OBJECTIVE: Metastatic colorectal cancer with KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations is not currently treated with anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies. A recent retrospective study in Western countries raised the possibility that KRAS p.G13D mutation may not be absolutely predictive of non-response compared with other KRAS mutations from the findings of longer overall survival and progression-free survival following cetuximab treatment. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between KRAS status and cetuximab efficacy among Japanese patients. METHODS: Data of 109 patients from nine institutions in Japan were retrospectively analysed. All patients were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and they were treated with a cetuximab + irinotecan regimen. The response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were compared according to KRAS status. RESULTS: Overall, 76 (70%), 7 (6%) and 26 (24%) patients had KRAS wild-type, KRAS p.G13D and other KRAS mutations. Their various parameters were as follows: response rate: 30% (23/76), 14% (1/7) and 0% (0/26); disease control rate: 71% (54/76), 71% (5/7) and 54% (14/26); median progression-free survival: 4.6 months (95% confidence interval, 2.8-6.3), 4.1 months (0-9.9) and 2.1 months (1.5-2.8); and median overall survival: 11.2 months (6.4-16.0), 8.5 months (5.3-11.8) and 6.8 months (4.1-9.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or overall survival was observed between KRAS p.G13D-mutant and other mutant tumours, the disease control rate was higher in KRAS p.G13D-mutant patients and a partial response was observed in one such patient. Our study suggested that cetuximab showed some activity in KRAS p.G13D-mutant colorectal cancer patients. Further research is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: Metastatic colorectal cancer with KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations is not currently treated with anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies. A recent retrospective study in Western countries raised the possibility that KRASp.G13D mutation may not be absolutely predictive of non-response compared with other KRAS mutations from the findings of longer overall survival and progression-free survival following cetuximab treatment. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between KRAS status and cetuximab efficacy among Japanese patients. METHODS: Data of 109 patients from nine institutions in Japan were retrospectively analysed. All patients were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and they were treated with a cetuximab + irinotecan regimen. The response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were compared according to KRAS status. RESULTS: Overall, 76 (70%), 7 (6%) and 26 (24%) patients had KRAS wild-type, KRASp.G13D and other KRAS mutations. Their various parameters were as follows: response rate: 30% (23/76), 14% (1/7) and 0% (0/26); disease control rate: 71% (54/76), 71% (5/7) and 54% (14/26); median progression-free survival: 4.6 months (95% confidence interval, 2.8-6.3), 4.1 months (0-9.9) and 2.1 months (1.5-2.8); and median overall survival: 11.2 months (6.4-16.0), 8.5 months (5.3-11.8) and 6.8 months (4.1-9.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or overall survival was observed between KRASp.G13D-mutant and other mutant tumours, the disease control rate was higher in KRASp.G13D-mutant patients and a partial response was observed in one such patient. Our study suggested that cetuximab showed some activity in KRASp.G13D-mutant colorectal cancerpatients. Further research is warranted.
Authors: Hafeez Afolabi; Salzihan Md Salleh; Zaidi Zakaria; Ch'ng Ewe Seng; Siti Norasikin Binti Mohd Nafil; Ahmad Aizat Bin Abdul Aziz; Yusuf Wada; Ahmad Irekeola Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: Anna Biernacka; Peter D Tsongalis; Jason D Peterson; Francine B de Abreu; Candice C Black; Edward J Gutmann; Xiaoying Liu; Laura J Tafe; Christopher I Amos; Gregory J Tsongalis Journal: Cancer Genet Date: 2016-03-18
Authors: Min Seob Kwak; Jae Myung Cha; Jin Young Yoon; Jung Won Jeon; Hyun Phil Shin; Hye Jung Chang; Hyung Kyung Kim; Kwang Ro Joo; Joung Il Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Luis Eduardo W de Carvalho; Jonathan S Sarraf; Ana Carolina M Oliveira; Nilson D B Neto; Thiago F Câmara; Fernando Luiz A Fonseca; Fernando Adami Journal: Case Rep Oncol Date: 2017-08-23