Literature DB >> 2307170

External quality control of gamma cameras--results of an inter-laboratory comparison study in Austria.

H Bergmann1, J Hoebart, A Kugi.   

Abstract

Some 28 nuclear medicine departments out of a total of 40 participated in a nationwide Austrian interlaboratory comparison of the imaging quality of gamma cameras. The participation was voluntary, and confidentiality of the individual results was guaranteed. The survey was completed within 2 months, employing instructors to administrate the tests. An emission phantom simulating a flood field with non-uniformities was imaged by 43 cameras, and 54 images were evaluated. The test images were read by the participants using a graded rating scale to indicate the probability of the presence of a non-uniformity in the various parts of the image. The rating data were used to construct individual ROC curves for each image. The area under the ROC curve was used as the ranking parameter for image quality. The results show a spread of the ROC areas between 0.6 and 0.99, with a median of 0.81. A correlation was found between the year of installation and the ROC area obtained from the gamma camera, indicating improvements of performance in more recent cameras, which accounts for part of the variation of the ROC areas. The remaining variations are due to differences in the performance of the gamma cameras. Feedback was provided to the participants by describing individual performance with respect to the true structure of the phantom and by comparing this performance with that of the group. A questionnaire accompanying the test phantom yielded information about the practice of routine quality control and about details of the acquisition and analysis of images.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2307170     DOI: 10.1007/bf01566008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  5 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  The World Health Organization and International Atomic Energy Agency second interlaboratory comparison study in 16 countries on quality performance of nuclear medicine imaging devices.

Authors:  G N Souchkevitch; M Asikainen; A Bäuml; H Bergmann; E Busemann-Sokole; S Carlsson; B Delaloye; F Dermentzoglou; N Herrera; W Jasinski
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1988

3.  World health organisation inter-laboratory comparison study in 12 countries on quality performance of nuclear medicine imaging devices.

Authors:  V Volodin; G Souchkevitch; N Racoveanu; H Bergmann; E Busemann-Sokole; B Delaloye; F Dermentzoglou; G Georgescu; N Herrera; W Jasinski
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1985

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparison of interlaboratory survey date in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) indices.

Authors:  G A Hermann; N Herrera; H T Sugiura
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.