Literature DB >> 23069924

Imaging of bone metastases in prostate cancer: an update.

W Langsteger1, S Haim, M Knauer, P Waldenberger, K Emmanuel, W Loidl, I Wolf, M Beheshti.   

Abstract

Assessing bone metastases is often beyond the scope of plain - film radiography, and nuclear imaging in particular with bone scintigraphy has proved the mainstay for detection of bony disease for over 40 years. Bone scanning with 99mTechnetium - labeled diphosphonates relies on the detection of pathological osteoblastic response elicited from malignant cells. This technique offers the advantage of whole body examination, low cost, availability and high sensitivity. However, it suffers from relative low specificity. The addition of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to bone scintigraphy has markedly improved the diagnostic benefit. Although the accuracy of SPECT is significantly higher than that of planar scintigraphy, there is still room for improvement of anatomic localization and morphological characterization, a limitation that has currently been mainly overcome with the upcoming of combined SPECT-CT (computed tomography). Positron emission tomography (PET), a modality with higher spatial resolution than that of SPECT can be particularly helpful in detecting small lesions. Moreover, PET imaging using various specific radiotracers has the advantage of detecting malignant disease in both bone and soft tissues. It is highly sensitive mainly in detecting early bone marrow as well as for diagnosing lytic bony metastases and can be also reliably used to monitor therapy response. In this review, we present the current role of SPECT and PET in the imaging of skeletal metastases from prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23069924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1824-4785            Impact factor:   2.346


  10 in total

Review 1.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A urologist's perspective on prostate cancer imaging: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Arvin K George; Baris Turkbey; Subin G Valayil; Akhil Muthigi; Francesca Mertan; Michael Kongnyuy; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

5.  Diagnostic Performance of 18F-Fluciclovine in Detection of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Albert Chau; Peter Gardiner; Patrick M Colletti; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  Reduced acquisition times in whole body bone scintigraphy using a noise-reducing Pixon®-algorithm-a qualitative evaluation study.

Authors:  Oscar Ardenfors; Ulrika Svanholm; Hans Jacobsson; Patricia Sandqvist; Per Grybäck; Cathrine Jonsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Descotes
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-02-14

8.  Stability Evaluation and Stabilization of a Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR) Targeting Imaging Pharmaceutical.

Authors:  Arijit Ghosh; Karen Woolum; Shankaran Kothandaraman; Michael F Tweedle; Krishan Kumar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  When to perform positron emission tomography/computed tomography or radionuclide bone scan in patients with recently diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carmelo Caldarella; Giorgio Treglia; Alessandro Giordano; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Bone Scintigraphy in Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in Regard of Different Risk Groups.

Authors:  Sabina Sevcenco; Bernhard Grubmüller; Charlotte Sonneck-Koenne; Yasaman Ahmadi; Peter Knoll; Andreas Floth; Wolfgang Pokieser; Shahin Zandieh; Hans Christoph Klingler; Sharokh Shariat; Siroos Mirzaei
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2019
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.