Literature DB >> 23069258

Microvessel density is not increased in prostate cancer: digital imaging of routine sections and tissue microarrays.

Maria Tretiakova1, Tatjana Antic, David Binder, Masha Kocherginsky, Chuanhong Liao, Jerome B Taxy, Aytekin Oto.   

Abstract

Angiogenesis is considered a prognostic factor and therapy target in many tumors but remains controversial in prostate cancer. This study compares the microvessel density of normal prostate and prostate cancer of different grades using an automated approach to determine its clinical utility. Neoplastic and normal prostatic tissues from 60 prostatectomies were examined by routine histological sections (group I); 136 prostatectomies were used to create tissue microarrays (group II). Microvessel density was calculated using CD31 immunostaining. Automated Cellular Image System (ChromaVision, San Juan Capistrano, CA) and Aperio automated systems were used to digitally analyze microvessel density in Groups I and II respectively. Microvessel density was not significantly increased in tumor versus normal prostate in Group I (P = .303). Both the mean vessel count and vessel area were significantly higher in normal tissue than in tumor either by Automated Cellular Image System or Aperio analysis (P < .05). Aperio analysis in group II additionally showed significantly higher values in normal tissue for vessel lumen (P < .001), whereas vessel perimeter, wall thickness, vessel compactness, and shape were not significantly different (P > .05). Aperio comparison of low- versus high-grade prostate cancer demonstrated that only mean vessel count was increased in high-grade tumors (P = .047); no other automated parameter in either group showed significant association with Gleason scores. Irrespective of methodology, microvessel density was not increased in prostate cancer compared to normal prostate. The bias of using vascular hot spots that possibly contributed to previous contradictory results has been mitigated by automated microvessel density quantitation here. Similar microvessel density of low- and high-grade tumors indicate that microvessel density is neither an important nor reliable prognostic marker for prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23069258     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  19 in total

1.  Physical Activity and Prostate Tumor Vessel Morphology: Data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Erin L Van Blarigan; John P Gerstenberger; June M Chan; Lorelei A Mucci; Stacey A Kenfield; Edward L Giovannucci; Meir J Stampfer; Lee W Jones; Steven K Clinton
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  ELTD1, an effective anti-angiogenic target for gliomas: preclinical assessment in mouse GL261 and human G55 xenograft glioma models.

Authors:  Jadith Ziegler; Richard Pody; Patricia Coutinho de Souza; Blake Evans; Debra Saunders; Nataliya Smith; Samantha Mallory; Charity Njoku; Yunzhou Dong; Hong Chen; Jiali Dong; Megan Lerner; Osamah Mian; Sai Tummala; James Battiste; Kar-Ming Fung; Jonathan D Wren; Rheal A Towner
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Interactive Feature Space Explorer© for multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alpay Özcan; Barış Türkbey; Peter L Choyke; Oguz Akin; Ömer Aras; Seong K Mun
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Identifying in vivo DCE MRI markers associated with microvessel architecture and gleason grades of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Asha Singanamalli; Mirabela Rusu; Rachel E Sparks; Natalie N C Shih; Amy Ziober; Li-Ping Wang; John Tomaszewski; Mark Rosen; Michael Feldman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study.

Authors:  Yahui Peng; Yulei Jiang; Cheng Yang; Jeremy Bancroft Brown; Tatjana Antic; Ila Sethi; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Maryellen L Giger; Scott E Eggener; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Two-dimensional neovascular complexity is significantly higher in nontumor prostate tissue than in low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Fabio Grizzi; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Mauro Seveso; Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Girolamo Fiorini; Giovanni Lughezzani; Paolo Casale; Nicolò Buffi; Massimo Lazzari; Giorgio Guazzoni
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-06-02

7.  Association between tumor-associated macrophages and microvessel density on prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Prahara Yuri; Ahmad Zulfan Hendri; Raden Danarto
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-07-28

8.  Is angiogenesis a hallmark of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Fabio Grizzi; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of blood vessels in the rabbit eye by X-ray phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Xiuqing Qian; Kunya Zhang; Qianqian Cui; Qiuyun Zhao; Zhicheng Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Dysregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor and semaphorin ligand-receptor families in prostate cancer metastasis.

Authors:  R Joseph Bender; Feilim Mac Gabhann
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2015-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.