BACKGROUND: Specialized community-based care (SCBC) refers to services that manage chronic illness through formalized links between primary and specialized care. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this evidence-based analysis (EBA) were as follows: to summarize the literature on SCBC, also known as intermediate care to synthesize the evidence from previous Medical Advisory Secretariat (now Health Quality Ontario) EBAs on SCBC for heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic wounds to examine the role of SCBC in family practice RESULTS: PART 1: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF INTERMEDIATE CARE: Seven systematic reviews on intermediate care since 2008 were identified. The literature base is complex and difficult to define. There is evidence to suggest that intermediate care is effective in improving outcomes; however, the effective interventions are still uncertain. PART 2: SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE IN INTERMEDIATE CARE MORTALITY: Heart failure Significant reduction in patients receiving SCBC COPD Nonsignificant reduction in patients receiving SCBC HOSPITALIZATION: Heart failure Nonsignificant reduction in patients receiving SCBC COPD Significant reduction in patients receiving SCBC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS: Heart failure Nonsignificant reduction in patients receiving SCBC COPD Significant reduction in patients receiving SCBC DISEASE-SPECIFIC PATIENT OUTCOMES: COPD Nonsignificant improvement in lung function in patients receiving SCBC Diabetes Significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and systolic blood pressure in patients receiving SCBC Chronic wounds Significant increase in the proportion of healed wounds in patients receiving SCBC QUALITY OF LIFE: Heart failure Trend toward improvement in patients receiving SCBC COPD Significant improvement in patients receiving SCBC PART 3: INTERMEDIATE CARE IN FAMILY PRACTICE--EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS: Five randomized controlled trials were identified comparing SCBC to usual care in family practice. Inclusion criteria were 1) the presence of multiple chronic conditions, and 2) interventions that included 2 or more health care professions. The GRADE quality of the evidence was assessed as low for all outcomes due to the inconsistency and indirectness of the results. LIMITATIONS: This review did not look at disease-specific studies on intermediate care in family practice. CONCLUSIONS: Specialized community-based care effectively improves outcomes in patients with heart failure, COPD, and diabetes. The effectiveness of SCBC in family practice is unclear.
BACKGROUND: Specialized community-based care (SCBC) refers to services that manage chronic illness through formalized links between primary and specialized care. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this evidence-based analysis (EBA) were as follows: to summarize the literature on SCBC, also known as intermediate care to synthesize the evidence from previous Medical Advisory Secretariat (now Health Quality Ontario) EBAs on SCBC for heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic wounds to examine the role of SCBC in family practice RESULTS: PART 1: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF INTERMEDIATE CARE: Seven systematic reviews on intermediate care since 2008 were identified. The literature base is complex and difficult to define. There is evidence to suggest that intermediate care is effective in improving outcomes; however, the effective interventions are still uncertain. PART 2: SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE IN INTERMEDIATE CARE MORTALITY: Heart failure Significant reduction in patients receiving SCBC COPD Nonsignificant reduction in patients receiving SCBC HOSPITALIZATION: Heart failure Nonsignificant reduction in patients receiving SCBC COPD Significant reduction in patients receiving SCBC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS: Heart failure Nonsignificant reduction in patients receiving SCBC COPD Significant reduction in patients receiving SCBC DISEASE-SPECIFIC PATIENT OUTCOMES: COPD Nonsignificant improvement in lung function in patients receiving SCBC Diabetes Significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and systolic blood pressure in patients receiving SCBC Chronic wounds Significant increase in the proportion of healed wounds in patients receiving SCBC QUALITY OF LIFE: Heart failure Trend toward improvement in patients receiving SCBC COPD Significant improvement in patients receiving SCBC PART 3: INTERMEDIATE CARE IN FAMILY PRACTICE--EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS: Five randomized controlled trials were identified comparing SCBC to usual care in family practice. Inclusion criteria were 1) the presence of multiple chronic conditions, and 2) interventions that included 2 or more health care professions. The GRADE quality of the evidence was assessed as low for all outcomes due to the inconsistency and indirectness of the results. LIMITATIONS: This review did not look at disease-specific studies on intermediate care in family practice. CONCLUSIONS: Specialized community-based care effectively improves outcomes in patients with heart failure, COPD, and diabetes. The effectiveness of SCBC in family practice is unclear.
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Peter Tugwell; Andre Knottnerus Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Hae Mi Choe; Sonya Mitrovich; Daniel Dubay; Rodney A Hayward; Sarah L Krein; Sandeep Vijan Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: William Claiborne Dunagan; Benjamin Littenberg; Gregory A Ewald; Catherine A Jones; Valerie Beckham Emery; Brian M Waterman; Daniel C Silverman; Joseph G Rogers Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: John C Scott; Douglas A Conner; Ingrid Venohr; Glenn Gade; Marlene McKenzie; Andrew M Kramer; Lucinda Bryant; Arne Beck Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Donna L McLean; Finlay A McAlister; Jeffery A Johnson; Kathryn M King; Mark J Makowsky; Charlotte A Jones; Ross T Tsuyuki Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-11-24
Authors: Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan; Maya M Jeyaraman; Amrinder Singh Mann; Justin Lys; Becky Skidmore; Kathryn M Sibley; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Ryan Zarychanski Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Alice Coffey; Patricia Leahy-Warren; Eileen Savage; Josephine Hegarty; Nicola Cornally; Mary Rose Day; Laura Sahm; Kieran O'Connor; Jane O'Doherty; Aaron Liew; Duygu Sezgin; Rónán O'Caoimh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sean M Hayes; Sophie Peloquin; Jonathan G Howlett; Karen Harkness; Nadia Giannetti; Carol Rancourt; Nancy Ricard Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 2.655