Literature DB >> 24448188

Proton beam stereotactic radiosurgery for pediatric cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Brian P Walcott1, Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth, Christopher J Stapleton, Christopher S Ogilvy, Paul H Chapman, Jay S Loeffler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) determined to be high risk for surgery or endovascular embolization, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered the mainstay of treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of pediatric patients with AVMs treated with proton SRS.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 44 consecutively treated pediatric patients (younger than 18 years of age) who underwent proton SRS at our institution from 1998 to 2010. The median target volume was 4.5 ± 5.9 mL (range, 0.3-29.0 mL) and the median maximal diameter was 3.6 ± 1.5 cm (range, 1-6 cm). Radiation was administered with a median prescription dose of 15.50 ± 1.87 CGE to the 90% isodose.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 52 ± 25 months, 2 patients (4.5%) had no response, 24 patients (59.1%) had a partial response, and 18 patients (40.9%) experienced obliteration of their AVM. The median time to obliteration was 49 ± 26 months, including 17 patients who underwent repeat proton radiosurgery. Four patients (9%) experienced hemorrhage after treatment at a median time of 45 ± 15 months. Univariate analysis identified modified AVM scale score (P = .045), single fraction treatment (0.04), larger prescription dose (0.01), larger maximum dose (<0.001), and larger minimum dose (0.01) to be associated with AVM obliteration.
CONCLUSION: High-risk AVMs can be safely treated with proton radiosurgery in the pediatric population. Because protons deposit energy more selectively than photons, there is the potential benefit of protons to lower the probability of damage to healthy tissue in the developing brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24448188      PMCID: PMC4859218          DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  46 in total

Review 1.  Selection of treatment modalities or observation of arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  John C Barr; Christopher S Ogilvy
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  Brain AVM embolization with Onyx.

Authors:  W J van Rooij; M Sluzewski; G N Beute
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Arteriovenous malformations of the brain. A long-term clinical study.

Authors:  D M Forster; L Steiner; S Håkanson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Potential reduction of the incidence of radiation-induced second cancers by using proton beams in the treatment of pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Antony Lomax; Laura Cella; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? No.

Authors:  Herman Suit; Hanne Kooy; Alexei Trofimov; Jonathan Farr; John Munzenrider; Thomas DeLaney; Jay Loeffler; Benjamin Clasie; Sairos Safai; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Modification of the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation grading system.

Authors:  Bruce E Pollock; John C Flickinger
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Curative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with Onyx in 101 patients.

Authors:  Vasilios Katsaridis; Chrysanthi Papagiannaki; Enrico Aimar
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Intention-to-treat analysis of Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V arteriovenous malformations: natural history and treatment paradigm.

Authors:  Patrick P Han; Francisco A Ponce; Robert F Spetzler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  The safety and effectiveness of brain arteriovenous malformation embolization using acrylic and particles: the experiences of a single institution.

Authors:  R C Wallace; R A Flom; M H Khayata; B L Dean; J McKenzie; J C Rand; N A Obuchowski; R C Zepp; J M Zabramski; R F Spetzler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma.

Authors:  W H St Clair; J A Adams; M Bues; B C Fullerton; Sean La Shell; H M Kooy; J S Loeffler; N J Tarbell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Childhood stroke.

Authors:  Peter B Sporns; Heather J Fullerton; Sarah Lee; Helen Kim; Warren D Lo; Mark T Mackay; Moritz Wildgruber
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?

Authors:  S Patel; X Kostaras; M Parliament; I A Olivotto; R Nordal; K Aronyk; N Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Is it beneficial to use apertures in proton radiosurgery with a scanning beam? A dosimetric comparison in neurinoma and meningioma patients.

Authors:  Roberto Righetto; Francesco Fellin; Daniele Scartoni; Maurizio Amichetti; Marco Schwarz; Dante Amelio; Paolo Farace
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.