Literature DB >> 23074528

Community-based care for the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.

.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In June 2008, the Medical Advisory Secretariat began work on the Diabetes Strategy Evidence Project, an evidence-based review of the literature surrounding strategies for successful management and treatment of diabetes. This project came about when the Health System Strategy Division at the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care subsequently asked the secretariat to provide an evidentiary platform for the Ministry's newly released Diabetes Strategy.After an initial review of the strategy and consultation with experts, the secretariat identified five key areas in which evidence was needed. Evidence-based analyses have been prepared for each of these five areas: insulin pumps, behavioural interventions, bariatric surgery, home telemonitoring, and community based care. For each area, an economic analysis was completed where appropriate and is described in a separate report.To review these titles within the Diabetes Strategy Evidence series, please visit the Medical Advisory Secretariat Web site, http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/mas_about.html,DIABETES STRATEGY EVIDENCE PLATFORM: Summary of Evidence-Based AnalysesContinuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetics: An Evidence-Based AnalysisBehavioural Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes: An Evidence-Based AnalysisBARIATRIC SURGERY FOR PEOPLE WITH DIABETES AND MORBID OBESITY: An Evidence-Based SummaryCommunity-Based Care for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: An Evidence-Based AnalysisHome Telemonitoring for Type 2 Diabetes: An Evidence-Based AnalysisApplication of the Ontario Diabetes Economic Model (ODEM) to Determine the Cost-effectiveness and Budget Impact of Selected Type 2 Diabetes Interventions in Ontario
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this report is to determine the efficacy of specialized multidisciplinary community care for the management of type 2 diabetes compared to usual care. CLINICAL NEED: TARGET POPULATION AND CONDITION Diabetes (i.e. diabetes mellitus) is a highly prevalent chronic metabolic disorder that interferes with the body's ability to produce or effectively use insulin. The majority (90%) of diabetes patients have type 2 diabetes. (1) Based on the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), intensive blood glucose and blood pressure control significantly reduce the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetics. While many studies have documented that patients often do not meet the glycemic control targets specified by national and international guidelines, factors associated with glycemic control are less well studied, one of which is the provider(s) of care. Multidisciplinary approaches to care may be particularly important for diabetes management. According guidelines from the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA), the diabetes health care team should be multi-and interdisciplinary. Presently in Ontario, the core diabetes health care team consists of at least a family physician and/or diabetes specialist, and diabetes educators (registered nurse and registered dietician). Increasing the role played by allied health care professionals in diabetes care and their collaboration with physicians may represent a more cost-effective option for diabetes management. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have examined multidisciplinary care programs, but these have either been limited to a specific component of multidisciplinary care (e.g. intensified education programs), or were conducted as part of a broader disease management program, of which not all were multidisciplinary in nature. Most reviews also do not clearly define the intervention(s) of interest, making the evaluation of such multidisciplinary community programs challenging. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: What is the evidence of efficacy of specialized multidisciplinary community care provided by at least a registered nurse, registered dietician and physician (primary care and/or specialist) for the management of type 2 diabetes compared to usual care? [Henceforth referred to as Model 1]What is the evidence of efficacy of specialized multidisciplinary community care provided by at least a pharmacist and a primary care physician for the management of type 2 diabetes compared to usual care? [Henceforth referred to as Model 2] INCLUSION CRITERIA: English language full-reportsPublished between January 1, 2000 and September 28, 2008Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and meta-analysesType 2 diabetic adult population (≥18 years of age)Total sample size ≥30Describe specialized multidisciplinary community care defined as ambulatory-based care provided by at least two health care disciplines (of which at least one must be a specialist in diabetes) with integrated communication between the care providers.Compared to usual care (defined as health care provision by non-specialist(s) in diabetes, such as primary care providers; may include referral to other health care professionals/services as necessary)≥6 months follow-up EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies where discrete results on diabetes cannot be abstractedPredominantly home-based interventionsInpatient-based interventions OUTCOMES OF INTEREST: The primary outcomes for this review were glycosylated hemoglobin (rHbA1c) levels and systolic blood pressure (SBP). SEARCH STRATEGY: A literature search was performed on September 28, 2008 using OVID MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, and the International Agency for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) for studies published between January 1, 2000 and September 28, 2008. Abstracts were reviewed by a single reviewer and, for those studies meeting the eligibility criteria, full-text articles were obtained. Reference lists were also examined for any additional relevant studies not identified through the search. Articles with unknown eligibility were reviewed with a second clinical epidemiologist, then a group of epidemiologists until consensus was established. The quality of evidence was assessed as high, moderate, low or very low according to GRADE methodology. Given the high clinical heterogeneity of the articles that met the inclusion criteria, specific models of specialized multidisciplinary community care were examined based on models of care that are currently being supported in Ontario, models of care that were commonly reported in the literature, as well as suggestions from an Expert Advisory Panel Meeting held on January 21, 2009. SUMMARY OF
FINDINGS: The initial search yielded 2,116 unique citations, from which 22 RCTs trials and nine systematic reviews published were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria. Of these, five studies focused on care provided by at least a nurse, dietician, and physician (primary care and/or specialist) model of care (Model 1; see Table ES 1), while three studies focused on care provided by at least a pharmacist and primary care physician (Model 2; see Table ES 2). Based on moderate quality evidence, specialized multidisciplinary community care Model 2 has demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant reduction in HbA1c of 1.0% compared with usual care. The effects of this model on SBP, however, are uncertain compared with usual care, based on very-low quality evidence. Specialized multidisciplinary community care Model 2 has demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant reduction in both HbA1c of 1.05% (based on high quality evidence) and SBP of 7.13 mm Hg (based on moderate quality evidence) compared to usual care. For both models, the evidence does not suggest a preferred setting of care delivery (i.e., primary care vs. hospital outpatient clinic vs. community clinic). Table ES1:Summary of Results of Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Multidisciplinary Care Model 1OutcomeEstimate of effect(95% CI)Heterogeneity I(2)(p-value)GRADEGlycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c [%])-1.00 [-1.27, -0.73]4% (p=0.37)Moderate-quality     Subgroup: Moderate-to-High Quality-0.91 [-1.19, -0.62]0% (p=0.74)Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)-2.04 [-13.80, 9.72]89% (p=0.002)Very-low quality*Mean change from baseline to follow-up between intervention and control groupsTable ES2:Summary of Results of Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Multidisciplinary Care Model 2OutcomeEstimate of effect(95% CI)Heterogeneity I(2)(p-value)GRADEGlycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c [%])-1.05 [-1.57, -0.52]0% (p=0.75)High-qualitySystolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)-7.13 [-11.78, -2.48]46% (p=0.17)Moderate quality*Mean change from baseline to follow-up between intervention and control groups.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 23074528      PMCID: PMC3377524     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser        ISSN: 1915-7398


