Literature DB >> 23076830

The evolution of intermittent breeding.

Allison K Shaw1, Simon A Levin.   

Abstract

A central issue in life history theory is how organisms trade off current and future reproduction. A variety of organisms exhibit intermittent breeding, meaning sexually mature adults will skip breeding opportunities between reproduction attempts. It's thought that intermittent breeding occurs when reproduction incurs an extra cost in terms of survival, energy, or recovery time. We have developed a matrix population model for intermittent breeding, and use adaptive dynamics to determine under what conditions individuals should breed at every opportunity, and under what conditions they should skip some breeding opportunities (and if so, how many). We also examine the effect of environmental stochasticity on breeding behavior. We find that the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) for breeding behavior depends on an individual's expected growth and mortality, and that the conditions for skipped breeding depend on the type of reproductive cost incurred (survival, energy, recovery time). In constant environments there is always a pure ESS, however environmental stochasticity and deterministic population fluctuations can both select for a mixed ESS. Finally, we compare our model results to patterns of intermittent breeding in species from a range of taxonomic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23076830     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-012-0603-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  14 in total

1.  The resident strikes back: invader-induced switching of resident attractor.

Authors:  S D Mylius; O Diekmann
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Year class coexistence or competitive exclusion for strict biennials?

Authors:  N V Davydova; O Diekmann; S A van Gils
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  The population consequences of life history phenomena.

Authors:  L C COLE
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 4.875

4.  Capital breeding and income breeding: their meaning, measurement, and worth.

Authors:  Philip A Stephens; Ian L Boyd; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios?

Authors:  J A Metz; R M Nisbet; S A Geritz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas.

Authors:  S C Stearns
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 4.875

7.  Body condition threshold for breeding in a viviparous snake.

Authors:  Guy Naulleau; Xavier Bonnet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Maximizing final yield when growth is limited by time or by limiting resources.

Authors:  D Cohen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Bet-hedging response to environmental variability, an intraspecific comparison.

Authors:  Marie Nevoux; Jaume Forcada; Christophe Barbraud; John Croxall; Henri Weimerskirchi
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Isotope analysis reveals foraging area dichotomy for atlantic leatherback turtles.

Authors:  Stéphane Caut; Sabrina Fossette; Elodie Guirlet; Elena Angulo; Krishna Das; Marc Girondot; Jean-Yves Georges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  On the concept of individual in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  J A J Metz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Mitigating impacts of invasive alien predators on an endangered sea duck amidst high native predation pressure.

Authors:  Kim Jaatinen; Ida Hermansson; Bertille Mohring; Benjamin B Steele; Markus Öst
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Reproductive success delays moult phenology in a polar mammal.

Authors:  Roxanne S Beltran; Amy L Kirkham; Greg A Breed; J Ward Testa; Jennifer M Burns
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic-breeding seabird.

Authors:  Rolanda J Steenweg; Glenn T Crossin; Holly L Hennin; H Grant Gilchrist; Oliver P Love
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Carry-over effects on the annual cycle of a migratory seabird: an experimental study.

Authors:  Annette L Fayet; Robin Freeman; Akiko Shoji; Holly L Kirk; Oliver Padget; Chris M Perrins; Tim Guilford
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Reproductive skipping as an optimal life history strategy in the southern elephant seal, Mirounga leonina.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.