Literature DB >> 23069742

Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: Should it be the rule?

Elisabet Clua1, Rosa Tur, Buenaventura Coroleu, Montse Boada, I Rodríguez, Pedro N Barri, Anna Veiga.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (fresh embryo transfers followed by frozen-thawed embryo transfers from the same stimulated cycle) between single-embryo transfer (SET) and double-embryo transfer (DET) in an oocyte donation programme. A retrospective analysis of the outcome in 1139 recipient fresh cycles (1073 from DET and 66 from SET) with at least three available embryos for transfer was performed. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar after SET (45.5%, 30/66) and DET (57.1%, 613/1073), whereas the multiple pregnancy rate was 0% and 39.5% for SET and DET, respectively. After evaluating the results using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in a period of 1 year, no statistically significant differences were observed in the cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (SET 82.8% and 76.4% versus DET 77.2% and 63.7%). The results indicate that for women who have at least three available embryos in oocyte donation programmes, one single embryo should be transferred as no significant decrease in the success rate is observed and multiple pregnancy can be avoided. Clinical pregnancy rate is higher when transferring two embryos compared with one. However, this also results in a higher incidence of twin pregnancy, which is associated with increased obstetric and perinatal risks. The aim of this study was to compare the cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (fresh embryo transfers followed by frozen-thawed embryo transfers from the same stimulated cycle) between single-embryo transfer (SET) and double-embryo transfer (DET) cycles in our oocyte donation programme. A retrospective analysis of the outcome in 1139 recipient fresh cycles (1076 from DET and 66 from SET) with at least three available embryos for transfer was performed. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar after SET (45.5%, 30/66) and DET (57.1%, 613/1073), whereas the multiple pregnancy rate was 0% and 39.5% for SET and DET, respectively. The cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar between the two strategies (SET 82.8% versus DET 77.2%) and the same was found for the cumulative live birth rates (SET 76.4% versus DET 63.7%). Our results indicate that for women who have at least three available embryos in OD programmes, one single embryo should be transferred as no significant decrease in the success rate is observed while multiple pregnancy is avoided.
Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23069742     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

1.  Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Vaishali Suraj; Erica J Behnke; Xinli Yang; Marlane J Angle; Jaclyn C Lambe-Steinmiller; Rachel Watterson; Kelly Athayde Wirka; Alice A Chen; Shehua Shen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Protein C global assay evaluation in naturally conceived vs. assisted reproduction-achieved twin pregnancies: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Mariana Issawy; Ido Izhaki; Izhar Ben-Shlomo; Sofia Soltsman; Yuri Perlitz; Moshe Ben-Ami; Benjamin Brenner; Galit Sarig
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  The presence of multiple gestational sacs confers a higher live birth rate in women with infertility who achieve a positive pregnancy test after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective local cohort.

Authors:  Erika Balassiano; Shaveta Malik; Praful Vaid; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 4.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  One Plus One Is Better Than Two: Cumulative Reproductive Outcomes Are Better after Two Elective Single Blastocyst Embryo Transfers Compared to One Double Blastocyst Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Vidhisha P Mehta; Jayesh A Patel; Reena H Gupta; Sandeep I Shah; Manish R Banker
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.