| Literature DB >> 27209202 |
Kara L Piechowski1, Stacy Elder2, Leigh E Efird2, Elliott R Haut3,4,5,6, Michael B Streiff4,7, Brandyn D Lau3,8, Peggy S Kraus2, Cynthia S Rand9, Victor O Popoola3, Deborah B Hobson4,10, Norma E Farrow4, Dauryne Shaffer4,10, Kenneth M Shermock2,4,11.
Abstract
Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is important patient safety practice in hospitalized patients. However, a substantial number of ordered doses are not administered. Patient and nursing attitudes and behaviors can influence whether a patient receives a dose. The objective of this single center study was to evaluate prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding missed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. An anonymous, 9-question survey was administered to internal medicine and general surgery resident physicians. The survey captured prescriber opinions on issues related to non-administration of VTE prophylaxis. Thirty-two percent of medicine residents compared with 3 % of surgery residents felt pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was not necessary in an independently ambulating patient (P < 0.001). Medicine residents were more likely to agree that it is appropriate for nurses to make clinical decisions to determine whether a dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis should be administered to a patient (24 vs. 0 %, P < 0.001). Study findings indicate the need for additional resident physician education. Further investigation is needed to assess these beliefs and ensure patients receive necessary VTE prophylaxis.Entities:
Keywords: Patient safety; Survey; Thromboembolism; VTE prophylaxis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27209202 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1378-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis ISSN: 0929-5305 Impact factor: 2.300