Literature DB >> 23075883

Impact of enhancements in the local effect model (LEM) on the predicted RBE-weighted target dose distribution in carbon ion therapy.

R Grün1, T Friedrich, T Elsässer, M Krämer, K Zink, C P Karger, M Durante, R Engenhart-Cabillic, M Scholz.   

Abstract

Biological optimization for treatment planning in carbon ion therapy is currently based on the first version of the local effect model (LEM I). Further developments implemented in the latest version (LEM IV) allowed to predict more accurately the Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) in-vitro. The main goal of this study is to compare the LEM IV against LEM I under treatment-like conditions for idealized target geometries. Therefore, physical dose distributions resulting from the biological optimization with LEM I were used to recalculate the RBE-weighted dose distribution based on LEM IV. Input parameters representing the clinical endpoints late toxicity in the central nervous system and the tumor control for chordoma were chosen to investigate the impact of changes on the predicted isoeffective dose levels. The recalculated RBE-weighted dose distributions show an increase within the target region, and the mean RBE-weighted dose values are dependent on the geometry and decrease with increasing target dimension. The differences between predictions of LEM IV and LEM I are less than 10% for typical tumor volumes treated in the pilot project at GSI. Median RBE-weighted doses predicted by LEM IV in the target region are consistent with clinically observed dose-response behavior as demonstrated by comparison to the 5-year local control curve for skull base chordoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23075883     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  Proton beam stereotactic radiosurgery for pediatric cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Brian P Walcott; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth; Christopher J Stapleton; Christopher S Ogilvy; Paul H Chapman; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Nuclear dynamics of radiation-induced foci in euchromatin and heterochromatin.

Authors:  Irene Chiolo; Jonathan Tang; Walter Georgescu; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial.

Authors:  Thomas Held; Thomas Tessonnier; Henrik Franke; Sebastian Regnery; Lukas Bauer; Katharina Weusthof; Semi Harrabi; Klaus Herfarth; Andrea Mairani; Jürgen Debus; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.309

Review 5.  Charged particle therapy--optimization, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Jay S Loeffler; Marco Durante
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Active raster scanning with carbon ions: reirradiation in patients with recurrent skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas.

Authors:  Matthias Uhl; Thomas Welzel; Jan Oelmann; Gregor Habl; Henrik Hauswald; Alexandra Jensen; Malte Ellerbrock; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jürgen Debus; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2021-09-17

8.  Induction and Processing of the Radiation-Induced Gamma-H2AX Signal and Its Link to the Underlying Pattern of DSB: A Combined Experimental and Modelling Study.

Authors:  Francesco Tommasino; Thomas Friedrich; Burkhard Jakob; Barbara Meyer; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is there room for combined modality treatments? Dosimetric comparison of boost strategies for advanced head and neck and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Góra; Johannes Hopfgartner; Peter Kuess; Brigita Paskeviciute; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Fast calculation of nanodosimetric quantities in treatment planning of proton and ion therapy.

Authors:  José Ramos-Méndez; Lucas N Burigo; Reinhard Schulte; Cynthia Chuang; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.