  37 in total

1.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

2.  Report from the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Literature searching and evidence interpretation for assessing health care practices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Susan L Norris; Phyllis J Nichols; Carl J Caspersen; Russell E Glasgow; Michael M Engelgau; Leonard Jack; George Isham; Susan R Snyder; Vilma G Carande-Kulis; Sanford Garfield; Peter Briss; David McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Limited impact of lifestyle education in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: results from a randomized intervention study.

Authors:  P Gaede; M Beck; P Vedel; O Pedersen
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J D Piette; M Weinberger; F B Kraemer; S J McPhee
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Evaluation of a nurse-care management system to improve outcomes in patients with complicated diabetes.

Authors:  C Barr Taylor; Nancy Houston Miller; Kelly R Reilly; George Greenwald; Darby Cunning; Allison Deeter; Liana Abascal
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Nurse care manager collaboration with community-based physicians providing diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roland G Hiss; Betty A Armbruster; Mary Lou Gillard; Leslie A McClure
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.140

8.  Physician - nurse practitioner teams in chronic disease management: the impact on costs, clinical effectiveness, and patients' perception of care.

Authors:  David Litaker; Lorraine Mion; Loretta Planavsky; Christopher Kippes; Neil Mehta; Joseph Frolkis
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.338

9.  The North Dublin randomized controlled trial of structured diabetes shared care.

Authors:  S Smith; G Bury; M O'Leary; W Shannon; A Tynan; A Staines; C Thompson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Boon How Chew; Rimke C Vos; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Rob Jpm Scholten; Guy Ehm Rutten
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 2.  Specialized community-based care: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-11-01

Review 3.  From Diabetes Care to Diabetes Cure-The Integration of Systems Biology, eHealth, and Behavioral Change.

Authors:  Ben van Ommen; Suzan Wopereis; Pepijn van Empelen; Hilde M van Keulen; Wilma Otten; Marise Kasteleyn; Johanna J W Molema; Iris M de Hoogh; Niels H Chavannes; Mattijs E Numans; Andrea W M Evers; Hanno Pijl
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  The effectiveness of a value-based EMOtion-cognition-Focused educatIonal programme to reduce diabetes-related distress in Malay adults with Type 2 diabetes (VEMOFIT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Boon-How Chew; Rimke C Vos; Sazlina Shariff Ghazali; Nurainul Hana Shamsuddin; Aaron Fernandez; Firdaus Mukhtar; Mastura Ismail; Azainorsuzila Mohd Ahad; Narayanan N Sundram; Siti Zubaidah Mohd Ali; Guy E H M Rutten
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.763

5.  Nurse-Led, Shared Medical Appointments for Common Gastrointestinal Conditions-Improving Outcomes Through Collaboration With Primary Care in the Medical Home: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Kerri L Novak; Jennifer Halasz; Christopher Andrews; Colleen Johnston; Willem Schoombee; Divine Tanyingoh; Gilaad G Kaplan; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Mark Swain
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-24

6.  An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Effectiveness.

Authors:  Tania Carron; Cloe Rawlinson; Chantal Arditi; Christine Cohidon; Quan Nha Hong; Pierre Pluye; Ingrid Gilles; Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.120

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.