Literature DB >> 23072991

Novel features of radiation-induced bystander signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana demonstrated using root micro-grafting.

Ting Wang1, Fanghua Li, Wei Xu, Po Bian, Yuejin Wu, Lijun Wu.   

Abstract

Radiation-induced bystander effects (RIBE) have been well demonstrated in whole organisms, as well as in single-cell culture models in vitro and multi-cellular tissues models in vitro, however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, including the temporal and spatial course of bystander signaling. The RIBE in vivo has been shown to exist in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana). Importantly, the unique plant grafting provides a delicate approach for studying the temporal and spatial course of bystander signaling in the context of whole plants. In our previous study, the time course of bystander signaling in plants has been well demonstrated using the root micro-grafting technique. In this study, we further investigated the temporal cooperation pattern of multiple bystander signals, the directionality of bystander signaling, and the effect of bystander tissues on the bystander signaling. The results showed that the bystander response could also be induced efficiently when the asynchronously generated bystander signals reached the bystander tissues in the same period, but not when they entered into the bystander tissues in an inversed sequence. The absence of bystander response in root-inversed grafting indicated that the bystander signaling along roots might be of directionality. The bystander signaling was shown to be independent of the bystander tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A. thaliana; Radiation induced bystander signaling; directionality; root micro-grafting; temporal cooperation pattern

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23072991      PMCID: PMC3578894          DOI: 10.4161/psb.22451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


  38 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability in unirradiated cells induced in vivo by a bystander effect of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  G E Watson; S A Lorimore; D A Macdonald; E G Wright
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro.

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Colin G N Turnbull; Jon P Booker; H M Ottoline Leyser
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Increased bystander mutagenic effect in DNA double-strand break repair-deficient mammalian cells.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; L Huo; J B Little
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 6.  Interrelationships amongst radiation-induced genomic instability, bystander effects, and the adaptive response.

Authors:  Munira A Kadhim; Stephen R Moore; Edwin H Goodwin
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Biological effects in unirradiated human tissue induced by radiation damage up to 1 mm away.

Authors:  Oleg V Belyakov; Stephen A Mitchell; Deep Parikh; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Stephen A Marino; Sally A Amundson; Charles R Geard; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cell-cell contact during gamma irradiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C B Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Bystander effect produced by radiolabeled tumor cells in vivo.

Authors:  Lanny Y Xue; Nicholas J Butler; G Mike Makrigiorgos; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A proliferation-dependent bystander effect in primary porcine and human urothelial explants in response to targeted irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.