Literature DB >> 23075275

Free energy barriers to evaporation of water in hydrophobic confinement.

Sumit Sharma1, Pablo G Debenedetti.   

Abstract

We use umbrella sampling Monte Carlo and forward and reverse forward flux sampling (FFS) simulation techniques to compute the free energy barriers to evaporation of water confined between two hydrophobic surfaces separated by nanoscopic gaps, as a function of the gap width, at 1 bar and 298 K. The evaporation mechanism for small (1 × 1 nm(2)) surfaces is found to be fundamentally different from that for large (3 × 3 nm(2)) surfaces. In the latter case, the evaporation proceeds via the formation of a gap-spanning tubular cavity. The 1 × 1 nm(2) surfaces, in contrast, are too small to accommodate a stable vapor cavity. Accordingly, the associated free energy barriers correspond to the formation of a critical-sized cavity for sufficiently large confining surfaces, and to complete emptying of the gap region for small confining surfaces. The free energy barriers to evaporation were found to be of O(20kT) for 14 Å gaps, and to increase by approximately ~5kT with every 1 Å increase in the gap width. The entropy contribution to the free energy of evaporation was found to be independent of the gap width.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23075275     DOI: 10.1021/jp308362h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  11 in total

1.  How hydrophobic drying forces impact the kinetics of molecular recognition.

Authors:  Jagannath Mondal; Joseph A Morrone; B J Berne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pathways to dewetting in hydrophobic confinement.

Authors:  Richard C Remsing; Erte Xi; Srivathsan Vembanur; Sumit Sharma; Pablo G Debenedetti; Shekhar Garde; Amish J Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effect of material flexibility on the thermodynamics and kinetics of hydrophobically induced evaporation of water.

Authors:  Y Elia Altabet; Amir Haji-Akbari; Pablo G Debenedetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Stochastic level-set variational implicit-solvent approach to solute-solvent interfacial fluctuations.

Authors:  Shenggao Zhou; Hui Sun; Li-Tien Cheng; Joachim Dzubiella; Bo Li; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Anomalous water expulsion from carbon-based rods at high humidity.

Authors:  Satish K Nune; David B Lao; David J Heldebrant; Jian Liu; Matthew J Olszta; Ravi K Kukkadapu; Lyle M Gordon; Manjula I Nandasiri; Greg Whyatt; Chris Clayton; David W Gotthold; Mark H Engelhard; Herbert T Schaef
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 39.213

6.  Spontaneous recovery of superhydrophobicity on nanotextured surfaces.

Authors:  Suruchi Prakash; Erte Xi; Amish J Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Free energy of hydrophilic and hydrophobic pores in lipid bilayers by free energy perturbation of a restraint.

Authors:  Mayank Dixit; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Molecular Shape and the Hydrophobic Effect.

Authors:  Matthew B Hillyer; Bruce C Gibb
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 12.703

9.  Intrusion and extrusion of water in hydrophobic nanopores.

Authors:  Antonio Tinti; Alberto Giacomello; Yaroslav Grosu; Carlo Massimo Casciola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Recovering superhydrophobicity in nanoscale and macroscale surface textures.

Authors:  Alberto Giacomello; Lothar Schimmele; Siegfried Dietrich; Mykola Tasinkevych
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.