Marise J Kasteleyn; Leonard Witkamp; Heleen Riper; Lisette Jewc van Gemert-Pijnen; Kathrin Cresswell; Aziz Sheikh; Marlies P Schijven; Niels H Chavannes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.